T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
2460.1 | | SEND::SLAVIN | | Wed Mar 26 1997 08:55 | 9 |
|
>ObjectBroker 2.7.11, DEC C++ 5.5, Digital Unix 3.2
Note, you are using a compiler that is not supported by this release of OBB.
OBB V2.7-10 and V2.7-11 support DEC C++ V5.0 on Digital Unix.
This is probably not causing your problem, but may cause others in
the future, as OBB was not tested with the compiler you have selected.
|
2460.2 | Use external typecodes if it is both a client and a server | SEND::VLATAS | WARNING: Do not swallow the battery door | Wed Mar 26 1997 09:13 | 12 |
|
If your app is both a client and a server, you should generate
external typecodes. This will generate one typecode module for
your application instead of generating them in both the client
stub module and the server side dispatcher module.
Also, for C++ there is a known problem that shows up with a C++
client/server in some circumstances (PTR 16-3-251) that may
affect you. The workaround for this problem is to remove the
INCLUDED_BY_IMH #define in the generated HXX file.
Tony
|
2460.3 | OBB and C++ on Digital Unix - versions? | NETRIX::"[email protected]" | Paul Doyle | Thu Apr 03 1997 09:33 | 16 |
| > SEND::SLAVIN on Wed, 26 Mar 1997 08:55:11 EST
>
> OBB V2.7-10 and V2.7-11 support DEC C++ V5.0 on Digital Unix.
According to http://www.zk3.dec.com/decc/decc-kitinfo.html, DEC C++ V5.0
is pre-August 1995 and is no longer available from the internal
distribution site.
Should I look elsewhere for V5.0, or is anything more recent than V5.0
supported by OBB 2.7-11?
Thanks,
Paul
[Posted by WWW Notes gateway]
|
2460.4 | | RECV::SLAVIN | | Thu Apr 03 1997 10:07 | 6 |
| >Should I look elsewhere for V5.0, or is anything more recent than V5.0
>supported by OBB 2.7-11?
The OBB V2.7-11 CLD release was a critical bug fix release for OBB
V2.7. So we did not alter compilers used. No other compilers were
tested by the team for that release.
|
2460.5 | Re: OBB and C++ on Digital Unix - versions?' | NETRIX::"[email protected]" | Paul Doyle | Thu Apr 03 1997 11:31 | 17 |
| RECV::SLAVIN on Thu, 03 Apr 1997 09:07:48 EST said:
> >Should I look elsewhere for V5.0, or is anything more recent than V5.0
> >supported by OBB 2.7-11?
>
> The OBB V2.7-11 CLD release was a critical bug fix release for OBB
> V2.7. So we did not alter compilers used. No other compilers were
> tested by the team for that release.
I understand that C++ 5.5 for Digital Unix is the earliest with an STL
implementation - are we going out on a limb if we use this?
Thanks,
Paul
[Posted by WWW Notes gateway]
|
2460.6 | | REQUE::BOWER | Peter Bower, ObjectBroker | Sun Apr 06 1997 19:40 | 9 |
|
> I understand that C++ 5.5 for Digital Unix is the earliest with an STL
> implementation - are we going out on a limb if we use this?
I doubt you will see any major problems due to the C++ version. I know
of one warning in the .hxx file concerning a friend declaration;
this can be worked around by adding a keyword.
|