T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1362.1 | | EMNTAL::STADELMANN | Sepp @ZUO 760-2609 | Fri Feb 07 1997 06:05 | 1 |
| May we can just add a short cut to it during setup.
|
1362.2 | Used by the command line | REQUE::ctxobj.zko.dec.com::Patrick | ObjectBroker Engineering | Fri Feb 07 1997 09:26 | 5 |
| The ObbCmd.Hlp is referenced by the command line on Win32
platforms. If you type an obb command and use the -? switch,
you will get online help for the current command.
Paul Patrick
|
1362.3 | | VAXCPU::michaud | Jeff Michaud - ObjectBroker | Fri Feb 07 1997 10:39 | 8 |
| > Please add obbcmd as a stande allone manual i.e. a command reference to
> the ObjectBroker Book Shelf.
FWIW, Suggestions really belong in:
Send::ObjectBroker_Suggestions
(that's only of course if you want them tracked a:-)
|
1362.4 | | LEMAN::DONALDSON | Froggisattva! Froggisattva! | Mon Feb 10 1997 05:11 | 7 |
| Come on guys, this is not a 'suggestion'. The Command
manual *should* be in the books group and it isn't.
These days I just pull it out onto the desktop as
a shortcut. But *I* know its there. Customers dont.
John D.
|
1362.5 | | VAXCPU::michaud | Jeff Michaud - ObjectBroker | Fri Feb 14 1997 10:38 | 14 |
| > Come on guys, this is not a 'suggestion'. The Command
> manual *should* be in the books group and it isn't.
So if it's not a suggestion, and it's most definitly not
a bug, then what is it? :-))
Seriously though, this is a suggestion (or a request for
new functionality, but a Rose by another name is still
a Rose :-). And it's a GOOD suggestion, but it needs
to be tracked in order to be considered by management
for inclusion in the product. It's not as simple as simply
adding a new icon on NT, this also needs to be considered
for Win95, and the doc folks need to consider adding a
link to it from the "bookshelf.hlp" file.
|
1362.6 | | CAMPY::ADEY | Is there a 'Life for Dummies'? | Sun Feb 16 1997 22:48 | 5 |
| re: Note 1362.5 by VAXCPU::michaud
While maybe not a 'bug', it's certainly an oversight!
Ken....
|
1362.7 | | VAXCPU::michaud | Jeff Michaud - ObjectBroker | Mon Feb 17 1997 20:59 | 15 |
| > While maybe not a 'bug', it's certainly an oversight!
Calling it an 'oversight' assumes it was indeed an oversight,
but it could of just as well been a deliberate omission of
functionality that at the time was not deemed necessary.
I've used DOS and Windows applications that brought up winhelp
when you specified -? on the command line, but for which there
was no icon/shortcut to get to the same help file.
As I said, I agree that this is a good suggestion, I hope someone
officially suggests it :-)
over.sight \-.si-t\ n 1: MANAGEMENT, SUPERVISION 2: an inadvertent omission
or error
|