T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
286.2 | | RDOVAX::BRAKE | A Question of Balance | Tue Jul 09 1991 14:18 | 7 |
| Thanks, John. Makes sense the way you explain it but it still stinks.
I'm envisioning being one card short (say Darryl Irvine) and having to
pay 50 cents for it. Jeez, sure takes the fun out of it.
Rich
|
286.3 | It's Our Fault! | MSBCS::YANNEKIS | | Tue Jul 09 1991 14:45 | 17 |
|
>
> Dealers for the most part probably
> don't even know baseball, especially when you see them do this
> rookie pricing with some guy who's 30 years old and finally made it
> to the majors.
>
The only reason dealers charge a premium for nameless rookies, even
30 year old rookies who can never become hall-a-famers, is because of
us, ***** the collectors ******, who are stupid enough to pay the
premium prices the dealers charge.
No one puts a gun to collectors heads ...the "Industry" doesn't set
prices ... we do. If we pay the high price, we set the high price.
Greg
|
286.4 | | CERBUS::KARLSON | Only 169 shopping days until Xmas! | Tue Jul 09 1991 15:25 | 22 |
|
RE: .3
No the *COLLECTOR* wants one or two for his COLLECTION.
If all that were out there were COLLECTORS, the dealers would
have rookie cards galore (which they do anyway, but that's another
soapbox) available.
As it is, because of INVESTORS, who buys these unknowns up
by the bushel full, looking for thaat next great "penny stock",
the dealer prices them for whatever he can get. The investor
still buys 'em, it's the collector who gets it in the end -- having
to pay more than a nickel (common price) for unproven rookies.
Try trading for your the cards you need. I almost always
manage to finish my sets WITHOUT going to a dealer by trading
with people in here. I know that John and I have helped fill
many many want-lists for free, or occasionally charging common price
for a large lot.
There are alternatives ...
|
286.7 | | JUNCO::RNEWCOMB | FBA --> It's Fantastic | Thu Jul 11 1991 15:26 | 8 |
| re;5
But Mike, where do you do business to pick up bulk cards at
a good price. I've tried this approach with 2 local dealers
with cards and they want Becketts price as soon as they are
released.
Newc
|
286.8 | | CERBUS::KARLSON | Only 167 shopping days until Xmas! | Thu Jul 11 1991 15:48 | 73 |
|
Ha! And Beckett's says they get their prices from talking to
dealers and shops.
Nothing fishy here huh guys?
Every year when the new cards come out, the hottest rookies
show up for $2.00-$2.50, the semi-hot rookies for $1.00-$1.50
the career-journeyman and everyone else deemed a rookie shows
up for anywhere from a dime to a buck.
Part of it is people willing to pay this amount, part of it is
dealers wanting to get their end of the long-term money on these
players.
For example. A couple of years ago, all the price GUIDES had
87F Will Clark listed for $3 -- ask John Damiano. He was crying
for people in here to buy them for him (he's on the west coast
where they were going for $8-10).
But if you asked a dealer if they had any. Oh no! Geez, wish I
had some. Sorry guy. Let me know if you find any.
You know why? They knew that eventually he was going to be HOT.
And hot translates into dollars.
So they hoarded them.
Is this wrong? Is this illegal? Is this immoral? Nope. It's
their cards, and they have every right to do with them as they
please. They don't like that the market is scoffing them up?
Hold out for a price more to your liking.
Now that all the price GUIDES have it upwards of $25-40, you can
see these cards everywhere. Did Fleer suddenly print some more?
More likely, one of two things happened:
- Dealers could get a really good price for their cards,
so the price had reached a point where they'd rather
sell it than hold on to it (which should be a lesson
to people buying at that price)
- Mike Kelly sold his lot ... 8^)
But for every Will Clark or Don Mattingly, there's a Bill Benes,
a Joe Charbonneau, and believe it or not a Bo Jackson (after his
first season, when he was in the minors, and creating windgusts
with his whiffs his cards were as cold as ice). But because the
potential is there for BIG return, people are willing to buy a
bunch of Bill Benes cards for pennies apiece.
So, if everyone keeps their Bill Benes cards priced at a nickel
apiece, and everyone wants 'em, what happens? Why they disappear.
So dealers begin elevating the price until it reaches a point
where some people buy, some people don't, and they're able to keep
some in stock.
Is this a concious effort on their parts. I really don't believe
so.
But back to Beckett's. I can't count the number of times cards
have appeared in Beckett's before we've even seen hide or hair
of them out here. And the price guide that's applicable on the
west coast, is nowhere near applicable down south or in the
northeast. Different regions, different demands, different
economies. But Beckett's takes care of this a sweeeping disclaimer:
"Remember, local and regional trends may affect prices in your area".
I actually had a dealer tell me once, when looking over a stack
of 1970 commons; "The Red Sox will be double-book, because we're
New England".
(Boy, have I gone off on a tangent or what? 8^)
|
286.9 | local favorites are always more | SMAUG::FLOWERS | IBM Interconnect Eng. | Thu Jul 11 1991 18:35 | 24 |
| > (Boy, have I gone off on a tangent or what? 8^)
Ya, but it made for good reading :-)
> I actually had a dealer tell me once, when looking over a stack
> of 1970 commons; "The Red Sox will be double-book, because we're
> New England".
Just once?! I get this all the time when it comes to Bruins cards (I
collect only hockey). Drives me crazy! It can even be worse than twice
as much...for example, Ray Bourque's 2cd Topps card has a Beckett price
of $4. I've seen it going around here for $12 to $20! That's ridiculous.
So when I was in Pennsylvania I stopped at a shop and picked up 5 of them
for $2.50 each (ended up giving them to a few friends)... And we all
know this is how dealer's get the local favorites for decent prices.
Of course this is not just local to Boston. I do some trading with
people from around the country because they have the same problem. I send
them their local team, and they send me Bruins (at a reasonable price).
...but I've digressed even further from .0
Cheers,
Dan
|
286.10 | | RAYBOK::DAMIANO | Read the sports page | Thu Jul 11 1991 19:41 | 35 |
| RE: .8 (87F Will Clark)
Gee, Roy, I don't think I was crying! 8^)
FWIW, I ended up with about 15 or so, mostly by calling shops around
the country (and a few noters). I never did find any around here for
"book", but when they hit $40.00 all of the sudden every shop, table,
and loon imaginable had a fistfull to sell. The card was blazing hot
for about a month (during which time I traded 3 for a mint 1960 Mays,
another for a mint 1952 Bill Rigney, and another for a mint 1955 Dusty
Rhodes) and then the demand was satisfied with a glut. Everybody that
wanted one had it, and the price slipped. Now they are collecting dust
on the dealer shelves, but the price remains fairly steady. After a few
other deals, I ended up with about 6 left, and they aren't sellable
right now.
So what I guess I'm saying is I agree with you, Becketts is bullbleep,
at least on a national level. Regions are *extremely* different in
price, depending on the card in question. That's why I usually confine
my major aquisitions to out of state trips; Mays doesn't sell as well
in South Dakota as he does here in NorCal.
And even when you pick the right rookie, timing is critical. Even when
a card is valued a high price, if all the dealers have a couple in
their inventory, they won't buy yours unless you give them away, and
only if you are civil while doing it.
But them again, I'm not a skilled investor, and don't like doing it
much. But, if you make the right move, you can enhance your collection
a bit.
Now, speaking of tangents, how was that?
John D.
|
286.12 | | RAYBOK::DAMIANO | Read the sports page | Fri Jul 12 1991 12:12 | 8 |
| RE: .11
Following along on the receipt angle, I'm no expert but I'm willing to
bet a single card sold at a shop is subject to sales tax. I don't
recall ever getting a receipt or paying sales tax, with the exception
of new packaged stuff.
John D.
|