[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference rusure::math

Title:Mathematics at DEC
Moderator:RUSURE::EDP
Created:Mon Feb 03 1986
Last Modified:Fri Jun 06 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:2083
Total number of notes:14613

1998.0. "Tournament of the Towns, November 1988, Senior" by AUSSIE::GARSON (achtentachtig kacheltjes) Fri Sep 15 1995 23:42

1. What is the smallest number of squares of a chess board that can be marked
in such a manner that

(a) no two marked squares may have a common side or a common vertex, and

(b) any unmarked square has a common side or a common vertex with at least one
    marked square?

Indicate a specific configuration of marked squares satisfying (a) and (b) and
show that a lesser number of marked squares will not suffice.

2. Prove that a�pq + b�qr + c�rp <= 0, whenever a, b and c are the lengths of
the sides of a triangle and p + q + r = 0.
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
1998.1solution to #1DECADA::YODERMFYMon Sep 18 1995 10:519
Consider condition (b) first.  A marked square can be considered to "cover"
itself and all its neighbors, that is, all squares that can be reached in a king
move.  Give the board a coordinate system with (1,1) and (8,8) as opposite
corners; consider those squares whose x- and y-coordinates are both == 1 (mod
3).  A marked square can cover at most 1 of those, and there are 9 in all, so we
need at least 9 marked squares.  (The squares are {1,4,7} x {1,4,7}.)

If we mark exactly those 9 squares, we cover the entire board, and no 2 of the 9
are neighbors.  So this solves part (a).
1998.2solution for #2DECADA::YODERMFYMon Sep 18 1995 12:3822
We can find two of p,q,r whose product is >=0 (if one of them is 0 this is
immediate, otherwise there must be two with the same sign).  WLOG let these two
be p and q.  By the triangle inequality

  a <= b+c

   2    2         2
  a <= b + 2bc + c

   2          2         2
  a pq <= pq(b + 2bc + c )

                 2                 2 2   2 2
From 0 <= (bq-cp) we get 2bcpq <= b q + c p ; using this,

   2       2     2     2     2
  a pq <= b (pq+q ) + c (pq+p )

   2       2         2
  a pq <= b (-qr) + c (-pr)

and the desired inequality follows immediately.