| 80%.
Suppose the original t*r^2 is so large that the other terms are negligible.
Then the total increase in costs is 1.5*1.1*1.1 = 1.815.
This is the worst case -- if one of the other terms is large enough not to
be negligible, its increase will average the total down. The n*t term only
increases by 1.5x, and the 200 term increases (?) by 1.0x.
Was this what you wanted, or did you want something in terms of the original
n, r, t?
|
| The percentage increase is
Cost(n,1.1*r,1.5*t) - Cost(n,r,t)
--------------------------------- * 100
Cost(n,r,t)
which expands to
0.5 * n*t + 0.815 * t*r^2
------------------------- * 100
200 + n*t + t*r^2
0.5 * n + 0.815 * r^2
= --------------------- * 100 = F(n,r,t)
200/t + n + r^2
Maximize this, subject to n,r,t all positive.
First, any increase in t will increase F, because it makes the denominator
smaller. Any increase in r increases F, because it increases the
numerator more than the denominator. And any _decrease_ in n increases F,
because the denominator is decreased more than then numerator.
So
n -> 0
r -> infinity
t -> infinity
And
F -> 0.815 * 100 = 100 * ( (1.5)*(1.1)^2 - 1 )
So the maximum increase is 81.5%
|