[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference rusure::math

Title:Mathematics at DEC
Moderator:RUSURE::EDP
Created:Mon Feb 03 1986
Last Modified:Fri Jun 06 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:2083
Total number of notes:14613

1714.0. "CMJ Problem 494" by RUSURE::EDP (Always mount a scratch monkey.) Thu Jan 28 1993 10:20

    Proposed by Frank Schmidt, Arlington, VA.
    
    For A a subset of { 0, 1 }, let N(A,n) be the number of n by n matrices
    of Z/2Z whose set of eigenvalues in Z/2Z is precisely A.  Find a
    formula for N(A,n).
    
    [Z is in bold face, denoting the integers.  -- edp]
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
1714.13/4 solvedHERON::BUCHANANThe was not found.Sat Feb 27 1993 13:0637
>    For A a subset of { 0, 1 }, let N(A,n) be the number of n by n matrices
>    [over] Z/2Z whose set of eigenvalues in Z/2Z is precisely A.  Find a
>    formula for N(A,n).
>    
>    [Z is in bold face, denoting the integers.  -- edp]

	Let W = N(�,n)
	    X = N({0},n)
	    Y = N({1),n)
	    Z = N({0,1},n)

	First of all, W+X+Y+Z = 2^(n^2).   I didn't think so at first, but I
wasn't reading the questions carefully.   The question asks for the set of
eigenvalues in Z/2Z.

	Next, W+Y = just the number of non-singular matrices.
	That's (2^n - 1) * (2^n - 2) * (2^n - 4) * ... * (2^n - 2^n-1)
=	2^(n(n-1)/2) * prod(j=1..n)(2^j - 1)

	Now the map, f:M -> I+M is a permutation of the set of matrices over 
Z/2Z.   Moreover, if M has eigenvalue 0, then f(M) has eigenvalue 1, and vice 
versa.   So:
	W+X = W+Y
& hence
	X = Y

	There's only one degree of freedom left in the system.   If we could
just construct W, for instance, then we would know all of X,Y,Z.

n=0	=>	W=0	(X=Y=0, Z=0)
n=1	=>	W=0	(X=Y=1, Z=0)
n=2	=>	W=2	(X=Y=4, Z=6)
n=3	=>	W=48	(X=Y=120, Z= 224)

	But the general formula escapes me...

Andrew.