[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference rusure::math

Title:Mathematics at DEC
Moderator:RUSURE::EDP
Created:Mon Feb 03 1986
Last Modified:Fri Jun 06 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:2083
Total number of notes:14613

1442.0. "Modern Temple Geometry" by CLT::TRACE::GILBERT (Ownership Obligates) Tue May 14 1991 15:54

Suppose we have a triangle ABC, with base BC, and draw a line l thru A
parallel to BC.  Draw lines from A to BC, dividing BC in n segments,
not necessarily equal.

Now incribe a circle in each of the n small triangles.  Let h[i] be
the distance from the top of the i'th circle to line l.

The problem is to show that the product of the h[i] is a constant.

(This problem is due to Stan Rabinowitz; inspired by some "Temple Geometry").
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
1442.1JARETH::EDPAlways mount a scratch monkey.Tue May 14 1991 16:287
    Re .0:
    
    Since each division produces two new triangles, it suffices to prove
    the theorem for a single division.  Induction will carry on from there.
    
    
    				-- edp
1442.2the answerDESIR::BUCHANANTue Jul 21 1992 13:0856
Note 1442.0
>Suppose we have a triangle ABC, with base BC, and draw a line l thru A
>parallel to BC.  Draw lines from A to BC, dividing BC in n segments,
>not necessarily equal.
>Now incribe a circle in each of the n small triangles.  Let h[i] be
>the distance from the top of the i'th circle to line l.
>The problem is to show that the product of the h[i] is a constant.

Note 1442.1
>Since each division produces two new triangles, it suffices to prove
>the theorem for a single division.  Induction will carry on from there.

INDUCTIVE BIT

	The product of the h[i] does depend on n.   So given that we know
the result for all integers up to n >= 1, let's prove it for n+1.   Suppose
we have two subdivisions of the line BC, determined by the points
	X_0,X_1,...,X_n
	Y_0,Y_1,...,Y_n
	Let's say that |X_i-B|=x_i, |Y_i-B|=y_i for all i=0,1,...,n, and that

	0 < x_0 < x_1 < ... < x_n < |BC|
&	0 < y_0 < y_1 < ... < y_n < |BC|

	Then if x_n=y_n, we apply the result for n to the triangle ABX_n, and 
are home.   Otherwise, x_n <> y_n.   Wlog x_n < y_n.   Since we have proved 
the theorem for n=1, we can consider the triangle AX_(n-1)C, and slide X_n
along X_(n-1)C without affecting the product of the h[i].   So we can make
x_n match y_n, and then we are home as before.

THE CASE N=1

	So, it remains to prove the result for n=1.

	Let take a triangle with sides a,b,c, altitude perpendicular to a of
length h, perimeter p and radius of incircle, r.   Then it's the work of
moments to see that:
	rp = ah (= twice the area of the triangle)
	h-2r = h(-a+b+c)/(a+b+c).

	Now we have two triangles with the same altitude h, one has sides
x,b,d, and the other has sides (a-x),c,d.   It's our task to show:
	K = h(-x+b+d)/(x+b+d) * h(-(a-x)+c+d)/((a-x)+c+d)
is independent of x.   (Note: d is a function of x.)

	Application of the cosine rule shows us that:
	ad� = xc� + (a-x)b� - ax(a-x)
and when we use this substitution we get:

	K = h�(-c�+b�+a�+2ad-2ax)/(2ab-c�+b�+a�) *
	      (-b�+c�-a�+2ad+2ax)/(2ac-b�+c�+a�)
whence:
	K = h�[4b�c� - (-a�+b�+c�)�]/[(2ab-c�+b�+a�)(2ac-b�+c�+a�)] 
duly scoured of x and d.

Andrew.