T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1402.1 | Supposed graphical aid | SUBWAY::BERG | | Mon Mar 25 1991 11:08 | 4 |
|
Sorry, I was assuming latest version of NOTES. My mistake. I cann't
include DDIF pictures in this notes files. Sorry ... :-(
|
1402.2 | Maybe this works (?) | SUBWAY::BERG | | Mon Mar 25 1991 11:11 | 19 |
1402.3 | Maybe this works | VMSDEV::HALLYB | The Smart Money was on Goliath | Mon Mar 25 1991 14:12 | 20 |
| Point of correction: distance is better termed "radius" than "diameter"
in this situation.
Also your diagram in .2 is incorrect in its calculation of c, which
should be the sqrt of the differences of the dn� values. But that
doesn't matter, since you shouldn't need to know its value.
The general formula for calculating (x,y) is:
x = r cos a
y = r sin a
Where a is the angle in radians (1 radian == 57.2958 degrees) and
r is the radius, what you have labeled d� and d�. Note a = 0 when
the point is directly to the right of the origin, at (r,0). You would
not merrily calculate with a = 1/57.2958, but rather N/57.2958 when
you are plotting the Nth point (if you expect to maintain a constant
difference of 1 degree between points).
John
|
1402.4 | Close, but no radius | SUBWAY::BERG | | Fri Mar 29 1991 10:09 | 19 |
|
Re: -1
I think that a point missed here is that we are not dealing with a true
circle, but instead randomly spaced points located about a central point.
I have no radius because d1 and d2 are NOT equal.
The problem that I have is that all of the textbooks that I have looked
at make similiar assumptions, that all angle calculations are based upon
circles. What I need is a calculation to figure out x, y coordinates
based upon triangles or other shapes that are not fixed.
Again, there must be a way to do this because it is simple to calculate
on a piece of paper. The number is always there, all that I need is a
way to calculate it.
P.S. Sorry for the delay in responding to my own problem but working in PSS,
I am frequently called away to work on other various projects and I don't
always have access to systems.
|
1402.5 | supporting the answer in .3 | CSSE::NEILSEN | Wally Neilsen-Steinhardt | Fri Mar 29 1991 12:56 | 21 |
| .4> I think that a point missed here is that we are not dealing with a true
> circle, but instead randomly spaced points located about a central point.
> I have no radius because d1 and d2 are NOT equal.
Unless I am missing something, .3 gives you the answer you want. It does not
matter whether the points are on a circle or not.
It might make things clearer if you added a subscript to r and a, like this
xi = ri cos ai
yi = ri sin ai
This works for any randomly chosen point, specified by any ri and ai. It does
not matter whether there is a circle there or not.
I gather you have a simple case in that
ai = i * a1
which can make the math simpler.
|
1402.6 | have you tried Cornu spiral? | CALS::GELINEAU | | Thu Oct 03 1991 11:48 | 6 |
| try looking at the Cornu (sp?) spiral graph; it's found in most
undergrad optics (physics) texts - i didn't look at your graphics so
i'm not sure if it will help but your original note made me think of
the spiral immediately.
Angela
|