| I wonder if these are relevant here:
<<< 2B::NOTES1:[NOTES$LIBRARY]MATH.NOTE;7 >>>
-< Mathematics at DEC >-
================================================================================
Note 1357.3 Representation of cones in R^2 3 of 4
SHIRE::ALAIND "Alain Debecker @GEO DTN 821-4912" 19 lines 21-DEC-1990 06:15
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> re .-2
>
> You twice use "positive" where I think you mean
> "nonnegative"
A matter of culture. In many countries, zero is taken as a
number both positive and negative, and the sentence "x is
smaller than y" means x <= y. In US and UK, zero is neither
positive nor negative, and "x is smaller than y" doesn't
allow for equality.
Nevertheless, you are right. I was lousy on the edges:
Note that the condition (4) is equivalent to the fact that
the cone is closed. An *open* set verifying condition (1)
to (3) is of the form K = { su + tv | s,t > 0 }. The same
demonstration holds: this time, the intersection of K and
the cone is open, thus of the form ]u,v[ instead of [u,v].
================================================================================
Note 1357.4 Representation of cones in R^2 4 of 4
CHOVAX::YOUNG "Give peace a chance." 7 lines 21-DEC-1990 11:38
-< But this is English, right? >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Re .4:
But these are fairly precise terms in English. For instance,
"Positive" in English has a precise meaning, ie. "Greater than
zero."
-- Barry
|
| Thanks for the replies.
d (2) was indeed the answer I was looking for. On triple checking I
found that both myself and my wife misread the answer sheet. We thought
the official answer was E (3) but it was D :*( (is that a red face?)
>You take the PSAT in Australia ? My but ETS has a long reach.
US citizens (like my step daughter) may take PSAT and SAT exams if
they wish. Heidi was just practicing as she is only 15 (year 10). She will
do a "real" one next year. Despite getting this question wrong, she
still managed a 96th percentile result :-).
John Gillings, Sydney CSC
|