[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference rusure::math

Title:Mathematics at DEC
Moderator:RUSURE::EDP
Created:Mon Feb 03 1986
Last Modified:Fri Jun 06 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:2083
Total number of notes:14613

1263.0. "xyz fixed, min x+y+z?" by IOSG::CARLIN (Dick Carlin IOSG, Reading, England) Mon Jul 02 1990 13:40

   As part of a more general problem I needed to prove the following:

   	(xi are positive reals, i = 1 to n)

        if Product(xi) is fixed
   	then Sum(xi) attains its least value when the xi are equal.

   Can anyone supply a proof? I'm sure I shall blush when someone provides a
   simple one.

   For n=2 it follows immediately from:

   	(x1 + x2)^2 = 4*x1*x2 + (x1 - x2)^2

   Dick
    
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
1263.1TRACE::GILBERTOwnership ObligatesMon Jul 02 1990 15:1810
Suppose there are two unequal xi.  Without loss of generality, call them x1 and x2.
replacing them with x1' = x2' = sqrt( x1 x2 ) leaves the product unchanged, but
reduces the sum of the xi, viz:

	0			<	(x1 - x2)^2	(since they're unequal)
	0			<	x1^2 - 2 x1 x2 + x2^2
	4 x1 x2			<	x1^2 + 2 x1 x2 + x2^2
	4 x1 x2			<	(x1 + x2)^2
	2 * sqrt( x1 x2 )	<	x1 + x2
	x1' + x2'		<	x1 + x2
1263.2ALLVAX::JROTHIt&#039;s a bush recording...Mon Jul 02 1990 16:3118
     Another standard way for this class of problem is via Lagrange
     multipliers.

     To minimize S = SUM(x[i]) subject to PROD(x[i]) = C, minimize instead

	S + L*(PROD(x[i])-C),	over the x's and L, the Lagrange multiplier.

     Taking partial derivatives with respect to the x's gives

	1 + L*(PROD(x[i]))/x[j] = 0, j = 1,2,...

	x[j] = -L*C, j = 1, 2, ...

     Which implies that the x's are equal at the constrained extremum.

     Still, I like the proof in .1 much better.

     - Jim
1263.3Paul Erdos (sp?) would approve!IOSG::CARLINDick Carlin IOSG, Reading, EnglandTue Jul 03 1990 11:112
    Many thanks, Peter. A very neat proof.