T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
538.1 | Crude approx. without calculus ;-( | CAD::LEVITIN | Sam Levitin | Fri Jul 18 1986 11:40 | 16 |
| Center has to lie on x = 4; Center = (4,2) is equidistant from
(2,0), (6,0), and (2,4) but it not tangent. Thus, the y-value of
the center must be less than 2. y = 1 is too low because the curve
goes through (2,2) (below (2,4)).
To estimate a solution, there are several ways without calculus.
(I've forgotten all my college calculus, anyway.) Try y = 1.5.
(by eyeball, it looks good). See if it crosses the parabola.
If it does not touch, increase y. If it touches in one point, that's
the answer. If it crosses in two points, decrease y.
This should converge quickly.
Sorry I don't have an exact method of solution (probably what was
intended).
Sam (CAD::) Levitin
|
538.2 | | GNERIC::QUAYLE | | Fri Jul 18 1986 14:24 | 39 |
| Let the point of tangency of the circle and the parabola
be (a,a^2). The center of the circle obviously lies on
the line x=4. Let the coordinates of the center be (4,k)
Since the point (6,0) is on the circle, the equation of
the circle must be (6-4)^2+(0-k)^2=r^2 -> r^2=k^2+4.
The point (a,a^2) also lies on the circle, so we also know
that (a-4)^2+(a^2-k)^2=k^2+4
(a^2-8a+16)+(a^4-2ka^2+k^2)=k^2+4
(1) a^4+a^2-8a+12=2ka^2
The general equation of the circle is (x-4)^2+(y-k)^2=r^2
Differentiating this implicitly and evaluating at (a,a^2)
will give the slope of the tangent at (a,a^2), which must
be the same for both curves.
Differentiating gives 2(x-4)+2(y-k)dy/dx=0
dy/dx=-(x-4)/(y-k)
evaluating at (a,a^2) gives dy/dx=(a-4)/(a^2-k)
The slope of the parabola at this point is just 2a,
.: 2a = (a-4)/(a^2-k)
2a^3-2ak=a-4
2ak=2a^3-a+4
(2) 2ka^2=2a^4-a^2+4a
Equating (1) and (2) gives
a^4+a^2-8a+12 = 2a^4-a^2+4a
or a^4-2a^2+12a-12=0
I don't know of any simple way to solve this, but using the
computer to provide an accurate approximation gives
a=1.0809675685
from which (1) tells us that
k=2.5186851530
r=3.2161739474
The equation is (x-4)^2+(y-2.5186851530)^2=3.2161739474^2
|
538.3 | osculating circle to a parabola | ROXIE::OSMAN | and silos to fill before I feep, and silos to fill before I feep | Fri Jul 18 1986 15:05 | 12 |
| This all reminds me of my old calculus classes (senior year, Newton South,
1970, Mr. Manhard).
One of our exercises involved finding the "osculating circle" in
a parabola. Apparantly the meaning of "osculate" is "to kiss" !
The osculating circle of a parabola is that circle which fits in
the parabola most snugly, i.e. is most tangent.
The .0 problem here may not be asking for the osculating circle,
but it reminds me of the issue.
/Eric
|
538.4 | X=4 ? | COMET::ROBERTS | Dwayne Roberts | Fri Jul 18 1986 15:56 | 3 |
|
.1 and .2 state the center must lie on X=4. Why?
|
538.5 | Kissing REALLY close | MODEL::YARBROUGH | | Fri Jul 18 1986 16:19 | 9 |
| Re .3: technically, 'osculating' means that the SECOND derivatives
are equal as well. That's not the case here: they have opposite
sign.
re .4: because x=4 is the only solution of the simultaneous
equations
(x-2)^2+(y-0)^2=r^2
(x-6)^2+(y-0)^2=r^2
determined by the known points (2,0) and (6,0) on the circle.
|
538.6 | | GNERIC::QUAYLE | | Fri Jul 18 1986 17:03 | 8 |
|
Re .4
Also, if you look at this geometrically, the perpendicular bisector
of any chord of a circle passes through the center of the circle.
The perpendicular bisector of the chord with endpoints (2,0) (6,0) is
the line x=4. So the center of the unknown circle must lie along
the line x=4.
|
538.7 | What happened to the sign | NACHO::MCMENEMY | Michael G. McMenemy | Fri Jul 18 1986 17:09 | 9 |
| Re .2
dy/dx=-(x-4)/(y-k) -> can someone explain to me where the -
sign went from this equation?
Thanks Mike
|
538.8 | Sign? What sign? | GNERIC::QUAYLE | | Mon Jul 21 1986 09:44 | 34 |
|
Whoops!
You're right, equation (2) is wrong because of the dropped sign,
it should go like this.
dy/dx = -(x-4)/(y-k) evaluated at (a,a^2) gives
dy/dx = (a-4)/(k-a^2) = 2a since the slopes are equal at the point
of tangency
a-4 = 2ka-2a^3
2a^3+a-4 = 2ka
(2) 2a^4+a^2-4a = 2ka^2
equating (1) and (2) gives
a^4+a^2-8a+12=2a^4+a^2-4a
a^4+4a-12=0
This equation is a little simpler than the other incorrect one,
but I still can't find any simple solutions. Using the computer
to calculate the solution gives
a = 1.5514798318
from which
k = 1.6179978229
r = 2.5725312841
so the equation of the circle is approximately
(x - 4)^2 + (y - 1.618 )^2 = 2.573^2
Sorry about that!
|
538.9 | 2 WAGs -- Gilbert, may we have the answer? | AURORA::HALLYB | Free the quarks! | Mon Jul 21 1986 11:13 | 22 |
| I'm a little bothered by the fact that a Calculus II problem ends up
with a quartic equation that does not factor into the product of
two polynomials with rational coefficients.
Speculation #1: The polynomial a^4 + 4a - 12 would be easily
factorable if by mistake one had a^2 + 4a - 12
or a^4 + 4a^2 - 12
and therefore the instructor assigned the problem in the mistaken
belief that the solution would just pop out.
Speculation #2: if the equation of the circle is
(x - 4)^2 + (y - 1.618 )^2 = 2.573^2
one has to wonder if the y-coordinate is in fact (1 + sqrt(5)) / 2
a.k.a. phi, the golden ratio, and the radius was maybe (phi + 5).
If #2 were the case then possibly there's some clever way to solve
the problem and get those results, but I came to the same conclusions
as prior responses (with a different sign error: a^4 - 4a - 12 (!)).
John
|
538.10 | | CLT::GILBERT | It's a Dusey | Mon Jul 21 1986 12:32 | 2 |
| I'll ask the student what the instructor said the answer should be.
Yes, it does look too difficult for a Calculus II problem.
|
538.11 | What _did_ the instructor reply? 8-) | ELIS::BUREMA | In the middle of life is if... | Thu Nov 01 1990 09:54 | 1 |
|
|
538.12 | | TRACE::GILBERT | Ownership Obligates | Thu Nov 01 1990 13:01 | 3 |
| I didn't get a clear answer from the student. He was getting swamped
by the course, and had enough new problems to work on that he didn't
care to resurrect an old one.
|
538.13 | The note that wouldn't die | ELIS::GARSON | V+F = E+2 | Thu Dec 06 1990 02:31 | 9 |
| re .*
I also end up with a^4 + 4a - 12 = 0 where a is the x-coordinate of the
point at which the circle and parabola are tangent. In addition to the
root near a = 1.55 (as previously noted) there is another root a little
less than -2. Is this other root also a solution to the problem?
Since quartics can be solved analytically, has anybody tried this? Does
anyone know the "magic substitution" like the one made for cubics?
|
538.14 | use Maple if you have it :-) | GUESS::DERAMO | Sometimes they leave skid marks. | Thu Dec 06 1990 09:29 | 4 |
| Solving quartics by hand is possible but rather painful.
I think it is covered in topic 881.
Dan
|