[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference rusure::math

Title:Mathematics at DEC
Moderator:RUSURE::EDP
Created:Mon Feb 03 1986
Last Modified:Fri Jun 06 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:2083
Total number of notes:14613

528.0. "drilling a rod" by CACHE::MARSHALL (beware the fractal dragon) Thu Jul 03 1986 09:59

    note 503 (drilling a cube) reminded me of a similar problem:
    
    	assume a solid rod of radius R, of arbritrary Length L>>R.
    drill a hole of radius R perpendicular to the long axis of the rod
    such that the center of the drill passes through the center of the
    rod.	What is the volume of material removed?
    
    sm
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
528.1TOO easy?CACHE::MARSHALLbeware the fractal dragonFri Jul 11 1986 10:347
    Is this problem so simple that none of you wizards deem it worthy
    of your attention? Probably.
    
    Well let's make it harder: Can you do it without calculus?
    
    sm
    
528.2A geometric hintMODEL::YARBROUGHMon Jul 14 1986 09:467
    Here's a hint: Consider the cross-section made in the intersection
    by a plane parallel to the axes of the cylinders. It is a square
    whose sides vary from 0 to the diameter of the cylinders, the edges
    being also parallel to the axes. The area of the square that is
    a distance h from the axis is determined by the Pythagorean theorem
    as a difference of two other squares. What other simpler solid figure
    has the same cross-sectional area? Its volume is easy to compute.
528.3it is ba-loooonCACHE::MARSHALLbeware the fractal dragonMon Jul 14 1986 14:3616
    re .2:
    
    "what other simpler solid figure has the same cross-sectional area?"
    
    well...are you thinking of an octahedron? it has the same cross-section
    but the function of side-length to h is not the same.
    
    this object (the shape of the volume removed) is like an inflated
    octahedron.
    
    BTW, I have calculated the volume, using calculus. I won't post
    it here, it was pretty trivial.
    
    BUT can it be done without calculus?
    
    sm(ile)
528.4Well, it's related to an octahedronMODEL::YARBROUGHMon Jul 14 1986 15:299
    The simpler figure, it turns out, is a cube with pyramids hollowed
    out from opposite sides and meeting with their common apex at the
    center. This figure and the intersection of two circular cylinders
    have exactly the same cross-sectional area at the same distance
    from the center, therefore the same volume. I think it works out
    to 2/3 d^3, or 16/3 r^3.
    
    If you cut the cube in half and flip the halves over, you get a
    cube with an enclosed octahedral cavity.
528.5CLT::GILBERT$ no /nono vaxnotesMon Jul 14 1986 20:3724
Let the radius of the rod be R and the radius of the hole be r, with R >= r.

			|  ROD	|
			|	|
		    ----+-------+----
			|	|hole
		    ----+-------+----
			|	|
			|	|

Now as we take cross-sections, each is a rectangle (above is the
cross-section at its widest).  If the distance from the center is x,
the sides of the rectangle are 2 sqrt(r�-x) and 2 sqrt(R�-x�).  The
volume of material removed is given by the integral:

	    _ +r
	4  /     sqrt(r�-x) sqrt(R�-x�) dx
	 _/   -r

However, this seems too dificult, so we consider only the case R=r.

	    _ +r			  ] +r
	4  /     (r�-x�) dx = 4(r�x-x�/3) ]    = 16 r� / 3
	 _/   -r			  ] -r