[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference rusure::math

Title:Mathematics at DEC
Moderator:RUSURE::EDP
Created:Mon Feb 03 1986
Last Modified:Fri Jun 06 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:2083
Total number of notes:14613

515.0. "e^pi larger than pi^e ??" by SIERRA::OSMAN (and silos to fill before I feep, and silos to fill before I feep) Mon Jun 16 1986 17:22

    Which is larger, e^pi or pi^e ?  Demonstrate WITHOUT NUMERICAL
    APPROXIMATION.
    
    /Eric
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
515.1CLT::GILBERTJuggler of NoterdomMon Jun 16 1986 21:5523
Well, we know that

	e^(1/e) > pi^(1/pi) > 1

so raising each of these to the power e*pi > 0 gives:

	e^pi > pi^e > 1.

You may well ask how we 'know' that first equation.  Well, the
function x^(1/x) is continuous over the range epsilon to infinity,
and has a local maxima at x = e, since the derivative of x^(1/x) is:

	d x^(1/x) /dx = d e^(ln(x)/x) /dx
		= e^(ln(x)/x) [ ln(x)(-x^-2) + x^-2 ]
		= x^(1/x) (1-ln(x)) / x�,

and this is zero only at x = e (in the range epsilon to infinity),
and so x = e is either a local minima or maxima.  Furthermore, because

	1^(1/1) < 2^(1/2) = 4^(1/4),

we conclude that x^(1/x) is concave downward, so x = e is a maxima.
Thus, e^(1/e) >= x^(1/x) for *any* positive x, including pi.
515.2LATOUR::JMUNZERTue Jun 17 1986 14:248
    I believe that 508.6 and 512.2 both supply the answer to .0.
    
    If .1 is hidden from all but its author and the moderator, is it
    a lot like a WOM[*]?
    
    John
    
    [*]  write only memory
515.3An alternative proofAUSSIE::GARSONWed Jun 17 1992 00:2322
    e^x = 1 + x + x^2/2! + x^3/3! + ... (1)
    
    so for x>0, e^x > 1 + x		(2)
    
       pi > e (an assumption)
    
    => pi/e > 1
    => pi/e - 1 > 0
    
    so let x = pi/e - 1 in (2)
    
       e^(pi/e - 1) > 1 + pi/e - 1
    
    => e^(pi/e) / e > pi/e
    => e^(pi/e) > pi
    
    => e^pi > pi^e
    
    (This proof is not mine but it seemed suitably elementary by comparison
     with the previous proof to be worth posting. Naturally from (1) it is
     easy to see that d/dx e^x = e^x and from there the result using
     calculus follows.)