Title: | Mathematics at DEC |
Moderator: | RUSURE::EDP |
Created: | Mon Feb 03 1986 |
Last Modified: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Number of topics: | 2083 |
Total number of notes: | 14613 |
20 years ago, Wagner made the following conjecture: Any list of graphs with no graph contained in any other must be finite. The conjecture is still open. Reference --------- Gina Kolata, Graph Theory Result Proved, Science 224 (4 May 1984) 480-481.
T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
157.1 | HARE::STAN | Mon Sep 24 1984 16:17 | 10 | ||
The term "contained in" was not defined, but I think they must mean more than set containment. I think they mean the same thing as when you say any nonplanar graph "contains" a copy of K or K . 5 3,3 For otherwise, the infinite set of cycles, of lengths 3,4,5,6, etc. is such that none contains another. However, in the broader sense, the cycle of length 4 "contains" a cycle of length 3 by coalescing two vertices. |