Title: | Mathematics at DEC |
Moderator: | RUSURE::EDP |
Created: | Mon Feb 03 1986 |
Last Modified: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Number of topics: | 2083 |
Total number of notes: | 14613 |
Here is another interesting sequence I learned about at Dave Roselle's talk: Start with a sequence beginning with two 0's. Place a 1 next to them and then skip 1 space and place a second 1. Then place a 2 in the first unoccupied position in the sequence. Skip 2 spaces and place another 2. So far we have: 0 0 1 2 1 * 2 * * * where "*" denotes an as-yet unoccupied position. Then place a 3 in the first (leftmost) unoccupied position and skip 3 spaces and place another 3. Then place a 4, skip 4 spaces, and place another 4. This gives 0 0 1 2 1 3 2 4 * 3 * * 4 * * * . It can be proven that you can always continue to do this (i.e. when you go to place your second "k" you will never find that that position is already occupied.) You get the following sequence: 0 0 1 2 1 3 2 4 5 3 6 7 4 8 5 9 ... Furthermore, it can be proven that the leftmost position of the number n occurs in position [(n+1)(1+sqrt(5))/2] where the brackets denote the floor function. -------------------- A related problem where little is known is this: Start with 1 and at each stage, find the leftmost position in which you can place the next number, k, skip k positions, then place a second k, skip k positions, and then place a third k. For example, this process begins with 1 * 1 2 1 * 2 3 4 2 5 3 * 4 * 3 5 * 4 * * * where "*" denotes an as-yet unoccupied position. Note that if you can't place all three k's, then you have chosen the wrong initial position and you should go on to the next one. For example, 2 could not have been placed in the 2nd position above since this would have required a second 2 to be placed at position 5, but a 1 is already at position 5. So 2 got placed at the next available position (position 4). The following questions are still open: (a) does position 2 ever get filled in by some number? (b) find a formula for the leftmost position for the integer n.
T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
140.1 | TURTLE::GILBERT | Sat Aug 25 1984 03:51 | 13 | ||
Regarding the "harder problem". Le Computer shows that position 2 is not filled by any number less than 32000. It's a safe bet that it's never filled. The left-most position of the number n is given (very roughly) by n*2.215. An analysis giving the exact value of this constant (as n approaches infinity) shouldn't be very difficult. If the problem "places the pattern" 0,n,2*n, then a generalization is to place the pattern 0,f1(n),f2(n),...,fm(n), where each f(n) is a strictly increasing function of n. I suspect the generalized problem leaves at most a finite number of "holes". |