Title: | Mathematics at DEC |
Moderator: | RUSURE::EDP |
Created: | Mon Feb 03 1986 |
Last Modified: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Number of topics: | 2083 |
Total number of notes: | 14613 |
I had a problem published in the current issue of the Journal of Recreational Mathematics (volume 16, number 2) that I devised with the help of a computer: Problem 1292: a) For some n, partition the first n perfect squares into two sets of the same size and same sum. b) For some n, partition the first n triangular numbers into two sets of the same size and same sum. c) For some n, partition the first n perfect cubes into two sets of the same size and same sum. d) For some n, partition the first n perfect fourth powers into two sets of the same size and same sum. This problem is still "open" if you want to send your solution in to them.
T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
9.1 | HARE::STAN | Wed Feb 15 1984 11:43 | 24 | ||
A more general result was published as a problem in the January issue of the American Mathematical Monthly 91(1984)57. Problem E3032, proposed by J. O. Shallit: Let d and r be integers with d>1 and r>0. Let p be a polynomial with real coefficients and deg(p)<r. Show how to partitiion the set S = { p(0), p(1), p(2), ... , p(d^r-1) } into d disjoint subsets whose union is S, such that the sum of each subset is the same. --------------------------------- Now in my problem, p(x) was (x+1)^n, so the above result says that the first 2^3=8 squares can be partitioned into two sets with the same sum; the first 2^4=16 cubes can be partitioned into two sets with the same sum; the first 2^5=32 4th powers can be partitioned into two sets with the same sum; the first 2^6=64 5th powers can be partitioned into two sets with the same sum; Of course, Shallit's result says nothing about whether this number is minimal. It also doesn't require the sets to each have the same cardinality. But it's a nice result anyhow. | |||||
9.2 | HARE::STAN | Wed Feb 15 1984 12:09 | 14 | ||
From: METOO::YARBROUGH 15-FEB-1984 12:06 To: HARE::STAN Subj: 5th powers Stan; 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 3 +4 +7 +8 +9 +11 +12 +13 +17 +21 +22 +23 = 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 1 +2 +5 +6 +10 +14 +15 +16 +18 +19 +20 +24 Lynn Yarbrough | |||||
9.3 | METOO::YARBROUGH | Wed Feb 15 1984 13:53 | 21 | ||
2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 a) 1 +4 +6 +7 = 2 +3 +5 +8 b) T1 + T2 + T6 = T2 + T4 + T5 (1 + 6 + 21 = 3 + 10 + 15) 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 c) 1 + 2 + 4 + 8 + 9 + 12 = 3 + 5 + 6 + 7 + 10 + 11 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 d) 1 +2 +3 +6 +9 +10 +14 +19 +20 = 4 +5 +7 +8 +12 +13 +15 +16 +17 +18 finally, 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 1 +2 +5 +6 +10 +14 +15 +16 +18 +19 +20 +24 = 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 3 +4 +7 +8 +9 +11 +12 +13 +17 +21 +22 +23 - Lynn Yarbrough | |||||
9.4 | HARE::STAN | Wed Jan 16 1985 04:35 | 11 | ||
Kenneth M. Wilke outdid us all in his published solution in vol 17, issue 2 of JORM: He found one single partition of the first 32 positive integers that simultaneously solved all 4 parts of my problem: {1,4,6,7,10,11,13,16,18,19,21,24,25,28,30,31} {2,3,5,8,9,12,14,15,17,20,22,23,26,27,29,32} A neat hack! |