T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
573.1 | yeah, here's one | SKIF::CJOHNSON | | Thu Mar 29 1990 17:03 | 16 |
| I just picked up a book called the T-factor diet, which is a low-fat
diet. There are two possible sequences described in it, for a
'crash' program, and a more gradual program.
The book is available in paperback also, and the writer is a
professional from Vanderbilt University. He has some points about
metabolic function in converting proteing, carbohydrates, fats, etc.,
which seem to make a lot of sense.
For 4.95 plus tax, it'll give you some direction for at least 2 or 3
weeks on either program -- 4 to 6 if you combine both (I suppose then
you could 'resequence'!
CJ
|
573.2 | | SNOC01::MYNOTT | Hugs to all Kevin Costner lookalikes | Thu Mar 29 1990 20:14 | 10 |
| Rather than enter my diet, I highly recommend the series (3) of books
by Covert Bailey - Fit or Fat, Fit or Fat Target Diet, Fit or Fat for
Women. His plan is low fat, low protein, high carbs and exercise. I
have been following his plan for 5 months (yesterday) and am down 73lbs
and more importantly 5 clothing sizes!!!!
Good luck,
...dale
|
573.3 | "25mg fat per day" | VICKI::GUTRO | | Fri Mar 30 1990 09:44 | 62 |
|
First of all, let me say that this is my first time in this conference
so if I say something that's already been said elsewhere, please
forgive me, and if it's a bit long (and it is) it's only because I
want to show you that I've been where you are and perhaps in some small
way I can help. Here goes...
Anyway, I'd like to share some advice that I received about a year ago
when I was told by my physician that I was on the verge of moving into
the "high risk" heart disease catergory because I was overweight and
my blood pressure/cholesterol was skyrocketing. After scaring the hell
out of me with this statement, he then advised that I see the dietician
who was affiliated with his practice. I agree and made an appointment but
because he was booked solid I had to wait several weeks to see him.
Meanwhile, over that 2 week period I put myself on a diet. It was my own
version of all the "fad diet" books I had read, advice I had been
given, etc. Well when I finally walked into the dietician's his office
I was pretty cocky. I had, in my opinion, been eating all the "right"
foods in fact I had kept a written log of my daily intake. Boy, will I
show this guy I thought. After sharing with him what I had eaten over the
past two weeks he proceeded to knock me for a loop when in cool fashion
he tore "my" diet apart. In his opinion, it wasn't so much that I was
eating the right foods, the problem was the way I was going about it.
Well enough for background info, let me get to the advice part. He
told me that the key to me controlling my weight and at the same time
get my cholesterol down to an acceptable level as well was to
follow this regimen .....
...limit your fat intake to 25mg per day. Eat as much as your body
wants but stick to this rule!! Now, one pat of butter = 5mg, one 6 oz
piece of chicken, fish or beef = 5mg, so whenever you sit down for a meal
make sure that the ratio of vegetables to poultry, fish or beef is
6::1, that is six parts veggies to one part other. In addition, eat as
much fiber as possible, lots of fruits etc., and he gave me a chart
that listed the fiber content of a broad range of foods so I could
monitor my progress towards this goal.
Over the first month I stuck to this advice, but belive me I ate, and
ate, and ate, to the point where I thought I'd bust. Whenever I felt
the urge to eat, I ate but I kept that one RULE in mind while I ate,
"25mg of fat/day". After the first two weeks I noticed that I began to
lose. A pound here and a pound there at first but as I progressed into
week three and then four, things began looking like a melt-down. I was
astounded. It seemed the more I ate, the more I lost! After the first
month I had dropped a cool 17 pounds. I began to gain some momentum,
encouraged by these incredible results. I continued to eat, although
I was gorging myself as I had the first month. Nonetheless I ate and
ate and the the weight continued to vanish. In retrospect, it was
a little difficult to change the mix of what I was eating but as time
wore on it got easier and easier. Two, three then four months passed.
I tallied the results, I had lost 39 pounds in a little less than four
months and there were no signs that it would stop. It did stop
eventually but I've been able to maintain everything I lost by just
sticking to that one rule of ---> 25mg of fat/day <--- in closing let
me give you all the encouragement I can and say that it can be done.
God knows, it's not easy but maybe this little bit of advice will help
you along the way.
|
573.4 | Help!! | MSDOA::MCMULLIN | | Fri Mar 30 1990 10:57 | 7 |
| re .3
Does this apply to both males and females or do you know if it's
different? Thanks.
Virginia
|
573.5 | | SKIF::CJOHNSON | | Fri Mar 30 1990 18:20 | 11 |
| If you read the T-factor diet, you will see that the elimination of
a large part of fat is what does it -- and from everything else I've
been reading, it makes sense. I've been talking to some dietitians
bout it, and their cut at it is 'fat -> stored fat at about 97%
efficiency, whereas proteins and carbohydrates are anywhere from
50% on down, depending on what you are doing, etc.
Take a look at it -- I think the 25mg sounds good.
cj
|
573.6 | | CALLME::MR_TOPAZ | | Sat Mar 31 1990 08:28 | 15 |
| The information in .3 and .5 is totally incompetent, to the point
of being potentially dangerous. I assume that it's because
the people who wrote these notes don't understand the difference
between a milligram (1/1000th of a gram) and a gram.
25mg of fat would not take long to consume. A single ounce of
cooked turkey (white meat, no skin) has 210mg of fat; an ear of
cooked corn (no butter) has 1000mg of fat.
Sorry for the flame, and I'll assume that the 25mg suggestion was
an unintentional error, but people might do themselves significant
harm if they were to take your information at face value.
--Mr Topaz
|
573.7 | | SNOC01::MYNOTT | Hugs to all Kevin Costner lookalikes | Sun Apr 01 1990 21:11 | 10 |
| I think it was meant to be 25 gram of fat.
They are right, it does work. But, I keep my fat intake down under
18 gram a day. With my calorie intake of 1400 or there abouts, my fat
intake is about 12-13%. It does drop to 11% during the week, but at the
weekends I sometimes use a 50% less fat cheese with my meal, so it ups a
bit.
...dale
|
573.8 | you're right mg .NE. g | SKIF::CJOHNSON | | Mon Apr 02 1990 15:17 | 62 |
| Yeah, I misread 'mg'. Assumed it meant grams. I guess that's an
example of a scotoma -- or seeing what you want to see.
The American Heart Association and the US government have both recently
lowered the recommended level of percentage of calories in your diet
from 30% to less than 30%. If your body size and activity level were
such that you required 1600 calories a day to maintain you weight, then
the fat content of such a diet would be 480 calories from fat, which at
approximately 9 calories per gram would be approx 43 to 44 grams of
fat. Clearly a diet of 25 grams of fat for such a person would be a
level of only 14% total calories from fat.
Since fat is converted to body fat at an efficiency of some 97%, vs an
efficiency of conversion of between 40% and 60% for carbohydrates and
proteins, it's easy to see why such a diet is:
1. Beneficial to the heart (by lowering lipid levels
2. A diet that might result in either weightloss or easier
weight maintenance.
In case I sound rather pedantic about this, it's because I am. I had
a heart attack some 5 years ago, a triple bypass, and have become a
student of proper diet since (not that I have always had the sense or
discipline to follow the proper precepts at all times!).
Strangely enough, to digress, although I always had _low_ total
cholesterol readings (generally from 165 to 175 mg/dl; it was not until
I suffered the heart attack that they did a cardiogram, and discovered
the plaque deposits that necessitated the bypass.
I was informed (slightly after the fact), that although my cholesterol
levels were exemplary, my LDL/HDL ratios (low-density lipoproteins/
high-density lipoproteins or simply "bad-guy"/"good guys" ratio,
generally it should be 4.0 or less, mine was 7+) was NOT exemplary.
The _ONLY_ way to correct this, according to my surgeon, the cardiologist,
my family physician, and the dietitian that supervised my recovery, was to
do three things:
1. Exercise a lot -- not weight-lifting, but aerobic exercise
(that makes HDL's increase so your ratio gets smaller)
2. Consume a lot of fats with EPA (a type of fish oil - say cod
liver oil), at least 1 to 2 oz per day (which now adds 270
to 540 calories of fat to your diet IN ADDITION to whatever
the 'hidden' fat content of your food is), the net result
being a diet with perhaps 40% of it's calories from fat.
3. Embrace the 'low-fat regimen' of fish, skinned poultry, and
vegetables, with as little fat as possible.
From my reading of the T-factor diet, although the writers approach it
in a different way, their 'diet' is a low-fat diet. And, virtually
every other reputable diet book I have read, upon inspection, turns out
to be a 'low-fat' diet.
The only other thing to watch out for is sodium, and that's a story for
another day.
CJ
|
573.9 | Fat Gram Counter | MFGMEM::HELENIC | | Tue Apr 17 1990 17:40 | 23 |
|
I recently bought the "T-Factor Fat Gram Counter", which is a small
booklet that contains a listing of foods & their fat contents. I'm
trying to log my daily fat intake and keep it within the 20-40 gram
target (for men it's 30-60 grams). I'm amazed how much fat is in
food & how quickly you can reach 20+ grams. I gave up fast foods
a while back - good thing, a Burger King double beef Whopper with
cheese has 60 grams of fat in it!!! I guess that's not too surprising,
however, there are a number of foods listed that I didn't know had
that much fat, for instance:
1 medium avocado 30 g.
1/2 c. tofu 11 g.
2 oz link sausage 20 g.
2 T. sunflower seeds 9 g.
3.5 oz duck w/skin 28 g.
3 egg omelet w/cheese 40 g.
The booklet also contains the fiber grams and calorie contents.
Cost $1.95
Audrey
|
573.10 | | SALEM::WATKEVITCH | | Wed Apr 18 1990 10:52 | 7 |
|
Audrey,
Where did you buy it??
|
573.11 | Waldenbooks | MFGMEM::HELENIC | | Thu Apr 19 1990 11:54 | 6 |
|
I bought it at Waldenbooks in the Auburn (MA) mall.
Audrey
|
573.12 | carrots | SOLVIT::HAECK | Debby Haeck | Wed Aug 11 1993 19:13 | 6 |
| Guess this is as good a string to reply to for my questiona as any...
I just bought a bag of pre-cut carrots to snack on. The nutrition
chart on the back says that a serving of 2.8 oz there is 1 gram of fat.
FAT IN CARROTS????? That's a new one on me.
|
573.13 | 1gm of fat is about 0.8gm too high | HDLITE::ZARLENGA | Michael Zarlenga, MRO AXP BPDA | Sun Aug 15 1993 21:14 | 17 |
| .12> I just bought a bag of pre-cut carrots to snack on. The nutrition
.12> chart on the back says that a serving of 2.8 oz there is 1 gram of fat.
The standard carrot, 100gm, has 0.2 gm fat, according to the Nutrition
Almanac, c1975, p214.
To convert grams to ounces, remember there are 454 grams per pound, and
16 ounces per pound ...
1 ounce 16 ounces
100 grams * --------- * --------- = 3.52 ounces
454 grams 1 pound
Are there any other ingredients listed?
Does the label say 1gm or less than 1gm?
|
573.14 | carrots | CSLALL::BSMITH | | Wed Aug 18 1993 18:44 | 9 |
| Carrots are excellent as they have beta carotene in them and are a good
source of vitamins.
Someone told me that they roast a lot of vegetables (i.e., carrots,
turnip, etc.) and they are very good. Brings out a sweet taste in them.
They just spray the pan (they use a turkey pan) and cook at 350 degrees for
whatever length of time is needed.
|