T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
563.1 | Make it a PRIORITY ! | CNTROL::JENNISON | | Mon Mar 05 1990 16:31 | 49 |
|
Jim,
I know what you're saying about a busy schedule - somedays
it just seems there's no way to fit it all in. However, once
you make exercise part of your routine, AND a priority, not
only does it fit in, but it gives you energy to do all those
other little things.
You mentioned winding down after work - I use my workouts to wind
down. If I didn't get right to it before anything else when work
is over, half the time I wouldn't do it.
There are three keys to successful exercise: Frequency, Intensity,
and Duration.
Frequency = 3 to 5 times a week
Intensity = 60%-80% of your target heart range
Duration = 20 minutes minimum
(I was going to put this in a reply to another note, so there may
be more here than you're interested in :-) )
Many people think that if they can't workout every day, then they
won't make progress. Others think that ten minutes every day is
better than 3 half hour workouts per week. The best way to get
started is to pick the low end of the above ranges (3 times a week,
20 minutes at 60 percent of you target heart rate) and slowly
work your way up. (People just starting out, with little exercise
history and lots of weight to lose, may need to start out with less
than 20 minutes in the target range).
Suggestions for getting started :
o Go for long walks - could your wife take walks with you ? That's
a great way to chat and have some "quality time" while getting your
exercise
o Walk at lunchtime
o Jog at lunchtime
o Go straight from work to a health club for an hour
o Workout in the morning
Hope some of this helps!!!
Karen
|
563.2 | | SNOC01::MYNOTT | Hugs to all Kevin Costner lookalikes | Tue Mar 06 1990 01:55 | 23 |
| One other point on the last note. The longer you keep your heartrate
at 65% the more *fat* you'll burn up, and after all, that's what you
want, fat off, not weight...(^'
I made myself get up at 5am and start walking. I started with 2mile,
then built up to 6 mile. Now, I've added 2 aquarobic classes and
rowing. But I made a very very conscious decision to exercise with the
weight loss and have now become so addicted I can't stop. My job makes
it very hard to break at lunch or after work, and mornings suit me.
If you increase your heartrate to 75% before you've lost your fat,
you'll lose more muscle than fat. The best way to guage this is to
take measurements, when they drop you know you're losing fat, when the
scales drop suddenly and in large amounts, you know you've dropped lean.
I'm now the same size I was 12 years ago, but I weigh 20lbs more. When
I finally reach the level I'm meant to be, I'll weigh 26lbs more but be
the same size.
Good luck...
...dale
|
563.3 | Keep the muscle, lose the fat | CNTROL::JENNISON | | Tue Mar 06 1990 08:04 | 42 |
|
Dale,
I think your loss is very impressive, along with your attitude!
Keep it up!
One thing in your message I wanted to clarify though...
It is believed that if you work out at the lower end of your
target range, you will burn more fat than carbohydrates, and
that you should exercise longer than when you are at a higher
rate (It varies between individuals, but for some period of
time when you start to exercise, you burn carbos. As the duration
increases, you begin to burn fat, then slowly more fat and less
carbos, but you never burn just fat. I've heard 15 minutes before
you start to burn fat, but like I said, it varies from person to
person.)
However, exercising at 75% of your maximum heart rate will NOT
cause you to burn muscle. You do not 'burn' protein when
you exercise, and muscle is much harder to lose than you think.
The phenomena you describe with the scales is this. When the
scales are dropping, you are most likely burning lots of fat
and building some muscle. When the scales are constant, you
are most likely adding as much muscle as the fat you are losing.
When the scales go up (and you are following a regimen like yours),
you are probably adding more lean than the fat you are losing.
Of course, if you are not exercising and are not eating properly,
the above does not apply :-)
Just wanted to clear up a couple things, because there is still
a lot of confusion surrounding lean body tissue. I love your
approach to weightloss and know personally how well it works!
Just don't be afraid to go up to 75% percent of your maximum
heart rate... it's good for the old cardiovascular system, and won't
harm your progress!!!
Karen
|
563.4 | | SNOC01::MYNOTT | Hugs to all Kevin Costner lookalikes | Thu Mar 08 1990 02:06 | 22 |
| Thanks Karen, whatever it was, I lost 3% fat last month. To date, I've
lost 14% and have 9% to go. I work out six days a week for a minimum
of 60mins one day and 105mins the other five. For me, the longer I
workout at the lowest end it is much more satisfying than doing any
high impact workouts. They do have them in aquarobics where I workout.
I like most need to enjoy what I'm doing to maintain. Funnily enough,
walking up steep hills is one of my favourite times during my 6 miles.
The liferower this weekend, should be interesting, and I'll just increase
it to 20mins each session. As long as I have my walkman in the gym I'm
fine.
But, exercise is addictive. I can't imagine not getting up and going
out. My one day of rest is when I have guests over each week.
Now all I have to do is find a way to continue with it all when I'm in
the States in May. (^'
Thanks again,
...dale
|
563.5 | | CNTROL::JENNISON | | Thu Mar 08 1990 08:20 | 16 |
|
That's great Dale!
I hope I didn't sound as though I was criticizing your
methods, exactly the opposite. I only meant to clarify
the "muscle loss" theory.
Also, you are right about liking what you are doing. I switch
off with my exercise every time (stairmaster, running, aerobics,
treadmill) so I don't get bored.
Keep up the great work!
Karen
|
563.6 | Same here | YUPPY::DAVIESA | Grail seeker | Thu Mar 08 1990 08:47 | 35 |
|
Re .0
Boy, does that sound familiar.
I'm in just the same position - I commute to work, and find myself
with 2 hours of private time a day in which to eat, talk to my SO,
and make sure my cats still recognise me!
I get demotivated when, occasionally, I do get time to do a half-hour
of something because I know it won't be regular, so I don't bother.
On hating exercise generally - I've been a total sloth since
schooldays. In fact, while I was at school too. I started running
though about six months back (before work intervened) and to my
amazement it was very enjoyable after the first week or so. I'd
like to find time to do it again.
On fitting it in - I agree that it can be a real problem.
I got up at 5.00am for a while to run, but I ended up so tired from
lack of sleep at the end of a week that it didn't seem worth it.
One interesting comment I came across in the T-Factor diet book......
If you're inactive, and you start fat-burning-type exercise
(I.e.aerobic), you may see the scales go up a couple of pounds
temporarily. Apparently your muscles, startled by the call to action,
load on some extra glycogen (=quick energy) to be ready for next
time. Glycogen binds with water, so you retain a bit more water
than usual. Y'know this stuff - it's the same magic water that you
lose when you start a daft diet. ;-)
'gail
|
563.7 | "Slender-You" - Does anybody know???? | VNABRW::TRAXLER_B | garfield's still alive .... | Mon Mar 12 1990 06:35 | 27 |
| My problem is almost the same as the base note. I have to loose between
16.5 and 22 pounds (for more details see my intro in 2.216) and I *know*
that I can only do it by starting exercising again. I was always doing
some kind of Ballet and Jazz-Dancing until I stopped about 3 years ago.
And since then my body gained and gained.
The only thing I would maybe like to do again is Jazz-Dancing, but it's not
easy when you are so heavy, all the running, jumping and turning. And, also,
it doesn't look very nice ..... I tried Squash, Aerobics, Weith-lifting,
and a lot more but I did those things only because I *had to* and not
because I liked it - no sense, I guess.
Maybe that's one reason why I lost interest in it. Others are for sure lack
of time and lots of other interest. (My main-hobby are books, I can sit
and read for hours....and it's soooo comfortable to eat something meanwhile...)!
Well, and now I have heard of a "Slender-You" program here. Does any of you
have experience with this? They tell you, you won't loose weight but inches -
well, never mind what the scales say, I wanna look good!
I would appreciate any inputs to this question. If you don't know what
this program is, I will explain it, but as it comes from the USA I guess
you people out there will know quite a lot about it?
Thanks for any help,
Billie
|
563.8 | Slender You pointer | ATSE::BLOCK | I've Seen the Promised Land | Mon Mar 12 1990 16:35 | 7 |
|
There's some discussion of Slender You (and other such salons) in
topic 66.
Beverly
|