[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference rocks::weight_control

Title: Weight Loss and Maintenance
Notice:**PLEASE** enter notes in mixed case (CAPS ARE SHOUTING)!
Moderator:ASICS::LESLIE
Created:Mon Jul 09 1990
Last Modified:Tue Jun 03 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:933
Total number of notes:9931

520.0. "T Factor Diet" by QBUS::FLEMING (Do y'all speak Southern?) Mon Oct 09 1989 11:50

    Has anyone heard of a diet called the "T FACTOR"? Supposedly is
    monitors your fat intake to 20 grams per day. Please advise if
    you know where to get it. Thanks.
    
    Anne

T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
520.1Reader's DigestSKIVT::L_BURKEI know I have faults ...Mon Oct 09 1989 13:247
    Reader's Digest had it in the October issue.  The only guideline
    is to keep your fat intake between 20 - 40 grams of fat (for women).
    I think it may be 30 - 50 for men.  I'm trying to work to this but
    it's harder than I imagined.
    
    Linda B

520.2low fat can mean future cravings ... STRONG cravingsANT::ZARLENGAhear me now, beleaf me lata, my frenMon Oct 09 1989 13:5812
	That is very low in fat.
    
    	Pritikin, one of the most strict, isn't even that bad (but it's
    close).
    
    	Typically, low fat diets set up the dieter for binges, when
    the cravings for fat finally become overwhelming.  If you do binge,
    do it on low fat foods, if you can.

    -mike z

520.3Grams of fat and percentage...USCTR2::ZAPPIAI give a tusk about elephantsWed Nov 15 1989 15:5536
	RE: .1

	It can be hard to stick to this guideline especially if you eat
	such things as a typical serving of potato chips consisting of 
	10 gm. fat or other such fatty foods.

	I prefer a combination of keeping the number of fat grams low
	and watching the overall percentage of fat throughout the day,
	but at the same time not going overboard.  My opinion.

	If I'm not mistaken it's possible to limit yourself to 20 gm.
	fat meals but if it turns out the for the day you ate 50% fat
	then that's defeats the purpose.  

	I also believe some people are better off simply eating wholesome
	high nutrient/low fat nourishing foods, carefully reading labels, 
	an occasional "goodie", and adequate exercise rather than the
	all too often "loose x lbs in n days" diets.  Also, this has
	probably been discussed elsewhere but the word "diet" itself
	can possibly be self-defeating in terms of how some people
	relate it, whereas adopting a change in lifestyle and eating
	habits sounds more positive.

	I can't compare the difference of eating say an apple and banana
	as a desert (actually I hear that for digestion purposes eating
	the fruit first is easier on your system, but I'm not sure on
	this one) to a cheese cake and/or chocolate cake which I could
	easily eat and not be the least bit full after a slice whereas
	the more bulkier foods will satisfy me.  I also believe it's
	related to the time it takes to eat.  For example, eating a 
	salad at midday as opposed to a sandwich or two that a hungry
	person could easily "woof" down fast.

	- Jim