| How much do we know about carbohydrates and their effect
on the human body? Well, we know that carbohydrates are the
fuel that the human body uses during physical activity. But
what about their effect on brain function, in specific mood
and mental awareness?
Say "sugar", and most people will think "stimulant". This
is a myth that has just recently been exposed. The confusion
came about when studying hyperactive children - they tend to
consume much more sugar than 'normal' children. But new evi-
dence concludes that the sugar consumption is an effect, not
a cause. Sugar, and carbohydrates in general, are not stimu-
lants.
Rather, the carbohydrate effect is to calm or even fatigue
people. A decrease in alertness and longer reaction times are
also common. This effect is intensified by eating an unbalanced-
carbohydrate meal, a meal with excessive amounts of sugars and
starches but with minimal amounts of protein. It has been shown
that a small amount of protein, will block or lessen the carbohy-
drate effect.
So, how do carbohydrates calm and fatigue? The Wurtman
model, developed by Richard Wurtman while at MIT, has shown
that the metabolism of carbohydrates is a complex physiological
process that leads to increased levels of serotonin in the brain.
It is this serotonin that is responsible for the mood changes
that are observed.
The focal point of the Wurtman model is the blood-brain
barrier [ ed : note that the recent rash of AIDS research has
_confirmed_ the existence of a blood-brain barrier ], where
blood borne chemicals compete for entry into the brain. One
of the chemical competitors is tryptophan, an amino acid. Once
inside the brain, tryptophan is converted into serotonin among
other things.
So how do carbohydrates, which are not necessarily rich
in tryptophan, cause this? Carbohydrates cause a release of
insulin into the bloodstream. A consequence of this insulin
release is that most of tryptophan's blood-barrier competitors
are moved into muscles and other tissues. This raises the
relative concentration of tryptophan in the blood, and also
the relative concentration of serotonin in the brain.
Voila` ... a tranquilizing effect from what was long sus-
pected to be a stimulant. This new evidence is not yet conclu-
sive, but all new evidence to date is supportive.
-mike z
|
| If you were diagnosed as hypoglycemic more then 3 years ago,
and if the test given was the glucose tolerance test (you drink
a very sweet liquid, then give blood samples every hour), you might
want to consider repeating it.
This test is known now to place an unrealistic demand on the
pancreas to produce insulin. Some people who have mild pancreas
dysfunction will be diagnosed as hypoglycemic incorrectly. The
newer test uses a less concentrated sugar solution.
True hypoglycemia is relatively uncommon ... approx 30% of those
diagnosed with it before 1984 actually have it. The actual percentage
is something like 2% of the population.
-mike z
|
| Yes, I was diagnosed last fall as definitely being hypoglycemic.
The 5 hour glucose test proved it even after 3 hours. I had
been having symptoms that were all vague, but an article with
7 of the symptoms suggested that a person be tested. I also
have diabetes in both sides of my parents. The doctor told me
that hypoglycemia is a forerunner to diabetes if I didn't get
it under control. Take off weight, 6 small meals a day and no
sugar. He says if it tastes sweet, you can't eat it. I feel
alot better since I watch what I eat. No caffeine either as it
tends to lower your sugar level.
Good luck,
|