T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
232.1 | | CSC32::G_MCINTOSH | | Wed Feb 24 1988 14:44 | 9 |
| You know, I really don't like to come down on other people's things,
but this diet is a bute! What is it supposed to do? Is it,
theoretically for weightloss? Is it designed to give you indigestion?
This really looks like a horrible diet, and before anyone kills
me, I'll add, "in my opinion".
Glenn
|
232.2 | Another dissenting vote | STAR::YANKOWSKAS | Wanna buy a stadium? | Thu Feb 25 1988 06:34 | 20 |
| re .1:
My sentiments exactly.
The thing that makes it difficult to me to take this plan seriously
is not so much the foods that it contains, but the fact that this
is a "10-day diet plan". What does one do at the end of ten days?
Go back to the same eating habits that got him/her overweight in
the first place?
10-day diets, 3-day diets, and the like are in my opinion okay for
taking weight off, but useless for keeping it off. The only way to
obtain a *permanent* weightloss is to make a sensible eating regimen a
*permanent* part of one's lifestyle.
Paul
|
232.3 | RE .2 | WONDER::COYLE | Only 48.8% of my former self! | Thu Feb 25 1988 08:32 | 13 |
| RE .2
I agree with Paul. I have never had trouble taking some weight
off. The problem has alwayse been taking it all off, then keeping
it, and even more, off.
The reasons are obvious, until this time (I hope) I have never modified
my old, bad, habits. Over the last two years I have been working
on that, and in the process have lost the weight. It is the ONLY
reasonable way.
-Joe
|
232.4 | What? | CSC32::G_MCINTOSH | | Thu Feb 25 1988 12:59 | 8 |
| OK, what's going on? I respond to a note and then 2 people AGREE
with me? No way! Someone's playing April Fools on me or something.
Did you all meet outside of this notes file and decide to pull this
on me? No one disagreeing with McIntosh? Unheard of in this notes
file! C'mon.....clue me in!
Glenn
|
232.5 | May still have a copy somewhere... | SHIRE::BIZE | | Fri Feb 26 1988 01:44 | 19 |
| The question in .0 is still valid. If anybody wants to follow a
fad diet, or what looks like one, he/she should be able to ask
information about it.
To go back to the Mayo Clinic Diet:
I may still have it at home, but I think the "unlimited" part is
not as large as you describe, and there are quite a few vegetables
in the diet. I know my Mom followed it for 10 days at a time about
two or three times per year, quite successfully, but she had only
very little weight to lose. Although it's easy to lose weight on
it, the diet is pretty boring, and there is no follow-up on how
to keep the weight off.
I'll look at home over the week-end and post it here if I find it.
Joana
|
232.6 | No more Glenn-bashing! ;-) | SQM::AITEL | Every little breeze.... | Wed Mar 16 1988 12:12 | 18 |
| Hey Glenn, I agree with you too!
I've done a good bit of yo-yo dieting, and those 2-week diets
are the cause. You don't learn anything that you can apply
to your normal diet. You learn to be hungry, and then to eat
wierd combinations of food. You don't learn how to deal with
eating out, or how to cook food for your family that you can
eat too, or how to eat food that will make you full, not fat.
I might not reduce protein as far as Glenn does, but I still
eat a diet that's high carb (especially complex carbs like
grains and potatoes), medium protein, and low fat. And I'm
doing bodybuilding - I'm in the gym at least 5 times per week
for 2 hours � � hour sessions each time. You really don't need
as much protein OR fat as our average american diet contains,
even if you're doing a lot of exercise.
--Louise
|
232.7 | Short term diets aren't for me | RSTS32::KASPER | Ever have one of those lifetimes? | Thu Mar 17 1988 10:51 | 21 |
|
Glenn, I only disagree with you when I think you're wrong :-)! This
isn't one of those times. I forget where I read about it, but there
was some diet doctor who decided to give the next patient who walked in
a bizarre regimen to follow. It was completely off the top of her head
-- 2 tomatoes for breakfast, 6 oz chicken and 10 grapes for lunch --
that sort of thing. The patient lost weight, and was really upset when
the doctor told her that it wasn't a proper diet.
The moral is, if you restrict your intake for 2 weeks, either in
quantity or in number of different foods, you'll lose a few pounds. If
you only need to take off 5, that's probably good enough. Your normal
regimen probably isn't that outrageous, or you'd be heavier. But for
those of us who have serious weight problems, and/or are compulsive
overeaters, this sort of diet is worse than worthless. The inevitable
regain feeds the "I'll never be the weight I want to be" mindset, which
defeats so many diets before they begin.
Beverly
|
232.8 | | CSC32::G_MCINTOSH | | Mon Mar 21 1988 07:18 | 9 |
| I don't know what's going on, but I feel like getting set up for
a good one. Both Louise AND Beverly agreeing with me is truly a
frightening event. But, so be it. I agree that short term diets
aren't the right thing.
Thanks.
Glenn
|
232.9 | I did it ... | XNOGOV::LISA | Give quiche a chance | Fri Jun 26 1992 12:19 | 17 |
| I have just followed this diet for 11 days in order to lose a few
pounds quickly. I lost 7 pounds and have maintained my weight with
careful eating. My doctor gave me the diet sheet.
However, I would not reccommend this diet to anyone. The food is boring
and resulted in me eating 24 eggs in *ONE WEEK*. Too much for anyones
digestive system!! I am glad that I lost the weight, but I felt ill
most of the time and lacked energy.
There must be better ways to lose weight than this!
Lisa.
PS I've just checked my weight in the height/weight chart - according
to that I'm 6 pounds overweight :-( Still, I'm happy, my clothes fit
and I don't look huge ;-) Should I worry?
|
232.10 | Oops, I can't count! | XNOGOV::LISA | Give quiche a chance | Fri Jun 26 1992 12:28 | 6 |
| Just revisited the height/weight chart with calculator in hand - I am
in fact right in the middle of the ideal weight range. :-) Maths was
never my strong point .... I only have a degree in it :-)))))
Lisa.
|