T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
180.1 | Fit for a fight | CSC32::ANDRADE | | Sun Jan 03 1988 13:45 | 24 |
|
I have read the book and have found some of the items to
make alot of sense, and some to be a bit misleading....like
the part about not eating a starch and protein together
(which seemed almost impossible at the start) I was told by
a nutritionist that the intestines are what sucreates the alkaline
and by the time the food gets that far there is very little acid..
therefore no neutralizing..I liked the part about eating fruits
in the morning..it seemed to work as a very good regulator..
Also I thought they had good reasoning as far as the cycles are
concerned..interesting concepts..although they break alot of myths
I grew up with..I still beleive Americans eat twice what they should
and don't seem to take into consideration what our digestive systems
really work best with...fruits. In reality I don't think I could
live on just fruits...I need my daily salads to keep me in line.
i learned alot from the book, and thought it would be good in some
respects and in others..well..did you happen to check their
credentials?
|
180.2 | Still fit for life? | NEWVAX::MELVIN | Pattycakes, pattycakes... | Tue Mar 29 1988 09:53 | 21 |
| Hi Donna,
I have recently started reading the Fit for Life book and I am
very excited. You see a friend of mine has been following the
plan for a year and a half now, and he loves it. He claims to
more energy, feel better (hasn't had a cold seen he started),
and he lost weight (which he really didn't need to but...).
Also my sister just started...she has been on the program for
a little more than 2 weeks now and has lost 15 lbs. I know
this doesn't sound that health...but she looks great, feels
fine, and the big plus she says that never gets hungry or
cranky like she usually does when she diets.
My question to you are:
Are you following the plan? Do you like it? Have you had any
problems, concerns, or recommendation regarding the plan?
I'd love to hear anything!
Patricia Melvin
|
180.3 | I'VE BECOME MORE CONSCIOUS OF WHAT I EAT! | EPOCH::ROGER | | Tue Mar 29 1988 11:50 | 28 |
| Well, initially I followed the FIT for LIFE program. Because I
only need to lose about 5 lbs. I haven't been that faithful to
it. However, I did notice I was down about 3 lbs. when I was following
the program.
What I've found most interesting now, is that I am more conscious
of what I eat always thinking about how the food I've combined
will digest etc. What is most exciting about this program is that
it definitely is not a *DIET*. It is a WAY OF EATING/LIVING. I
think people get defeated as soon as they say I AM ON A DIET. The
first thing you begin doing when you say that nasty 4 letter word
is think of the food you can't eat. The end result, you find yourself
eating exactly what you told yourself not to. At least that is
the way I used to operate. With FIT for LIFE, you don't have to
worry about what you can't eat, rather, you just have to think of
what you want to eat but just become more aware of proper food
combining. If improperly combined, the food will not digest properly,
thus allowing the food more time to "rot" in your stomach......end
result...."fat".
Its a great book, the authors seem very knowledgeable and it is
written in terminology that is understandable and interesting.
I've recommended this book to so many people. It is definitely
worth reading!
Donna
|
180.4 | | KIRIN::SPARROW | CAUTION!! recovering smoker! | Tue Apr 12 1988 09:01 | 6 |
| I have a friend who has been using FIT FOR LIFE, for over 6 months
and has lost 85 lbs. She looks wonderful,and the occasional meal
of no-nos has not affected her weight at all.
Vivian
|
180.5 | Fit for Life is NOT a sound diet | ANGORA::ZARLENGA | Save Ferris | Tue Apr 12 1988 12:14 | 10 |
| I did a report on this diet 2 years ago.
The Fit for Life diet, as it existed in 1986, is not nutritionally
sound. I will look for the report and post the reasons here.
If you are pregnant or have any chronic heatlh problems, make sure
your doctor knows that you're on this diet!
-mike z
|
180.6 | revisited... | JJM::ASBURY | | Wed Aug 03 1988 15:46 | 23 |
| re: .5
Mike - do you have that report handy? I'd be very interested in
seeing it.
Is there anyone else out there who has any experience with or opinions
about this eating plan? I have started reading the book. There are
some concepts that make sense to me and others which just seem way
out in left field. For example, I've always been taught that if
you eat more calories than you burn up, you gain weight. Makes sense
to me! The Diamonds, on the other hand, say that fat is created
by food which has rotted in your stomach. Hmmm...
Also, there has been so much documented evidence of problems resulting
from calcium deficiency, especially for women. Fit for Life recommends
no dairy products at all. Hmmm...
Any other comments?
-Amy.
|
180.7 | | ANT::ZARLENGA | it takes 2 to make it outta sight | Wed Aug 03 1988 16:39 | 14 |
|
.6> Mike - do you have that report handy? I'd be very interested in
.6> seeing it.
No. It was a 'final' and the professor kept it.
I called Fit For Life, "Fit For Laughs" in my report. The
professor agreed. There are so many theories that are presented
that oppose conventional medical and nutritional beliefs that the
first time I read it I had to go back; I thought my notes were
wrong.
-mike z
|
180.8 | refund please.... | CADSE::WILLIAMS | | Wed Aug 03 1988 23:36 | 6 |
| I had bought that book...read one page and took it back...waste
of money...I feel sorry for those people who really don't know that
the information in that book can be very harmful....
Loretta
|
180.9 | Just what I thought... | JJM::ASBURY | | Thu Aug 04 1988 10:28 | 8 |
| re: .7 and .8
Thanks to both of you. I agree, completely. I am reading the book
for curiousity's sake only. A great example of Freedom of Speech,
I think.
-Amy.
|
180.10 | Is it REALLY that bad? | CHDB03::FINKEL | So glad you made it | Tue Feb 14 1989 09:26 | 27 |
| Folks,
I'm no expert and I'm no great fan of 'Fit for Life'. But I don't
think that there is anything DANGEROUS about eating nothing but
fruit before lunch, avoiding mixing protein and starch in the same
meal, eating mainly vegatables (as undercooked as possible) and
starches. Fruit is good for you and it IS easily digested in the
morning. The last thing I want to eat in the morning is oatmeal!
The ban on mixing protein and starch in the same meal MAY be pure
pseudo-science, but I don't think it'll kill you. Eating mainly
raw veggies and lots of carbohydrates (as unprocesses as possible)
is probably a FINE idea (cf. Pritikin). The total prohibition of
dairy products that it advocated in 'Fit for Life' IS probably a
BAD idea, especially for women and ESPECIALLY for pregnant women.
I have been eating according to some of the concepts in this book
and I haven't died yet. It may not be the most profound bit of
dietary science every published, but I think that it is not all
THAT dangerous if you add a little cheese once in a while; besides,
what IS the point of living if you can't eat a little cheese :-)
Actually, of all of the fad diets that I've seen (and I'm not an
expert, just an interested fellow passenger), this one seems to
be among the more inocuous and benign.
/Joel Finkel
|
180.11 | It's interesting | HOTAIR::SIMON | Hugs Welcome Anytime! | Thu Feb 23 1989 19:22 | 45 |
| I too have read FIT FOR LIFE. I also have read most of FIT FOR
LIFE II. I agree with previous comments that there is some good
and some bad. I have been on a million diets in my life and decided
to do what is best for me in the way of changing my eating habits.
I am a big breakfast lover but one of the things I have started
adhering to is eating only fruit before noon. Instead of coffee
in the morning, I have been having hot water with lemon. I do like
coffee and have a cup of that after lunch. For lunch, I usually
have salad bar and allow myself a little pasta or cheese. I try
to watch the food combining but admit that if we have a pasta &
Tuna salad, that I occasionally have that. For dinner, I try to
have vegetables most of the time and occasionally a starch (potatoe
or pasta) and sometimes a meat. I try to adhere to the FIT FOR
LIFE suggestions for food combining but if the mood hits me, I will
have meat and a potatoe.
I have cut way down on milk and cheese. I've been allowing myself
a little bit of low fat milk in my coffee.
Up until this week (3 weeks since starting this) I had lost 13 pounds.
This week, with a period due, I have gained 4 back, but expect those
will come right off.
I find that the book's comments regarding energy seem to be valid.
Eating only fruit in the morning, I find I have a lot more energy
than with a big breakfast (although I found myself staring at the
hash browns and sausage in the cafeteria this morning).
FIT FOR LIFE II does a lot more stressing of a vegetarian diet and
I am not ready to become a vegetarian. I eat very little meat but
what I do eat, I enjoy.
I guess, my comments regarding FIT FOR LIFE are that it should be
taken with a grain of salt (No I don't really mean that - salt is
bad for you) but it is not without some merit. It is an interesting
read but my suggestion would be to read it and look at other plans
and come up with what is best for you. I think at this point, I
am somewhere between a FIT FOR LIFE and a food exchange regimen.
Will it work? who knows... but at least I think I've hit on something
right for me.
Denise Simon
|
180.12 | | ANT::ZARLENGA | laughter is an enema for the soul | Fri Feb 24 1989 14:08 | 11 |
|
.11> adhering to is eating only fruit before noon. Instead of coffee
If you have a problem concentrating with only carbohydrates
for breakfast, add a little protein.
The no-protein breakfast hits me very hard during the morning
when I'm trying to work.
-mike z
|
180.13 | Concentration seems okay | HOTAIR::SIMON | Hugs Welcome Anytime! | Fri Feb 24 1989 14:54 | 7 |
| Actually, I haven't noticed any problem concentrating. With fruit-only
before noon, I definitely have more energy and I think concentration
may be better than it has been with "the sleepies" after a big
breakfast in the past.
Denise
|
180.14 | Fit_For_Life -- Revivals??? | HORSEY::MACKONIS | Forever is as far as I go | Wed Apr 24 1991 17:16 | 30 |
| I have been mostly "read_only" in this file, but like the majority of the noters
in this file I need to loose weight and have tried a zillion diets over the last
20+ years.
A friend gave me this book to read and I thought it was great. I am starting
this change of eating habits today, the day I QUIT smoking. Like amny I am
trying to make myself healthy after years of abusing my body. I know it won't
be easy. I have tried very seriously over the last 2 years to loose weight, and
I either maintain or gain on the diets (for the ones that I maintain, I get
depressed I haven't lost and become a "Refrigerator Maniac". I tried Jenny
Craig for 2 months and gained weight! I tried my own diet last month, gave
it 3 weeks so my body woulnd't fight it so much (600 calories a day) and have
maintained.
I like fruit and veggies, the hardest part will be no coffee til noon...I roll
out of bed and stagger into the kitchen and hit the "on" button on the coffee
pot before my eyes have even opened.
I would like to know if anyone else has tried this diet since '88 - '89 time
frame and what they thought.
As for the previous noter claiming this diet dangerous, I can't see what is
dangerous about fresh fruits, veggies, cut down on red meats, etc. The
problem can come in from eliminating dairy foods, particularly for women who
need their calcium. However, nutritinally, we can obtain calcium from green,
leafy vegetables and raw nuts
I'll keep everyone posted, I plan to loose 42 pounds.
Starting Day #1...........dana
|
180.15 | calcium and dairy products | ESCROW::ROBERTS | | Wed Apr 24 1991 18:39 | 14 |
| re .-1
I heard a report on NPR a few days ago which mentioned dairy products /
need for calcium, etc. Anyway, this spokesman (can't remember the
group he represented) stated that numerous studies have shown that
calcium derived from dairy products has little or no effects on the
amount of calcium available in our bodies. These same studies indicate
that the main reason for lack of calcium is eating too much protien.
Seems digesting too much protein causes calcium to be leached out of
the body. The upshot is that dairy products are not the answer, since
they are high in protein. Less protein seems to be the way to go --
less meat, less cheese, less milk...
-ellie
|
180.16 | | SWAM1::PEDERSON_PA | Hey man, dig this groovy scene! | Wed Apr 24 1991 19:03 | 17 |
| re: 14
Sorry, can't comment on the diet, but you mentioned also
that you're trying to quit smoking, too.
Please give this some consideration..... I've also tried to
diet and quit smoking and all it did was set me up for
failure. One (or some?) of the chemicals in tobacco actually
speeds up your metabolism, so quitting will most likely
slow down your metabolism, make you jumpy, etc. Not exactly
great side effects for a dieter :-)
I wish you luck.....
pat
|
180.17 | | HORSEY::MACKONIS | Forever is as far as I go | Wed Apr 24 1991 22:46 | 12 |
| I know this isn't really a diet topic, but I have tried to quit smoking before
and it hasn't worked. This time I am READY to quit. I also used a 3 week
program called Kick the Habit which uses a filter method. Each week for 3 weeks
you are cutting back on the amount of nicotine you take in -- til at the end of
3 weeks, you are only getting 10% of the nicotine from a cigarette.
Plus, the fit for life isn't really a diet -- it is eating modification,
behaviorial training -- however you want to call it...I am going to get
healthy by eating right and taking the poisons out of my body!!
Wish me luck...
dana\
|
180.18 | Just my thoughts about eating less a. stop smoking | UFHIS::CKOEV | | Thu Apr 25 1991 09:41 | 13 |
|
Just wanted to say that I bought something called
"Search n Stim" (Acupuncture with electric impulse).
You can try to eat less and also stop smoking (there are
more possibilities than these like headache etc.)
I guess it is coming from USA (I am from Germany).
I think it works for me ...
Carina
|
180.19 | Is it BAD for you??? | MIMS::PORTER_P | | Fri Apr 02 1993 22:32 | 20 |
|
Well there doesn't seem to be much FACT proving that this diet is
dangerous.....
.....Is there anyone out there who can substantiate their claims that this
diet is harmful or unhealthy?? I remember a reading a negative
article on this diet in a magazine (Cosmo?) several years back but I
don't recall any facts.
Has anyone suffered any harm from this eating style?
I would really like to hear from anyone who can provide info on this
topic.
THanks,
pauline
|
180.20 | | HDLITE::ZARLENGA | Michael Zarlenga, Alpha P/PEG | Tue Apr 06 1993 22:08 | 8 |
| No fact proving it's anything more than sheer quackery for $$, either.
Will it kill you? Probably not.
It's safer and cheaper to siply eat a balanced, low-fat diet.
This no protein before Xpm, no carbohydrates with y foods, etc. is
hogwash.
|
180.21 | Sitting on the fence... | MIMS::PORTER_P | | Wed Apr 07 1993 20:09 | 40 |
| RE: -1
Hi Mike,
Thanks for replying...I was hoping that someone out there would see my
note...I've a few questions on your reply.
> No fact proving it's anything more than sheer quackery for $$, either.
Your right, no one on either side of the fence has provided any proof to
substantiate their claims. It's still not clear to me how this could be
harmful...
....but there do seem to be an awful lot of people out there who swear by
it and enjoy its benefits (lots of energy and weight-loss).
> Will it kill you? Probably not.
I would really like to know if this is UNHEALTHY in any way...I am concerned
because I know several people who are on it and swear by it. If its
unhealthy for them in any way I'm sure they would like to know. If it's not
unhealthy for them to follow this plan and they are happy with the lifestyle
and happy with the results -- wonderful!
I haven't seen one testimony or account in this conference of someone who
has had disagreeable/undesireable results on this plan...If there is anyone
out there who knows about the harmful side affects, I sure would appreciate
hearing about it.
> It's safer and cheaper to siply eat a balanced, low-fat diet.
> This no protein before Xpm, no carbohydrates with y foods, etc. is
> hogwash.
How is a low-fat diet cheaper? I assume that you mean the cost of the book?
and what makes it safer?
I'm in data-collection mode...any and all facts appreciated!
pauline
|
180.22 | | HDLITE::ZARLENGA | Michael Zarlenga, Alpha P/PEG | Fri Apr 09 1993 19:13 | 17 |
| .21> and what makes it safer?
It's safer because it's based on sound nutritional advice.
If I tell you "don't drink any milk before 6pm and no fruit juice
after 8pm," and "never eat complex carbohydrates with protein at the
same meal," you might lose weight.
That doesn't mean my instructions have any basis in nutrition.
Why is it cheaper? It's cheaper to learn basic nutrition, and apply
it. It'll save you time and money. Sure, you only spent $5 this time
on the book, what anout next time when yu spend $10 a day for Nutri-
System or SlimFast?
I wish I could find my old report on this diet ...
|
180.23 | A man needs meat!! | COMET::RALSTON | Individualists Unite | Fri Jul 01 1994 21:54 | 34 |
| It has been over a year since the last reply to the Fit-For-Life
question but I thought that I would make a comment. About for years ago
I read the fit for life book and it really sounded logical to me. I
decided to give it a try. It seemed to work great, I lost 40 lbs in
about 4 months and kept it off. I even got the other books,
Fit-For-Life II and Marilyn's cookbook. I eventually became a
vegetarian. The problem with the diet was twofold. 1). I was always
hungry. I fought with myself over "to eat or not to eat" the entire
time that I was on the program. 2). The book also recommends a regular
arobics program. Supposedly they ride their bikes 10 miles every
morning. This sound wonderful and was religious in adherence to all
parts of the program. But, as I got more in shape, the less energy I
had. Seems backwards but it dawned on me that I may not be getting
something that I need.
After reevaluating the program I discovered that I had cut down on my
coloric intake by about half. So with the increased activity of running
for 40 minutes each day, who whouldn't lose wait. The fact that I had
less energy helped me to conclude that my nutrition was suffering.
I still run, which I believe is the real reason for my weight being
stable, but I eat everything except I stay away from processed sugar,
caffiene and alchohol. I feel much better now and am in good shape. I
think I really missed meat, especially after I became arobically fit.
I still use many of the suggestions that I enjoy and that work for me.
Fruit in the morning and no eating between the hours of 8:00pm to
4:00am. The second book has good suggestions for keeping skin healthly
which I use and find terrific.
I Think a Man needs meat!!
...tom
|