T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
76.1 | Feeling good is more important! | ARGUS::CORWIN | I don't care if I AM a lemming | Wed Jul 08 1987 12:50 | 28 |
| re .0:
> I have seen the slogan NOTHING TASTES AS GOOD AS BEING THIN
> FEELS many times.
A more correct version of the slogan would probably be: NOTHING TASTES AS
GOOD AS FEELING GOOD ABOUT YOURSELF.
You say that weighing what Weight Watchers or a doctor would consider
"reasonable" for you is not comfortable for you. Have you spoken to your
doctor about that? I wouldn't be surprised if there are lots of people out
there who just don't fit into the "charts". I think it's more important to
be healthy and happy, with a full life, rather than thinner, unhealthy, and
tired. Or maybe there's even another physical cause for your experience.
You're not damaged goods, you may just march to a "different drummer" in this
respect.
I'm sure there are a lot of people who are perfectly happy being 20 pounds
over the chart's ideal weight. You don't hear about them because they're
not trying to lose weight and talking about it like we are here. I hear
people saying "oh, I'm trying to lose weight" all the time. I never hear
people say "oh, I'm at the weight I want to be at so I'm not on a diet"
unless prompted.
Feel good about yourself!
Jill
|
76.2 | | BEING::TEGAN | | Wed Jul 08 1987 13:21 | 20 |
| RE .0:
I can think of two things that may cause you lack of energy at lower
weights.
One thing that I think is essential to feeling energetic is being
energetic. I often feel more tired and listless on a day when I
am just hanging around doing nothing than on a day when I go for
a bike ride, take the dog for a long walk etc... Once in a while
when I get home from work I feel too tired to get any excercise,
but once I force myself to for for that run, I am a new person.
Once in a while I even HAVE to walk or run at lunch because I feel
to tired to do any work.
Another important issue is the types of foods you eat. I know you
said you eat healthy things but what sorts and in what combinations.
Complex Carbohydrates, such as fruit and bread(no butter though)&grains
give lots energy, where as tunafish, although healthy does not provide
the same energy.
|
76.3 | Another View | CHESIR::WOLOCH | Another feisty one | Thu Jul 09 1987 07:11 | 18 |
| Hi Marcia,
There was a column in the latest issue of "Women's Sports and Fitness"
that was similar to your letter. Briefly, it stated that a person's
body has a certain weight "setpoint" that may not be what the
Metropolitain Life Health Insurance Charts categorize. The article
went on to say that YOUR best weight may indeed be plus or minus
20 pounds what the chart says. YOUR ideal weight is the weight that
you feel your best at. When you diet, your body's metabolism adjusts
to a certain weight and even though you may want to lose more, your
body may be telling you, "Hey, Marcia - stop starving me!, your
weight is just fine." The article went on to say all the stuff
we already know about society's unrealistic view of thinness and
the pressures that women feel toward dieting.
Just my two cents,
Nancy
|
76.4 | Energize me!!!! | SQM::AITEL | Helllllllp Mr. Wizard! | Thu Jul 09 1987 09:55 | 21 |
| Regarding setpoints - I have seen but not read a book on setpoints,
and how to modify your setpoint. Has anyone got more info on this?
Does the book deal with energy issues?
Re exercise - I often feel dragged out when I walk into the gym,
force myself to change and get out there, and after about 15 min
I've got my energy back. Sometimes I don't - rarely - and then
I'll do a minimum routine and leave. An aside: Aerobic exercise,
whether dance (which I refuse to do) or biking or walking or
whatever, tends to lower your pulse rate over a few months.
Mine went from 76 ("average" for women) to 58 (good for people who
are "in shape"). This means that my heart doesn't work as hard
just keeping me breathing and walking, and helps me have more energy.
re food - When I started my record-keeping I was amazed to find
that I was shorting myself a LOT on grains. Now that I'm eating
the recommended servings from the 4 food groups I have much more
energy. I'm also taking vitamin/mineral pills, because I know I
don't get enough calcium and iron, and want to be sure on all the
rest.
|
76.5 | I'd be dead if I weighed what they said | CSC32::KACHELMYER | Dave Kachelmyer, VMS/SPACE | Thu Jul 09 1987 10:28 | 16 |
| RE: Weight charts
I was thumbing thru a copy of Nutritional Composition of Foods (or
some such thing) and came upon a weight table in the back (height
vs frame size). I looked myself up and did a double-take, 'cause if
I weighed what the chart said I should, I'm sure I'd be dead! :-)
Maybe it was a chart for one-legged people. ;-)
RE: Pulse rates
I was suprised to note that for an overweight sedentary human,
that my pulse rate seemed to be pretty decent (~60 at rest). Once
I dump the weight and shape up a bit, I wonder what it'll be?
Kak
|
76.6 | ME TOO! | WINERY::ROCH | Leslie Roch | Thu Jul 09 1987 12:29 | 17 |
|
Marcia,
I go through what you described all the time..... I am 5'5" and
weigh 140 lbs. The charts say I should weigh ~125 lbs. If I try
to get down to that weight, as I am now, I am listless, irritable,
and cold. To have the energy to exercise I need eat. My only
consolation has been this.....the other day I was at a customer
site and there was a guy there who was interested in exercising
and such, well we got to talking and he said "what do you weigh,
about 125 lbs or so" and I said "or so....." and he said "well
if you weigh any more than that it's got to be muscle." I thought
to myself....God, it is paying off!!!!! Now what I have to work
on is not thinking about what I weigh but how I look and feel!
-ur not alone---les
|
76.7 | Thanks | NATASH::BUTCHART | | Fri Jul 10 1987 11:39 | 33 |
| Thanks so much for all the replies. My own MD feels pretty good
about me, since my weight is stable and gradually creeping down
(he feels that's much healthier than the yo-yo bit) and all my vital
signs are very good--low cholesterol, low lipid levels, good kidney
function, good EKG, low-normal blood pressure, etc. I'd told him
that the somewhat hysterical tone of the fitness articles I was
reading that swore that the difference between 145 and 125 was going
to kill me with 15 dread diseases next year was making me nervous,
and he said that just as there were those who had to be thinner
than the "norm" to be healthy, there were those who could also go
the other way and be in perfect health too.
Regarding the energizing benefit of exercise:
I have _never_ experienced it.
I'm not talking about feeling tired before working out; I'm dead
within an hour _after_ a workout--unless I eat or sleep. That's why
I work out in the evening; my bosses didn't think too well of my
catatonic stupor during business hours (I'd tried exercising at
lunch and at dawn). The evenings when I exercise I have learned
not to plan to do anything else--I just can't stay awake. Even
though I have worked out fairly faithfully, always reaching for
3 times a week, 45 min to an hour (sometimes more) for 10 years
now, I have yet to _feel_ better for it. My overall ability to
endure has increased, my muscle tissue and tone has increased,
my bodyfat is down, my pulse and blood pressure are nice and low--but
feelings of vitality and energy have never been uplifted. Also,
unlike most people I know, I feel _most_ energetic and active right
after a full meal. Anyone else out there who's had this happen?
Marcia
|
76.8 | Everyone is different, no chart can fit all. | SQM::AITEL | Helllllllp Mr. Wizard! | Fri Jul 10 1987 14:17 | 25 |
| Marcia, my reactions to food and sleep and exercise are about the
reverse of yours! I'm usually a little sleepy after I eat, starting
perhaps a half an hour after, unless I get involved in doing something
during that time. I'm pretty groggy for about half an hour to an
hour after I wake up in the morning, no matter how long or short
the duration of my sleep. I'm WIRED for a few hours after I do
my workout, talking a mile a minute, bouncing off the ceiling
usually. I *do* get tired later on, as well as getting tired if
I do a lot of yard work all day. I tucker out most if I'm in the
hot sun or if it's humid out.
I'm also a complete night-owl and have been since childhood. Perhaps
that has something to do with my reactions vs yours - are you a
morning person?
All I can say about your weight is, if you feel good and like how
you look and you're healthy, it sounds good. You can't go blindly
by the charts. For example, I weigh a touch under 140, and I'm
5'4. You'd think I'd be about a size 12-14, but I'm about an 8,
10 in fitted things. Weight isn't the bottom line, it's size and
bodyfat. I'm shooting for somewhere between 130 and 135 right now,
and I'll see where I feel best. People guess me at 125....
--Louise
|
76.9 | | BEING::TEGAN | | Mon Jul 13 1987 07:00 | 17 |
| re .8:
Louise,
I am a morning person and my reactions are similar to yours.
Exercise makes me very WIRED, I could never eat or sleep for at
least 1 1/2 to 2 hours after. Eating usually makes me tired and
or nauseous, especially if done late in the day. As a matter of
fact, if I do not wait at least 4 hours after eating I can not sleep
because of a stomach ache.
I think these reactions are a result of the lower body fat.
Least I checked, about 3 months ago, my bodyfat was about 14%.
I think it is a little lower now and I have noticed an increase
in most of these reactions. More body fat makes you much more
tired and I also think a little bit hungrier.
|
76.10 | my 100 lines worth! | REGAL::ACKERMAN | | Mon Jul 13 1987 14:06 | 49 |
| Marcia --
From the tone of some of your previous notes, it sounds like you're
happy with your body the way it is now. From this note though,
I get a different impression. I think that all of the
emphasis on being "thin" and having your weight match the weight
on a chart is really outrageous.
I have lost 56 pounds, and I have 25 to go before I hit the top
of the range for my height (according to Weight Watchers).
I have thought about stopping before I hit the top of the range
but have decided to go on.
However, I expect that once I hit the top I'll be ready to stop
loosing. I don't have much faith in those height weight charts.
Individual bodies really vary. As others have pointed out, a fit
body looks like it weighs less. I've discovered that even though
I"m ten pounds lighter than I was several years ago, the pants that
fit me then are just starting to fit now. This is because several
years ago I exercised alot and had a large but toned body. Now
I do not exercise and I have an "untoned" body.
I started out to answer your note, but I seem to have gotten lost
in my own story! I think that anybody who can come to terms with
their body and accept it is doing great. That means you accept
its shortcomings and things that you can't change, and you're happy
with your body when you want to be; not when a height-weight chart
tells you you've hit ideal weight.
It's hard to build a positive self image and even harder when those
around you don't accept you. As I child and teenager I always remember
my doctor telling me how overweight I was and how I should do something
about it. It made me hate doctors! As an adult I have a doctor
who realizes that not everybody's body can be ideal. He suggested
that I loose some weight (about 20 pounds) to see how I felt. He
also told me that I might have to accept the fact that my body was
not a "thin" body.
Oops. I'm really getting carried away here. But one more thing.
I haven't really felt better since I've lost weight. I feel better
psychologically, and some physical symptoms have dissappeared (for
example, my feet don't hurt as much after walking for a long time).
But I don't feel the way I expected I would after loosing so much
weight. It's good to hear that there is somebody else who doesn't
run around yelling about how wonderful it is to be thin. I don't
want to be thin -- just "average", give or take a few pounds.
--Laura
|
76.11 | that exercise effect | CADSE::WILLIAMS | | Tue Jul 14 1987 15:41 | 12 |
| RE: exercise and re-energizing
After work I will be on my way to class with alot of negative self-talk
(I'm tired, do I really want to go to aerobics, etc...) and almost falling
alseep at the wheel (too much traffic) but after class I am up and alert as
if I just awakened. If is has been a very taxing day, then the reverse is
true I just need rest...
Therefore I have experienced the re-energizing effects of exercise, but
not all the time...my body still tells me when I am exhausted....
Loretta
|
76.12 | | NATASH::BUTCHART | | Thu Jul 16 1987 09:07 | 74 |
| re: .10
This raises a series of interesting issues. I _am_ fairly happy
with my body now. My problem seems to lie with wondering if it
is "right" to be happy with it. It seems, after 36 years of living
in it, to have the following characteristics:
o it is resource-dependent. How good and vital and energetic
it feels is very closely tied to amounts of food and sleep
it receives. Exercise, sadly, does not seem to be a resource
for it.
o Endurance is its main talent. It has the ability to keep at
any given endeavor for a good while, and exercise has increased
this. But if it is going to maximize its talent, it can't expend
energy too fast, or burnout occurs. It is not long on speed,
springiness, swiftness--all those things that are prominent in
my competitive sports loving friends.
o It is not naturally svelte. I have photos of the two times I
weighed 125. I look _no different_ than in the photos where
it weighs 150! The shoulders and arms are still hunky, legs
still large, frame still broad. The refinements that 25 pounds
made in my overall shape were quite subtle.
o It _is_ naturally shapely. When I gain weight, it goes on
all over as a slowly increasing layer of padding. Fat does not
glom onto a localized area like the belly, the rear, the
thighs; I feel fortunate in this.
o It is mesomorphic; that is, I do tend to build muscle tissue
easily. Over the slow years of slowly working out, I know
that its composition is different, because when I was a teen-
ager I floated like a cork, even in fresh water. I now sink
like a rock, even in salt water. That tells me that my overall
fat to muscle ratio has improved over time even if it is
higher than supposed optimum.
o Slow is always better for it than fast. Losing one to two
pounds a year it likes (rewards me by staying well). Increasing
workouts extremely gradually it likes (rewards me by staying
uninjured). Walking it likes; running it hates. Belly dancing
it likes; traditional aerobic dancing it hates. Callanetics
it likes; Jane Fonda it hates. Practicing constant, perfect
posture it likes; practicing specific exercises designed to
improve postural muscles only a few times a week it hates.
So overall, it seems to be a nice body, and I like it better as
time goes by. It looked much the same at 16 as it does at 36, but
the body that looked odd on a 16-year old (all of my friends were
anorexic sticks at 16) looks great on a 36-year old. But it is not
truly, completely, _thin_ and is perhpas not meant to be. And
my head's problem is that it gets affected from time to time by
the hysteria I sense from fitness/fashion articles and books that
all but shriek at me "What do mean, not meant to be thin?? You're
just a self-limiting, defeatist, slob!! Get up off your butt and
get going you lazy slut! Don't you realize you'll be dead in 3
years if you keep going as you are???"
Is that how some of the fitness literature sounds to some of you
out there? I wonder if some sense of balance is a good idea,
especially for those of us who are not vastly overweight. For
instance, I am _really impressed_ to read accounts of people who
celebrate the loss of a hundred pounds, and still have a hundred
to go. But I'm starting to think that where neurosis about the
whole thing can set in is when you get close to ideal (within 20
pounds). Then you may wonder "when am I done? For that matter,
what _is_ done? For me, for my body? What should I really be
shooting for? Where is normal? What is beautiful? And who decides?"
Thanks for provoking all the thoughts,
Marcia
|
76.13 | my circular train of thought | REGAL::ACKERMAN | | Thu Jul 16 1987 11:52 | 42 |
| Yes, I agree that when you get down to the last 20 pounds or so
it becomes more difficult in many ways.
When you have lots of weight to loose you know that you are overweight
and have to do something about it. When you get closer to a goal
weight (a weight that you've picked off a chart or been given by
a doctor) you might start to think about that weight, and wonder
if that's where you really need to be.
In my case that thought comes from a few things. First off, I'm
getting tired of dieting and so maybe I could just stay a little
fat. Second, and even more so, when I get to that goal weight will
it be a constant struggle to maintain it? (I think it will be).
In my case I've decided that if I don't go all the way to my goal
weight I'll be disappointed in myself. It's not that I'm being
too hard on myself. I forgive myself for slips, errors, setbacks.
I have to because if I really want to modify my lifestyle I"m going
to have to think about this stuff for the rest of my life. And
I cannot spend the rest of my life berating myself because I decided
to eat a big meal or a good piece of cake.
For me, being at my goal weight will be an all time low weight and
a minor miracle for me. For other people of my build and height
my goal weight might be an all time high weight for them.
It's interesting how as you get closer to being thin you begin thinking
about if you could ever look like someone you admire (Jane Fonda,
for example). It's hard to explain but I'll try. When you are
very overweight, you usually have a very low opinion of yourself.
You think, "Oh, I'll never look like those thin women with great
bodies." As you loose weight you might think, "Hey, I'm going to
be thin and look great and all my problems will be over." And then
you might begin to realize that you are not going to look like a
model and that your body might not be perfect. So you kind of go
full circle, and you have to learn to accept your body for what
it is.
As usual I've gotten caught up in myself without really answering
the previous replies. I hope this made sense to someone!
--Laura
|
76.14 | I'd love to derail this one ;-) | NATASH::BUTCHART | | Thu Jul 16 1987 12:40 | 27 |
| In my case what happened was just as I was really beginning to feel
pleased with the progress I was able to make, I had begun reading
fitness literature in order to get more idease for doing better in
the exercise department. And I started to get defensive and resentful
over the tone of most of that literature! But the various authors
are so insistent and I'm still so sensitive to that particular
hellfire-and-brimstone slant (which used to be chiefly the province
of Beauty Literature) that my hackles get raised. But these authors
are claiming that it's okay for them to sound like this becuase
they are working for Optimum Health, not Mere Beauty. And so I
doubt myself. And feel angry for doubting myself because self-doubt
causes me to backslide and treat myself badly. And I feel angry
that the literature I am reading implies that I am damaged goods.
But I feel like damaged goods anyway, especially when so many others
find they can follow and believe the literature and find that it's
all true for them.
What I struggle to do instead is act like I'm proud, like I believe
in myself (behavioral affirmations, in a way), trying to counter
the doubt and hoping that one day the tone of things I read won't
affect me as strongly as it does today.
And I try hard to be very kind to my dieting friends. To me they
are heroes.
Marcia
|