T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
446.1 | truck, sedan and SPORTSCAR | STKAI1::FEHRM | Bjorn Fehrm @ugo | Wed Oct 25 1995 19:29 | 3 |
446.2 | A different interpretation | GEMGRP::PIEPER | | Thu Oct 26 1995 08:26 | 82 |
446.3 | Since when is peak MIPS equal to SPECint92 ? | KAMPUS::NEIDECKER | GLASS: Services on Demand | Thu Nov 02 1995 09:53 | 6 |
446.4 | MIPS != SPECint92, but that wasn't the point | GEMGRP::PIEPER | | Thu Nov 02 1995 11:12 | 16 |
446.5 | | ATLANT::SCHMIDT | See http://atlant2.zko.dec.com/ | Thu Nov 02 1995 14:51 | 10 |
446.6 | Processor, cache[cache][cache], memory, COMPILERS | PERFOM::LICEA_KANE | when it's comin' from the left | Thu Nov 02 1995 16:20 | 24 |
446.7 | removing main memory from the equation | DECC::OUELLETTE | Roland G. Ouellette | Thu Nov 02 1995 16:25 | 10 |
446.8 | | PCBUOA::KRATZ | | Thu Nov 02 1995 16:58 | 15 |
446.9 | | HELIX::SONTAKKE | | Thu Nov 02 1995 18:50 | 7 |
446.10 | | SMURF::MENNER | i'm gonna plant a weeEEping willow... | Fri Nov 03 1995 06:48 | 9 |
446.11 | | SUBPAC::MAGGARD | Mail Ordered Husband | Fri Nov 03 1995 08:00 | 26 |
446.12 | 64MB cache isn't so far-fetched | WRKSYS::SCHUMANN | Resist reality | Fri Nov 03 1995 11:16 | 9 |
446.13 | Apples to Apples and Oranges to Lemons.... | PERFOM::LICEA_KANE | when it's comin' from the left | Fri Nov 03 1995 13:45 | 27 |
446.14 | P Pro doesn't ship in real life! | STKAI1::FEHRM | Bjorn Fehrm @ugo | Fri Nov 03 1995 18:07 | 71 |
446.15 | | AOSF1::kras | Cyber-Shredder | Mon Nov 20 1995 15:28 | 16 |
446.16 | | LANDO::EIBEN | | Tue Nov 21 1995 11:03 | 12 |
446.17 | Intel renames P7, delays shipment untll late '98 | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Tue Jan 23 1996 14:43 | 30 |
446.18 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Tue Jan 23 1996 14:45 | 4 |
446.19 | CISC? no. VLIW? no. RISC? maybe. | SUBPAC::MAGGARD | Mail Ordered Husband | Tue Jan 23 1996 15:30 | 7 |
446.20 | | MOVIES::WIDDOWSON | Brought to you from an F64 disk | Wed Jan 24 1996 09:58 | 5 |
446.21 | Merced in 1999 | GEMEVN::GROVE | | Fri Feb 21 1997 08:05 | 29 |
|
<<< HUMANE::DISK$SCSI:[NOTES$LIBRARY]DIGITAL.NOTE;1 >>>
-< The Digital way of working >-
================================================================================
Note 3157.66 HP/Intel 64bit strategic announcement 66 of 66
SMURF::STRANGE "Steve Strange, UNIX Filesystems" 20 lines 20-FEB-1997 18:36
-< Merced in '99? I hope the 64-bit NT comment is wrong... >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From PC Week -- the latest guess as to when this thing might possibly
ship... That'll mean at least five years from announcement to
first ship.
Intel's 64-bit 'Merced' chip won't ship until 1999 By Lisa DiCarlo and
Rob O'Regan
SANTA CLARA, Calif.--Intel Corp.'s first 64-bit processor, code-named
Merced, is now scheduled to hit the market sometime in 1999. Contrary
to widely published reports that late 1998 was the target date for the
processor, Intel spokeswoman Marion Koehler said the company has never
publicly committed to a time frame except to say the chip would be
released by the year 2000. The shift means that Microsoft Corp.'s
64-bit version of Windows NT won't appear until 1999. Microsoft and
Intel executives said at last September's NetWorld+Interop show that
they would synchronize the release of their respective 64-bit
products. Merced is a high-end server processor with both CISC and
RISC properties. Intel worked with Hewlett-Packard Co. on the initial
design; however, Intel will be responsible for manufacturing,
marketing and licensing.
|
446.22 | | ATLANT::SCHMIDT | See http://atlant2.zko.dec.com/ | Sun Feb 23 1997 11:05 | 12 |
| > The shift means that Microsoft Corp.'s 64-bit version of Windows
> NT won't appear until 1999. Microsoft and Intel executives said
> at last September's NetWorld+Interop show that they would synchro-
> nize the release of their respective 64-bit products.
The Digital/Microsoft partnership certainly is paying big
benefits to Digital, isn't it?
Atlant
P.S.: Yes, your sarcasm detector *SHOULD* be going off.
|