[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference repair::reserve_forces

Title:
Created:Wed Nov 15 1989
Last Modified:Thu Jan 01 1970
Number of topics:0
Total number of notes:0

64.0. "Split MP into Garrison/Combat" by CHIRPA::DENNING () Fri Jan 12 1990 14:00

    With all the news lately about women in combat. I wonder if it is not
    time to revisit the idea of reclassifing Military Police into two
    distinct MOSs.
    
    Back about 6 years ago there was talk about spilting the 95B (Military
    Police) MOS into two different MOSs. 95A - Garrison Military Police and
    95B - Combat Military Policeman. The current role of the combat MP
    Company's is mostly Infantry with a jeep. The new 95B would be
    classified as Combat Arms thus not allowing women soldiers to hold this
    MOS.
    
    Ideas?
    
    Don
    
    
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
64.1These cats have claws!AKOV12::LORENTZENFri Jan 12 1990 16:3514
    There is so much precedent in the US military and government for not
    allowing women to hold combat MOS's it's hard to imagine that it will
    change in the near future.  However, I would prefer to see the various
    roles in any organization opened up to whomever has the ability and
    desire to fill them.
    
    There was an article and pictures in our local New Hampshire newspaper
    which discussed the role played by women in the fighting in Panama. 
    This ranged from the successful MP attack led by a woman commander to
    the hit scored on an enemy soldier at 200 yards by a woman MP with her
    M16.  Women want and deserve equal opportunity.  Why shouldn't they
    have it?
    
    Len  
64.2Go ahead - Make Her DayDOCSRV::STARINMy other ham shack is a GooneybirdFri Jan 12 1990 16:517
    Re .1:
    
    She was described as an "average" marksman in the article. Doesn't
    sound too "average" too me, eh Dusty?
    
    Mark
    RMC USNR
64.3200 yards is averageCHIRPA::DENNINGFri Jan 12 1990 18:447
    If anyone can't hit an enemy soldier at 200 yards I would be worried.
    200 yards is about the average distance on the record fire range. Now
    if they said 350 - 400 yards I would be impressed. The 150-250 range is
    the easiest range to hit the target in because the weapon is zeroed at
    250 yards.
    
    Don
64.4Fighting range 100-300 ydsKAOO01::LAPLANTEFri Jan 12 1990 20:507
    
    I would hope any combat arms person could hit a man at 200 yds.
    
    Min grouping required at 200 yds is 10 in.  That is so you can still
    hit something moving, dodging, etc.
    
    Roger
64.5CHIRPA::DENNINGFri Jan 12 1990 20:553
    Min grouping at 200yds?? Explain please.. Is that fixed target??
    
    Don
64.6Combat shooting might be a little differentDOCSRV::STARINComing in on an 813 and a prayerFri Jan 12 1990 21:4017
    Not to get picky and not that I've fired any rounds in anger
    but....isn't shooting on a range a little different than shooting
    in combat?
    
    Like, for example, how much light was there, was the target moving
    and the person shooting moving to compensate, were there any
    distractions (like returned fire)?
    
    I'm not saying 200 meters is tough but firing from the foxhole position
    at any typical US Army range and shooting at somebody who's maybe
    shooting at you (all the while you're scared sh*tless) may be two
    different things.
    
    FWIW,
    
    Mark
    RMC USNR
64.7Dead is deadAKOV12::LORENTZENFri Jan 12 1990 22:1710
    re .6:
    
    I agree, there's a big difference between shooting on the range at
    paper targets and firing on people in combat.
    
    But my main point, which should be obvious, is that the hittee could
    not care less about the gender of the hitter.
    
    Len
    
64.8Lessons learned on rangesKAOO01::LAPLANTEMon Jan 15 1990 12:5521
    
    I concur that there is a big difference between shooting on the
    range and at moving targets who are shooting back.
    
    However the lessons learned on the range have a direct influence
    on how you are going to do in combat. 
    
    Combat arms personnel in Canada must be able to place five shots
    within a six inch diameter circle at 200 yds before continuing with
    classification shooting. This is done from either the prone position
    or from a fire trench. 
    
    The idea is that if you can get that size grouping in practice
    conditions, it will allow you a much better chance of hitting a
    man sized target in combat. You don't have to see all the target
    just some of it.
    
    So my belief that it is no great deal to hit a man sized target
    at 200 yds.
    
    Roger
64.9Record FireCHIRPA::DENNINGTue Jan 16 1990 14:2619
    Record qualification for the US Army does not use fixed length paper
    targets. The soldier fires on an automatic pop-up target range with
    target ranges from 50 to 300 yards. They are in varing terrain with
    different levels of vegitation.
    
    Some reserve units use what they call the "Reserve Components D Course"
    for record fire. This is a fixed target scalded size paper target. This
    does not qualify as "RECORD FIRE".
    
    Students at the Infantry Center must fire on a moving target range
    where the targets move up/down, left/right, and forwared and back.
    
    If the soldier learns to fire correctly under training conditions they
    should be able to fire under combat conditions. If they grasp what they
    have be tought it should be as automatic as driving a car. When you are
    in a car and a dangerous situation, an impended accident for instance,
    occurs do you freeze?? I don't my body just reacts with the situation.
    
    Don