T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
21.1 | Same Problems in the US | AKOV12::LORENTZEN | | Mon Nov 27 1989 15:26 | 13 |
| Boots seem to be a universal problem. Here in the US the Army seems to
change boot styles every couple of years but, somehow, never get it
right. There is apparent recognition of the problem as evidenced by a
bit of acceptance of the purchasing and wearing of non-issue boots so
long as they conform to the same basic shape and color of those issued.
There are excellent boots which can be purchased and worn but at very
high cost (US$150-200).
I bought a pair of the old style Corcoran jump boots at the exchange
but they're not the answer. Very heavy, cold and leak water around the
soles. Has anyone found a reasonably priced alternative?
Len
|
21.2 | ?????????? | PEKING::SERJEANTS | Better Dead than Red.. | Mon Nov 27 1989 16:33 | 4 |
|
Dave, forgive my ignorance but what the hell is the Danner Boot?
Steve..
|
21.3 | Ft Lewis boot | WEDOIT::QUIGLEY | Nation of sheep is nice for wolves | Mon Nov 27 1989 17:54 | 12 |
|
Danner is the company name, PO Box 22204, Portland Oregon 97222.
I have a pair of the Ft Lewis Boots by Danner. Their tall at 10",
weigh 5lbs 10ozs, are insulated with Thinsulate, have a Gortex outer
shell, steel shank and Vibram sole. They are extremely comfortable
and great up to about 70 degrees F. They also can be purchased without
the insulation.
I got them at the military clothing store for $90, which was a steep
price but they feel like your walking around with slippers. Definitely
worth the price!
|
21.4 | | PEKING::NASHD | | Tue Nov 28 1989 07:12 | 12 |
| Lets see $90 is roughly equivalent to 60 pounds. The prices I've
seen are around 130 pounds, nearer $200.
Maybe there's a niche in the market!
Another alternative company is Lundhags. The sales blurb states
that the Royal Marines wore them while strolling around the Falklands
in 1982. Anyone have any first hand(foot!) experience of them.
Dave
PS:A few of my pinkies are still numb.
|
21.5 | approved but not issued | MPGS::MCCLURE | Why Me??? | Tue Nov 28 1989 13:07 | 15 |
| re .3
These sound like the boots that my CO purchased at clothing sales.
$85-90 seems about right. These boots are approved by the USArmy,
but are not general issue. That is why you can buy them at clothing
and sales, along with Corcoran 'Jump Boots' and Chippewa 'Mountain
Boots'. The 'Danner' boots (I didn't know the brand) have caused this
old First Shirt some difficulty. I get some folks into my unit from
the 10th SFG at Ft Devens. They tried to tell me that you weren't
supposed to polish those boots. I told them that they either polished
them, or didn't wear them in garrison! After that drill, I checked
out the situation and announced at the next meeting that the PX did
indeed have an ample stock of the Silicon based that was approved for
those boots. That goes for the Chippewas too. No problems now 8-).
|
21.6 | Unless I buy them myself, I'm 10yrs behind issue | MPGS::MCCLURE | Why Me??? | Tue Nov 28 1989 13:18 | 10 |
| Oh yeah, besides the missing word in the next to last sentence of
.5, I forgot to mention that the USArmy has approved a new 'Jungle
boot' and should start issueing them to appropriate units this
year. That means that they will become available in the clothing
sales stores. These boots are almost identical to the 'Nam era
jungle boot, except that the entire boot is black. I think there
are some other, minor, changes, but at least they won't stand out
like a sore thumb in a massed formation of troops. Approval for
wear of the 'Nam era boot will phase out, but you might be able
to dye the fabric.
|
21.7 | $$$$$$$$ | IMBIBE::SCHWARTZR | | Thu Dec 14 1989 17:55 | 10 |
| re the boots sold at the clothing sales
Our clothing sales store had/has two "good???" boots that look alike.
One is the "DANNER BOOT"(going for > $130.00) and the other is a copy
called "THE MATAHORN (sp)" (going for ? <130.00). The only visual
difference seems to be in width.
I would also like to here more about these boots, before I buy 'em.
Randy Schwartz
|
21.8 | correction .7 | KYOA::SCHWARTZR | | Sun Dec 17 1989 17:59 | 5 |
| re.7
stopped by the PX this weekend. Those are "Matterhorn Boots",
and are going for $98.00. Still haven't bought a pair yet.
Randy
|
21.9 | LUNDHAGS | UBOHUB::RUSSELL_F | | Wed Feb 14 1990 14:43 | 29 |
| REF .4 LUNDHAGS
The LUNDHAG boots you mention are very good boots, however, the
types sold in the shops for general release to the public, are
different to the type used in the Marines.
Firstly, yes the boots were used and tested extensively during the
Falklands, but it was found that the boots, while keeping your feet
dry from the rain, left your feet wet with sweat. This is the type
on sale to the public.
We have now tested the boot thouroughly, in all aspects of field
craft, and in all types of conditions. This includes Arctic Warfare.
To this end, most Marines have Lundhags on their arctic kit lists.
There are two types of Lundhags. the first is the type used for
Blackshod conditions, This is very duriable and lets your feet breath
slightly during heavy use.
The second is an arctic version. This type is insulated and completely
water\snow proof. It also has the sole molded for skiis.
If you need more info just ask
Cheers
Frank
|
21.10 | last minute suggestions? | KYOA::SCHWARTZR | | Thu Feb 22 1990 18:32 | 16 |
| annual training and air assault school (maybe) are just around the
corner. I plan on buying either the matterhorn (gore-tex) ($134.00 at
the "CAVALRY STORE") or the Ft Lewis "Go Devils" boot (thinsulate)
(again "CAV STORE price $199.00). Anyone have any last minute
suggestions?
Randy Schwartz
btw for those not familiar with the U.S. Cavalry Store here's info.
phone # 1-800-626-6171
or
US Cavalry
2855 Centennial Avenue
Radcliff, Kentucky 40160-9000
(advertises that they ship worldwide)
|