T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
268.1 | Keep it in Foxboro... | PCBUOA::WALLS | | Thu Mar 27 1997 09:49 | 20 |
|
In my opinion this is too close to the New York base to consider moving
there. Hartford is having trouble supporting a hockey team being the
city's sole pro sport, never mind a football team. And Hartford is far
enough away from alot of New England to discourage some people from
going.
If anyone in Conneticut has a chance it would be the Foxwoods resort,
probably because they would build the whole stadium off of casino
money, hoping people who were going to go to the game would do some
gambling too after the game. They also have the land to do it.
But personally of all the proposed sites I hope they stay in Foxboro
and build a new stadium next to the old one. I still love the fact its
away from the city and its a good atmosphere.
Sean
At least try and keep the location somewhat central.
|
268.2 | let's talk "central" | PATE::NEFF | just doin' the Mad Ticker... | Thu Mar 27 1997 14:02 | 10 |
| > At least try and keep the location somewhat central.
I agree, that would mean they should move north of Boston. Haverhill
and Tewksbury are both trying to bid for the Pats. These locations
would be more central to all of "New England" than their current location.
_sbn
|
268.3 | 3c's, not 2 | SHRCTR::YOUNG | | Thu Mar 27 1997 14:21 | 5 |
| Hmmmmm ...... with the Whalers taking a hike, the State of CT may be
overly aggressive in trying to lure the Patsies.
|
268.4 | But Kraft will probably be able to choose... | PCBUOA::WALLS | | Thu Mar 27 1997 15:24 | 19 |
|
RE .3
Regardless, in the end it will be Kraft's decision and I doubt he would
pick Hartford for many reasons. There are too many "better" picks than
Hartford, where Hartford has the same problems every other pick has
(like tring to convince the people and businesses to foot the bill).
Although the Foxwoods resort, although not central, would be very
enticing for Kraft. He would'nt have to deal with any politics as
the tribe (I forget which one) owns the land in the miidle of the woods
and the tribe would probably not only foot the bill for the stadium
but give Kraft part of the concessions too. The Foxwoods resort gets
about 60,000 potential customers.
They could also use the stadium for concerts...
Sean
|
268.5 | The real question, Who will finance the stadium?? | NETCAD::NPARE | | Fri Mar 28 1997 09:00 | 37 |
|
re- last few.
It definitely would be nice to keep it central to the New England
states or keep it in Foxboro, but since he lost his bid for the Southie,
Kraft specified three requirements to be in place to win the Stadium.
#1- Ample land to build the stadium.
#2- Ample land for parking.
#3- $150 Million in Financing (actually should be #1).
The last requirement scratches Mass. because every Politicos have
stated no public financing for sport/private enterprise. Rhode Island,
and Connecticut are thinking about it, but wondering how much the public
will tolerate paying for........
Foxwood/Tribe (as -1 stated) would be more likely to pay for a Dome/
new stadium because of the potential customers it would attract to their
casino. Talibue(sp?), in the past, promised a SuperBowl in New England
if their is a new stadium built (especially if domed), which would attract
deep pocket customers.......
One problem/issue, the NFL reputation, and gambling..... How would the
public respond to the Stadium/NFL team placed next to a Casino???????
Everyone is very sensitive to the idea of game fixing (I'm not saying that
it happens, but sometimes I get the feeling when a team is driving down the
field at the end of the game and stops short on the score that would beat
the line)........
And let's not forget Cleveland who would pay a King's ransom for
a crack at another NFL team, and to kick the Raven's butt.........
Norm
|
268.6 | Reputation? Please, nowadays its anything goes... | PCBUOA::WALLS | | Fri Mar 28 1997 10:48 | 21 |
|
> One problem/issue, the NFL reputation, and gambling..... How would the
> public respond to the Stadium/NFL team placed next to a Casino???????
> Everyone is very sensitive to the idea of game fixing (I'm not saying
> that it happens, but sometimes I get the feeling when a team is driving
> down the field at the end of the game and stops short on the score
> that would beat the line)........
Tagliabue has already stated that this would not be a problem, that
they could build next to Foxwoods.
As far as financing its funny how the Fleet Center got its name because
although Fleet Bank financed much of it, a good majority of the financing
was from public funds.
So if they financed the Fleet Center with public funds why not help out
Kraft too.
Sean
|
268.7 | | RTL::ROSE | Steve Rose | Fri Mar 28 1997 10:59 | 8 |
| RE *.5
>>... Talibue(sp?), in the past, promised a SuperBowl in New England
>> if their is a new stadium built (especially if domed), which would attract
>> deep pocket customers.......
Unless the new stadium is domed (which I, personally, would not like), New
England has a zero chance of hosting the Superbowl.
|
268.8 | | WONDER::REILLY | Sean Reilly, Alpha Servers, DTN 223-4375 | Mon Apr 07 1997 13:29 | 6 |
|
and even if they build a dome, they'll only get the obligatory "1"
Super Bowl.
Nobody wants to party in a cold city, regardless of how warm the game
is.
|
268.9 | | ICS::CROUCH | Subterranean Dharma Bum | Wed Apr 09 1997 09:27 | 6 |
| The Super Bowl should have a permanent home in New Orleans.
Great City all around and they really know how to put on
big events like this.
Jim C.
|