T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
259.1 | Same old Globe | CSLALL::BRULE | Smack the Pack | Mon Jan 20 1997 13:24 | 10 |
259.2 | McDonough's Sources aren't infallible | GLRMAI::WILKES | | Mon Jan 20 1997 13:39 | 5 |
259.3 | The main issue is the timing... | PCBUOA::WALLS | | Mon Jan 20 1997 14:26 | 15 |
259.4 | Why indict Kraft before the game.....why? | NETCAD::BATTERSBY | | Mon Jan 20 1997 17:11 | 14 |
259.5 | | WONDER::REILLY | Sean Reilly, Alpha Servers, DTN 223-4375 | Mon Jan 20 1997 19:06 | 16 |
259.6 | | MSE1::PCOTE | The plethora dilemma | Tue Jan 21 1997 08:31 | 16 |
259.7 | No Globe today and forever! | WRKSYS::DEROSA | Jambalaya! | Tue Jan 21 1997 08:39 | 13 |
259.8 | Things never seems to change around New England... | NETCAD::NPARE | | Tue Jan 21 1997 08:45 | 19 |
259.9 | Sad | SCAMP::FORTIN_C | New England Patriots, AFC Champs! | Tue Jan 21 1997 09:05 | 23 |
259.10 | Then why is the media rehashing old info??? | PCBUOA::WALLS | | Tue Jan 21 1997 09:41 | 43 |
259.11 | Globe comments | WRKSYS::DEROSA | Jambalaya! | Tue Jan 21 1997 09:45 | 9 |
259.12 | maybe theres a method to the madness | ALASKA::LAFOSSE | WHEN THE BULLET HITS THE BONE... | Tue Jan 21 1997 10:31 | 10 |
259.13 | Shooting the messenger is right... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Tue Jan 21 1997 10:43 | 20 |
259.14 | I blame Parcells | RTL::ROSE | Steve Rose | Tue Jan 21 1997 11:19 | 9 |
259.15 | Let him go if we get #1 pick | CSCMA::BALICH | | Tue Jan 21 1997 11:36 | 40 |
259.16 | Yes, people do have the right to speculate.... | PCBUOA::WALLS | | Tue Jan 21 1997 11:38 | 18 |
259.17 | RE: Let him go if we get #1 pick | RTL::ROSE | Steve Rose | Tue Jan 21 1997 12:44 | 14 |
259.18 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Tue Jan 21 1997 13:31 | 10 |
259.19 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | | Tue Jan 21 1997 13:53 | 19 |
259.20 | Bill and Bob show debuts | LUDWIG::JOHNSTON | | Tue Jan 21 1997 23:50 | 5 |
259.21 | enjoy the moment... | SALEM::LEVESQUE_T | Oh, yeah! The boy can PLAY! | Wed Jan 22 1997 07:07 | 25 |
259.22 | | ABACUS::FORTIN_C | New England Patriots, AFC Champs! | Wed Jan 22 1997 08:06 | 15 |
259.23 | I beleive it will be a positive thing... | PCBUOA::WALLS | | Wed Jan 22 1997 09:19 | 25 |
259.24 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Wed Jan 22 1997 09:31 | 10 |
259.25 | No bad news | WRKSYS::DEROSA | Jambalaya! | Wed Jan 22 1997 10:24 | 12 |
259.26 | No News | RTL::ROSE | Steve Rose | Wed Jan 22 1997 12:44 | 3 |
259.27 | I got a bad feeling.... | WRKSYS::DEROSA | Jambalaya! | Wed Jan 22 1997 12:54 | 14 |
259.28 | | WONDER::REILLY | Sean Reilly, Alpha Servers, DTN 223-4375 | Wed Jan 22 1997 13:15 | 22 |
259.29 | | RTL::ROSE | Steve Rose | Wed Jan 22 1997 13:41 | 5 |
259.30 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Wed Jan 22 1997 13:48 | 9 |
259.31 | So instead of giving up a little control, we should throw the whole team away | PCBUOA::WALLS | | Wed Jan 22 1997 14:03 | 44 |
259.32 | | WONDER::REILLY | Sean Reilly, Alpha Servers, DTN 223-4375 | Wed Jan 22 1997 16:31 | 29 |
259.33 | News clip about today's news conference... | PCBUOA::WALLS | | Wed Jan 22 1997 16:36 | 22 |
259.34 | | CSLALL::BRULE | Smack the Pack | Thu Jan 23 1997 08:31 | 12 |
259.35 | My .02 worths..... | NETCAD::NPARE | | Thu Jan 23 1997 12:41 | 37 |
259.36 | NOONE IS IRREPLACABLE | CSLALL::BRULE | Smack the Pack | Thu Jan 23 1997 12:54 | 10 |
259.37 | It does'nt always happen that way... | PCBUOA::WALLS | | Thu Jan 23 1997 15:53 | 29 |
259.38 | | WONDER::REILLY | Sean Reilly, Alpha Servers, DTN 223-4375 | Fri Jan 24 1997 08:53 | 9 |
|
We can't berate the media for wanton speculation and then engage
in our own. How does one know Kraft is "letting him go?" Or
that Bill really wants to stay here rather than go home?
Nobody's said much of anything, yet I already see Kraft being
painted as the bad guy in all of this...
- Sean
|
259.39 | The situation is almost humorous.... | PCBUOA::WALLS | | Fri Jan 24 1997 09:54 | 44 |
|
> Nobody's said much of anything, yet I already see Kraft being
> painted as the bad guy in all of this...
I would'nt say Kraft is a bad guy at all. Just the fact he is trying
to keep the team in New England and put out a quality product to the
best of his ability means he is a good guy. He has also stated he
wants to keep Parcells but probably not giving him total control.
Now on the other hand Parcells joined this team under a certain
condition, that being he would have total control. Now when ownership
changed hands I did'nt hear anything about Parcells contract changing
status. So Kraft kind of changed the rules on him. Now he is the owner
and thats his perrogative but at the same time Parcells does'nt have to
work under those conditions if he does'nt want to. In fact if it had
been in the contract Parcells could probably have walked out legeally
before the year even started.
So its a sticky situation that developed upon the team changing hands.
So I don't think either guy is the bad guy but Parcells did come here
on the premise he'd have total control and Kraft took it away, so Kraft
will have to live with the decision for better or worse.
So the question is whats whats better or worse:
Parcells with total control or no Parcells and partial management control.
We've debated this to no end and only time will tell what was better.
But one thing for sure, someone (Parcells or Kraft) is going to have to
bend if Parcells is going to stay.
And as far as the media goes, the circus just continues. Now the media
is saying that Pete Carroll, the 49er offensive coordinator, has a
meeting with Kraft after the Super Bowl. Kraft was on the news last
night and said he has'nt even talked to Carroll never mind set up a
meeting, and has not talked to anybody else.
Kraft has stated his position, and that is he wants to keep Parcells
as his coach, but under what conditions may depend on whether he stays
or goes.
Sean
|
259.40 | | WONDER::REILLY | Sean Reilly, Alpha Servers, DTN 223-4375 | Fri Jan 24 1997 10:16 | 9 |
|
> Parcells with total control or no Parcells and partial management control.
Sometimes this gets twisted, though. A lot of people think owners
shouldn't control the running of the team. But remember Kraft isn't
taking away powers from Bill and giving them to himself, he's giving
them to others whove proven they are good at that job.
- Sean
|
259.41 | Past humerous | RTL::ROSE | Steve Rose | Fri Jan 24 1997 10:25 | 17 |
| RE: *.39
>> And as far as the media goes, the circus just continues. Now the media
>> is saying that Pete Carroll, the 49er offensive coordinator, has a
>> meeting with Kraft after the Super Bowl. Kraft was on the news last
>> night and said he has'nt even talked to Carroll never mind set up a
>> meeting, and has not talked to anybody else.
Last night, I actually heard someone from one of the media groups on WEII
claim that Carroll had already agreed to a contract with NE, and that Kraft
would announce that fact on Monday. Yesterday, the Globe was giving the job
to Sherman Lewis (?? or something like that) who is Green Bay's offensive
coordinator.
IMHO, I don't think there will be any anouncement from either Parcells or
Kraft until a couple of weeks after the Super Bowl. Neither would want to
give the impression that they have been bargaining in good faith.
|
259.42 | I'd rather be dead than wear cheese on my head. | PCBUOA::WALLS | | Fri Jan 24 1997 10:39 | 25 |
|
> But remember Kraft isn' taking away powers from Bill and giving them
> to himself, he's giving them to others whove proven they are good at
> that job.
Although the scouting team does most of the groundwork I'll bet
Parcells has had the last say on 95% of the players picked. He's the
coach with the team philosphy and is more in touch with what the team
needs to be successful than the scouts.
The scouts job is out there evaluating players, many times they don't
even have time to watch the games. It's a year round job.
Now If your talking about Grier himself making the decision, then I'd
still disagree. Granted it was easy for him to pitch for Terry Glenn
because he was rated much higher on the value scale, but I think we
needed much more help on defense than offense after last year. Simeon
Rice isn't doing too bad this year himself, is either Tony Brackens.
I'd like to see Grier's pick this year, considering we are at the
bottom of the barrel. Or even in the lower rounds for that matter. Why
was'nt Grier arguing about any of the players in the lower rounds?
Sean
|
259.43 | Success breeds success | LUDWIG::JOHNSTON | | Fri Jan 24 1997 20:57 | 9 |
| I believe Grier is the guy that scooped Otis Smith (one of the great
mid season picks) and Parcells made the other one on Byars (after
checking with his OSU guys about his character and team karma).
Smith can play man with the best of them and with Ty on the other side
watch for great safety play in the SB.
Kraft has an very good personnel team and Grier seems to be an
excellent judge of horseflesh. Just gives us QUALITY coach who is
willing to saddle up for the long ride.
|
259.44 | Parcells Post Game Plans | DONVAN::SCOPA | | Mon Jan 27 1997 09:46 | 7 |
| Did anyone have a problem with the fact that Parcells did not fly back
to New England with the team? I would think that a coach (albeit a lame
duck coach) would want to fly back with his team win or lose.
I wonder how the players felt about this.
Maj
|
259.45 | Not a big deal really..... | WRKSYS::DEROSA | Jambalaya! | Mon Jan 27 1997 12:25 | 11 |
| I wouldn't read too much into this. He had family memebers at the
SB and went home with them. In fact alot of players went home with
their family memebers and NOT the team. They'll all be back in Foxboro
for team meetings this week and Parcells still has to talk with Bob
Kraft. Which will probably be to tell him he wants out. I say if he
really wants to go and leave these kids like this after they busted
their hump for him, then good riddens. He's going to have to look
into these kid's eyes and tell them so.
/BD
|
259.46 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | | Mon Jan 27 1997 13:50 | 6 |
|
Parcells hasn't flown anywhere yet, he is staying in New Orleans
with his family. Plans on checking out bourbon street himself, now that
he can relax and enjoy a little.
Ron
|
259.47 | Has done this before | FRSBEE::GROVES | | Mon Jan 27 1997 14:10 | 7 |
|
I think this is nothing new that Parcells doesn't fly home with the
players after the SB. I hear someplace that Bill didn't fly home with
the team after his other 2 SB. He probably wants time to relax with his
family before facing the owner and media.
Jim
|
259.48 | Sunday Globe article on Kraft/Parcells.. | SOLVIT::BENZ | | Mon Feb 17 1997 15:50 | 17 |
| DId anyone catch the (long) article in Sunday's Boston Globe (2/16/97)
written by Will McDonough? It's quite interesting...goes into
the long tale of the 'story behind the story' and what happened
over the course of the last year between Kraft and Parcells.
I found it interesting that he depicted Kraft as being less than honest
in his dealings...or at least, in what he says from day to day...
Also, Kraft was given a chance to comment on the article before
publication, and his comments were quite fascinating as well.
He basically depicted Will as 'misunderstanding' his comments over
the past year (specifically about draft decisions, etc). And I guess
their 'friendship' is essentially over....
From all the notes here on the topic, I'll bet a few of you would
find it interesting reading...I know I did.
|
259.49 | Enough, Already !! | POWDML::DFARRELL | Dennis Farrell -- MSO2-3/G2 | Mon Feb 17 1997 17:09 | 33 |
| re . 48
Yeah, I read "Will the Schill's" article in the Sunday Globe. Just a
continuation of the "he said/she said soap opera" (IMHO) that his
whole thing is. After I read it and thought about it for awhile my
bottom line observations are:
- This whole episode centers around egos. Kraft and Parcells were in
a game of who could outdo who (publicly and privately).
- Kraft was the consummate micro-manager who felt employee Parcells
had an attitude problem and was a "management challenge."
- Parcells was the prototypical disgruntled employee because he didn't
think the boss trusted his decisions and didn't give him enough say
in the decision making.
- Will McDonough may have a bigger ego than both Parcells and Kraft for
breaking with yet another story that prolongs this sillyness. I like
McDonough's stand on some things, but when it comes to football, I
think you have to take what he says with a LARGE grain of salt. He's
friends with Parcells (and they both have the same agent) and he's
a mouthpiece for the NFL. He claims he's friendly with Kraft too but
I wouldn't bet on it after their already strained relationship can't
be helped by this latest story.
Why can't we just put this all behind us and go forward with the new
regime ???
Jeez, get over it !!
DF
|
259.50 | Don't let your ego get in the way | CSLALL::BRULE | Spring Training is here | Tue Feb 18 1997 08:25 | 17 |
| I read the whole article about 3 times and nothing that Wil wrote
surprised me. Being "best friends" to both he should have stayed away
from the whole thing but he decided to become part of the story. I
think that at the end of the 1995 season when Parcells wanted to
shorten his contract both sides probably should have parted ways.
But when they decided to do one more year all hell was going to break
loose. Kraft didn't trust Parcells with the draft. If I'm an owner and
my coach just shortened his contract I'd think in the long-term
interest of my team I'd let the personell people handle my draft. But I
think I would have sat down with the coach and explain it to him.
Let;s face it there is no black and white on this matter. Just alot of
gray. These two were not going to get along. Parcells ended up with
what he wanted. And for letting Parcells coach a year early Kraft ended
up with 4 draft choices. But McDonough has been the one person who has
had his reputation damaged and that may not be that bad.
Mike
|
259.51 | | ABACUS::FORTIN_C | Your Life Burns Faster, Obey Your Master | Tue Feb 18 1997 09:51 | 5 |
|
I'm sick of Will McDonough, the guy has lost a ton of
credibility this year, in my eyes.
CF
|
259.52 | Will's a jerk! | NIOSS1::ROY_L | | Tue Feb 18 1997 11:33 | 9 |
| I can't stand Will Mcdonough and never could but why do these people
ever have that jerk as a friend? I would be afraid that any time I said
anything to Will that eventually he would use it to sell papers. I did
get a kick out of Kraft not telling him he was drafting Glen and ol
Will gets egg on his face when he claimed that he had the scoop and
that the Pats would take a defensive player. I wouldn't ever tell Will
squat. The article was Will's way of getting back at Kraft.
Leo
|
259.53 | McDonough gave the Parcells' slant | GLRMAI::WILKES | | Tue Feb 18 1997 16:08 | 7 |
| One of the real interesting things about the article is if Kraft had
taken the so-called "High Road" suggested by McDonough on the morning
of the Jacksonville playoof game the Pats would have ended up getting
nothing for Parcells.
Instead the Patriots are getting four good draft picks for one year of
Parcells service. Thank goodness Kraft took the "low road"
|
259.54 | McDonough Should Have Stayed Away | DONVAN::SCOPA | | Wed Feb 19 1997 10:44 | 8 |
| I agree that McDonough should have stayed away from the whole thing.
His relationship with Kraft and Parcells made for some real difficult
and uncomfortable times and in recognizing this he should have said,
"Not me."
He didn't...and his credibility is shot.
Maj
|
259.55 | The real story... yeah right.... | PCBUOA::WALLS | | Tue Feb 25 1997 15:46 | 6 |
|
The fact that McDonough and Parcells has the same agent taints his
reports even more. His agent is'nt going to let him rip into one of his
clients.
Sean
|