Title: | PATHWORKS for OSF/1 |
Notice: | see also NOTED::PWDOSWINV5 (PW client) & TURRIS::DIGITAL_UNIX |
Moderator: | CPEEDY::LONG |
Created: | Thu Apr 22 1993 |
Last Modified: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Number of topics: | 1874 |
Total number of notes: | 6870 |
PW OSF 5.0g ECO 2 / UNIX 3.2 Clients NT3.51 Service PAK 5 and NT4.0 with Office 95 (7.0 Release) Customer connects O: to \\server\pccommon. On that share they store Excel 7.0 files and under unix you see three file locks like the following example: # net file ID Path Usernam # Locks ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 3369 C:\USR\...\SHARES\PCCOMMON\TEST.XLS NEUNTEUFL 3 The command completed successfully. If the customer than closes excel, these file locks don't dissapear and it is impossible to write to the spreadsheet-file again. Under NT 4.0 with the same office suite there are no problems with file locking. It seams that NT3.51 does different things than NT 4.0. Does someone know about lanman.ini parameters to influence file locking or is it a MS Problem ... ? - does it make sense to IPMT this? thanks Werner
T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1870.1 | CPEEDY::HORGAN | Craicailte indiadh damhsa agus cricta�l! | Wed Jun 04 1997 15:29 | 5 | |
Hi Werner, What's in your lanman.ini file? I don't see the locks being kept when you close Excel. Julia | |||||
1870.2 | more info about locks | PCTEAM::SYSTEM | Fri Jun 06 1997 06:01 | 27 | |
lanman.ini: [ server ] userpath=/usr/net/servers/lanman/users srvservices=alerter,netlogon,replicator [ workstation ] domain=fza [ netlogon ] scripts=repl/export/scripts [ replicator ] replicate=export exportlist=fza [ lmxserver ] unixlocks=no ignoreunix=yes Customer uses office 7.0a. If he opens a spreadsheet (from pccommon), changes it and wants to write it back (from NT3.51Client) he gets the error messsage "lanman redirector: cannot write file to buffer". - This message is translated from German. Customer told me that sometimes locks stay with the same ID and sometimes locks disappear correctly. thanks Werner |