Title: | PATHWORKS for OSF/1 |
Notice: | see also NOTED::PWDOSWINV5 (PW client) & TURRIS::DIGITAL_UNIX |
Moderator: | CPEEDY::LONG |
Created: | Thu Apr 22 1993 |
Last Modified: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Number of topics: | 1874 |
Total number of notes: | 6870 |
Windows NT4.0 clients are having multiple sessions open to a pw-osf V5.0geco2 server, resulting in a high number of sessions and access denied errors. For every disk map a session is created. But some of them have a blanco user name. This results in a access denied error on the client. I found a similar problem description in the pwv50ift notes files. -note 4155 and 4198. and in two ipmt cases -cfs49378 and 49402. The story: NT sends a sesssetup smb with a NULL username. This means that when you do a net sessions you see a valid username and a null username. Unfortunately there was a slight problem that when the NULL session request came along, and the active session was the origional username session that the active user was marked as a NULL session. This meant that this user could get access problems on his already connected shares. So a possible bug in NT (the empty username session) caused a bug in PW. The fix now makes sure that we mark the correct session as a NULL session (= the new session). This fixes the access errors but still shows an empty username session (which is valid because NT sends us one). Adrie This is the PW-VMS solution. Is there a solution for Pw-OSF? /Geert Dhaens
T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1830.1 | Enter a CLD | CPEEDY::GARDE | Tue Apr 29 1997 14:58 | 6 | |
We do not have a fix for this, and have seen it on v6.1 as well. Please log a CLD. Thanks. - Ces | |||||
1830.2 | CPEEDY::HORGAN | Craicailte indiadh damhsa agus cricta�l! | Fri May 09 1997 14:53 | 4 | |
The null (ghost) session established by NT 4.0 clients is Microsoft's problem. The issue has been forwarded to Microsoft. Julia | |||||
1830.3 | RANGER::BACHUS::DHAENS | Mon May 12 1997 09:34 | 7 | ||
When can we expect to have a solution? Can we formally state that this problem is from Microsoft, and that the solution will be provided by them? /Geert |