| T.R | Title | User | Personal
Name | Date | Lines |
|---|
| 1713.1 | | RANGER::BACHUS::DHAENS | | Thu Jan 30 1997 10:26 | 4 |
| I didn't had tthe opportunity to test it, but a customer had the same
behaviour!!
Be aware.
|
| 1713.2 | lanmanager security changes after update. | RANGER::BACHUS::DHAENS | | Thu Jan 30 1997 11:43 | 20 |
| I tested it quickly:
i created a with following permissions:
for lanmanager: ntfs:
administrators :full control administrator:full
users:none dhaens:rwcxdap
dhaens:full control
I reinstalled Pathworks V6.1(pre-eco2) (customer needs this one)
and the permissions changed:
lanmanager: ntfs:
everyone:full control administrator : full
dhens : rwcxdap
Now for me the securiy is fine , because ntfs gives me the security i
want.
But the customer implemented the lanmanager security only!!
With every update he had to specify the rights again.
/Geert
|
| 1713.3 | Are we talking the same thing ? | WOTVAX::16.194.208.3::sharkeya | | Fri Jan 31 1997 04:49 | 9 |
| But thats the rights on the SHARENAME - not the directory (isn't it ?). If
so, then all it means is that anyone can 'net use' to it.
Have you looked at the file permissions ?
(as in 'net access c:/usr/users/lanman')
Alan
|
| 1713.4 | lanmaner changed, ntfs untouched at upgrade | RANGER::BACHUS::DHAENS | | Fri Jan 31 1997 09:13 | 11 |
| Yes,
that's right, but i would expect that after an update (ie a
installation of a eco version) the lanmanager security stays the same.
As i expect that the NTFS security is untouched.
As i told you in .2 the ntfs security isn't changed for me. But the
customer implemented his security with the lanmanager security.
/ Geert
|