T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
395.1 | | MKOTS3::RAUH | I survived the Cruel Spa | Tue Jun 25 1996 07:31 | 10 |
| Kathy,
DOCUMENT! DOCUMENT! DOCUMENT! Get affa-davids(sp) outta all these folks
who have seen the ex in her acts. To keep it air tight, you have to
lock down all! You have to get all verbal observations on paper. For
when it comes to court time, many develope amnesia(sp). They don't want
to get involved suddenly. While the iron is hot, and all are spouting
in your behalf, get them to put it to paper ASAP!!
|
395.2 | Extend Temp order. | QUOKKA::17576::PERRY_W | | Tue Jun 25 1996 12:27 | 9 |
|
At the very least try to extend the Temporary custody order.
Maybe six months! Do what Re:1 advised.
Your daughter may want to live with if you ask her. What a difficult
situation. Good luck.
Bill
|
395.3 | | MKOTS3::RAUH | I survived the Cruel Spa | Tue Jun 25 1996 13:09 | 9 |
| Sometimes the daughter might say that she would like to live with you.
And that life might be less of a helter skelter world in your abode
than with dear maamaa.
Children need security as well as many other things in life. And even a
14 year old probably wouldn't mind trading a secure life style vs a
wild and wooly one.
|
395.4 | Thats the justice system for you | QUOKKA::11773::CASEY | | Tue Jun 25 1996 13:32 | 6 |
| It gets even better, the ex's lawyer went in today and had the
temporary order reversed. The ex wrote a letter, saying she does not
have a drinking problem, it was a misunderstanding. That was good
enough for the same judge and thats it. Oh well, so much for the best
interest of the child.
|
395.5 | | QUOKKA::39702::SPICER | | Tue Jun 25 1996 13:39 | 61 |
| Firstly - I don't want to sound critical, but have you asked the child
what she wants ? She's 14 and gets a say in this. Perhaps she would be
happier staying with mom if mom really did get her act together.
The only arguement for a custody change is a real (not imagined or
hearsay) threat to the child's safety. It is not done lightly and this
should be seen as a process, and not a problem that is going to be
solved overnight whatever happens.
You are right - her lawyer will make strong statements to the effect
that she has realized the error of her ways and is making every effort
to rehabilitate herself. In fact this might just be the shock she needs
to wake up.
Her lawyer will also question your motives. If there is a real threat
then why haven't you done anything about it before ? Are you just trying
to get out of paying child support ?
In my opinion the most significant part of your note is that the ex's
own mother is very concerned about it. As a witness she is very
powerful and may tip the scales, especially since she can verify that this
is not a one off aberation and has been going on for years.
The previous noter is right - people do not want to get involved. You
can solve this by sending her a subpeona to attend. That way it's not
voluntary and she is not responsible to explain her to her own daughter
why she was a witness against her.
I suggest that you request a lengthy (at least 6 months) temporary custody
change to establish that mom really has made efforts to improve her ways.
At that point the situation should be reviewed and brought before the
court again. It's up to mom what she does - whether she gets custody
back or you get it permanently.
I don't think you should request a GAL unless it looks like you are
losing your arguement. But frankly I think the court will probably want
one to investigate the case and report back, normally inside of 1 month.
The GAL can look at the whole issue and interview anyone that has any
knowledge of the girl pretty much without limitation (school teachers,
pediatrician, neighbors, relatives, religious leader, you, any other
children in either family unit etc) and make a recommendation. It's up to
you to ensure they are introduced to the people you want them to talk to.
It has been my experience that they take a rosy view of life so be
prepared for that eventuality.
Martin
|
395.6 | ex | QUOKKA::39702::SPICER | | Tue Jun 25 1996 13:50 | 13 |
| I just read .4 and frankly this is what most of us have come to expect
of the probate courts. But if this child is at risk you must get back
into court now.
Her letter is great because you can now prove (through her own mother)
that she lied to the court which doesn't do much for her credibility,
e.g. why should anyone believe her when she says she will get help for
her problem when she is denying it ?
Martin
|
395.7 | Please Go Slowly | MSE1::KBROWN | | Tue Jun 25 1996 18:39 | 29 |
| I would like to bring up two points on this note.
1) I had my children write letters to the court also. It went from my
lawyer and directly to her lawyer. Then all hell broke loose. My
children received physical, verbal and emotional abuse from my ex
and her sister. I even had the police report where the police
was able to see the handprint of my ex still across my daughter
face. It was documented as a mother-daughter fight
2) When the letters were presented to the court officials, the court
mediator's first response was "obviously you coerced your children
into writing these letters, as no child wants to leave their
mother". The Judge also made the same comment when he "reviewed"
the letters. It took another six months of "investigations" by
a GAL (child psychologist) who was able to cut through all the
comments and see that the children's wishes were being followed
though with.
I would just be careful about putting this child in the same situation
my children were in, considering the mother sounds like my ex. It also
depend on the child, but my two stood up for each other and watched out
for each other.
The net results of an anxious several months, I have been custodial
parent for 5.5 years and relishing in the fact they have done quite
well. And looking back there is not another way I would have done it.
Ken
|
395.8 | | QUOKKA::11773::CASEY | | Sun Jul 07 1996 06:42 | 16 |
|
On June 28, they went into court. Judge denied the temporary custody
order but appointed a GAL. Her lawyer also tried to get legal fees of
$1600.00 but the judge denied it. We were very relieved because any
other time she's gone for legal fees, she's gotten them. Ken, could
you send me mail on the name of the GAL that was used in your case.
We have been assigned one from North Andover and I'm curious to see if
it is the same one. This is already getting nasty, the ex is already
making absurd accusations, I can just imagine what crap she is going
to be feeding the GAL. We're getting nervous about people backing off
now that push is coming to shove. Can people refuse to talk to this
GAL if they don't want to get involved. The GAL was chosen by the
judge, our lawyer and her lawyer submitted names and the judge made
the actual decision. Thanks.
Kathy
|
395.9 | | CSC32::HADDOCK | Saddle Rozinante | Mon Jul 08 1996 10:25 | 12 |
| Wish I could offer some other helpful advice here, but the best thing
I can offer at this point is something I heard recently:
Sometimes there is a peace that lies only on the other side of war.
Also you need to take special account on what you consider success.
The primary concern here is he safety of the child. I found after
my second round of court battles that, even though I didn't get
custody, the behavior that most concerned me came to a screeching
halt.
fred();
|