| Title: | Welcome to the Non-Custodial Parents Conference |
| Notice: | Please read 1.* before writing anything |
| Moderator: | MIASYS::HETRICK |
| Created: | Sun Feb 25 1990 |
| Last Modified: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Number of topics: | 420 |
| Total number of notes: | 4370 |
Anyone notice an extra buck taken outta their paycheck above and beyond
the court ordered amout to be garnished. This really gets my hair up!
I gave noone any reason to beleive I could not voluntarily meet my
support obligations. I had garnishment imposed on me. And now It seems
I'm being held accountable for the "added administrative cost" to my
employer for the imposed garnishment! I haven't been able to get an
answer from payroll so I thought I'd see if anybody else could verify
that my speculations are true!
| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 320.1 | True! | QUOKKA::5950::DREYER | Make new friends, but keep the old! | Thu Aug 11 1994 12:18 | 6 |
Yes, this is true. I read in Steve's court order that his company could take no more than $1 per week out of his check to cover their admin. expenses. Laura | |||||
| 320.2 | QUOKKA::26356::VLS_TEMP1 | Dan D(ingeldein) | Thu Aug 11 1994 13:09 | 5 | |
Thanks Laura, Just one more example of abuse of NCP's. Next year it'll
be $2... and the year after that...
It's not the money, it's how they go about getting it that pisses me
off!
| |||||
| 320.3 | "IS THIS EVERYWHERE??" | QUOKKA::27748::LCLARK | Thu Aug 11 1994 14:44 | 9 | |
First of all, where are you located?? And is this a across-the-board
agenda. Or is it only allowed in certain states.
BTW, I live in MASSACHUSETTS
CP - LESLIE
| |||||
| 320.4 | is it a MUST? | QUOKKA::7871::JPOIRIER | Fri Aug 12 1994 08:53 | 21 | |
They're taking out the extra buck in Mass. My husband received notice
that this was going to happen to his check for the child support he
pays. The notice states:
> The amount withheld and paid for your particular order will remain
> the same. The additional nominal fee is being withheld by Digital, for
> the cost of administration, in accordance with State and Federal Law.
He received this notice back in July, it came from Digital Payroll.
I would much rather see the $52 per year going to the children then to
Digital for "the cost of administration". So, how does one go about
getting the garnishment changed? I'm assuming it's a court order that
is necessary. We're still looking into this, if I find any way around
it I'll post it.
Does anyone know the laws around garnishment? Is it something that
MUST be done? Back when my husband first got divorced, I don't think
it was a mandatory thing, but it was a "recommended" solution and he
agreed to it.
| |||||
| 320.5 | QUOKKA::3737::RAUH | I survived the Cruel Spa | Fri Aug 12 1994 10:54 | 6 | |
Letss see... 52 weeks, at $1.00 per week. And how many NCP folks there
in PRM? Sounds like the state is going to again make some money off the
sweat of the working class. Too bad yha cannot go on strike like the
baseball teams.... :)
| |||||