T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
293.1 | | AIMHI::RAUH | I survived the Cruel Spa | Fri Jan 07 1994 14:10 | 3 |
| 1. You can write a motion to shoot the witch. Or....;) you can fight
like crazy to show the system that she is a mooch. You offer her the
option to finish college and thats all.
|
293.2 | | CSC32::HADDOCK | Don't Tell My Achy-Breaky Back | Fri Jan 07 1994 14:38 | 6 |
|
In Colorado the maximum time that they can award "spousal support" is
5 years. It gives them time to get their act together, then it's
out into the cruel world.
fred();
|
293.3 | | SIETTG::HETRICK | some past life sister of my desire | Sat Jan 08 1994 20:47 | 14 |
| My divorce stipulation is that my ex-wife gets alimony for three
years, which is (my attorney told me) considered a standard term for
alimony in New Hampshire when alimony is awarded, which it usually is
not. The intent of alimony is to permit the ex-spouse to regain a
position of self-support, where that position was lost as a result of
dedicating work to the home rather than to a paying position. As more
of the same, I have to pay expenses she may incur taking graduate
courses, should she pass the course, again with a three year time
limit, and with a generous dollar amount cap.
However, a co-worker is paying alimony with no time limit, so
such awards can happen.
Brian
|
293.4 | | AIMHI::RAUH | I survived the Cruel Spa | Sun Jan 09 1994 16:36 | 6 |
| I have been told that Alimony was illegal or etc in New Hampshire.
Again, count your lucky stars that its only three years. Be careful
that it is only for three years.
mtb
|
293.5 | From the Massachusetts Court | STOWOA::BROWN_K | KEN BROWN DCC/CIS DESKTOP CONSULTANT | Sun Jan 09 1994 19:07 | 16 |
|
Ex gave up all rights to alimony at divorce agreement, however,
this increased the amount of child support....Back in 1987.
In 1991, I received temporary custody of my children, Judge
ordered six months of alimony to be paid.
In 1992, after six months evaluation of children, Judge ordered
payment of alimony for one year additional. Judge did not want
ex to become a ward of the State!
Agreements aren't worth the paper they are drawn up on.
Insight from a personal and expensive experience......
Ken
|
293.6 | | AIMHI::RAUH | I survived the Cruel Spa | Mon Jan 10 1994 08:01 | 3 |
| Ken,
I thought that if your wife had a job, that she didn't qualify?
|
293.7 | time will tell..... | NAVY5::SDANDREA | I wannabe the mayor of Kalamazoo | Tue Jan 11 1994 10:27 | 15 |
| I guess the thing that bugs me is the old fashioned attitude of "she
deserves alimony" since we were married so long. I don't get the
logic. I invested as much as her in the marriage, I came out with alot
less, and while we were married she started and quit college (with my
support) at least 4 times. She still contends that she will get
awarded permanent alimony based on the fact that we were married so
long and that her earning potential is lower than mine. What???
Nobody 'gave' me anything I have today. I worked and scrapped to improve
my lifestyle and I guess I feel my ex ought to do the same.
I have heard that the South Carolina family courts are getting a little
tougher on 'dependant' ex spouses with a 'poor me' attitude. We'll
find out this summer..........
steve
|
293.8 | One Woman's Point of View. | LJSRV2::JOHNSON | | Wed Mar 02 1994 09:51 | 11 |
| My two cents...as a woman, I never could understand it when my
'sisters' put themselves in a position that clearly says, "I have
no pride and choose to be dependent upon you for as long as possible."
Even if it is considered a punishment to their former husbands, it's
really a pathethic statement, and I always wonder about their apparent
lack of self-esteem.
I wish you luck, but perhaps you should be keeping your eyes open for
a new husband for her!
Karen
|
293.10 | and takes better care of herself....... | NAVY5::SDANDREA | Tonya wacked Jimmy Hoffa | Thu Mar 03 1994 12:56 | 9 |
| >>I wish you luck, but perhaps you should be keeping your eyes open for
>>a new husband for her!
Thanks, Karen.
On the subject of a new husband I'm afraid there's little hope until she regains
some self esteem........
Steve
|
293.11 | YES!!!! | QUOKKA::36922::SDANDREA | Plonk, Roost, and Jam, what a country! | Thu Apr 28 1994 08:26 | 23 |
| My case finally came up in South Carolina court yesterday, on the
complaints my ex filed against me last August regarding my alleged
refusal to comply with certain terms of our seperation agreement. Her
complaints were unfortunately based on what she "wished" our agreement
says and not on fact. She also included some untruths in the complaint
that my lawyer uncovered thru the discovery process. The bottom line
is her complaint and defense was totally without substance and her
lawyer was forced to advise her NOT to go into court, but rather settle
outside in the lobby (thus saving face for him). Bottom line:
I am forever relieved of alimony payments.
I am forever relieved of any obligation to provide her with medical or
life insurance.
I am not liable for any of her past or future medical expenses
Child support for my oldest daughter ends in 4 weeks, forever.
I agreed to pay $35 more per week in child support for my youngest
daughter until next summer when she graduates.
This settlement was beyond my wildest dreams. I can now get on with my
life and help my daughters with theirs as my ex wife will hopefully get
on with hers. It's been a long 4 years.......
steve
|
293.12 | | QUOKKA::3737::RAUH | I survived the Cruel Spa | Thu Apr 28 1994 09:13 | 10 |
| Congrads Steve! Count your blessings that it went the way it did. There
is a man in Littleton New Hampshire who is paying child support to his
non custodial ex wife. And he is to pay this for some time to come.
Under normal cir, one would call this alimony or maintence. But she is
married, and we know that if she re-marries that would be also illegal.
But this is New Hampshire for you.
And remember when the elections start to happen and people start
telling you what a civic minded, law abiding bunch of folks we have
here in the state. Remember this man.
|
293.13 | Good work. Thanks for letting us know. | QUOKKA::29067::HADDOCK | Don't Tell My Achy-Breaky Back | Thu Apr 28 1994 09:45 | 5 |
|
Add my congratulations. Goes to show that putting up a fight is
is a pain in the &^%$, but often pays off.
fred();
|
293.14 | incredible...... | QUOKKA::36922::SDANDREA | I got yer huckleberry... | Thu Apr 28 1994 10:03 | 4 |
| Thanks for the good cheer......my documenting EVERYTHING was a real
blessing. I still can't believe it!
steve
|
293.15 | California SCREAMING... | QUOKKA::16616::DREHER | | Sun May 01 1994 09:44 | 23 |
|
I'm in Southern California and looking for some HELP with my alimony
situation.
The root issue is that I am currently paying alimony for LIFE due to my
ex-wife's claims of medical disabilities preventing her from working.
I am seeking any resources that have addressed any similiar situation and
successfully obtained a termination date of the alimony.
Any pointers to lawyer's, men's groups, legal precedence, State
legislatures, etc. would be very helpful.
Please copy me on your reply at HIGHD::DREHER
Tks,
Jim.
(P.S. Just for my own sanity, can anyone give me an understanding of
"the other side"? What gives a woman the right to receive support from
me for life? I can understand up to the length of the marriage but I
simply am having difficulty in dealing with paying her for LIFE.)
|
293.16 | How long will the three years last ... | QUOKKA::56517::GRAY | Follow the hawk, and enjoy the view ... | Mon May 02 1994 07:49 | 20 |
|
FWIW - While I was going through my divorce I read a document
written by a judge about divorce. I don't remember the name of
the paper or the judge - but it took the position that divorce
was not the termination of a relationship, but a means of allowing
the people to separate so that one or both of them could marry
some other person. The paper was written with the idea that the
man was responsible to support the children and the woman
forever, even if he married again - it really scared me.
My alimony (state of NH) was for 3 years, than it was extended
for a few additional months (her and her boyfriend were moving
and she needed a few extra dollars). Every time I question a
lawyer about this I get a lot of tap dancing and the impression
that even thought she is remarried, she has the option of asking
me for alimony anytime for the rest of my life, and if the judge
feels that she needs the money (disability, bad luck, etc) and
that I have it, then alimony can be reinstated.
Richard
|
293.17 | become and activist for men's rights | QUOKKA::29067::HADDOCK | Don't Tell My Achy-Breaky Back | Mon May 02 1994 09:11 | 27 |
|
re .15
I'd start by bringing this situation to the attention of your state
Senator and representative. Especially in the light of "no fault"
divorce. I can understand laws that would prevent some jerk from
abandoning his seriously ill wife. I've seen it happen. I'm not
saying this is your case, but you asked what would justify this
situation. However, I also think that there needs to be some serious
penalties for false accusation and false evidence. Those penalties
also need to be enforced.
Second, I'd try to get evidence that she is not really disabled.
what type of activities (especially physical) does she participate
in. A photo or two of her boogying the night away with her beau
can work wonders in court. Maybe higher a private detective to
follow her for a few days. Sure private detectives are expensive,
but so is paying alimony for the rest of your life.
It may not fix the situation, but it may give you some satisfaction
in fighting back. Get enough guys fighting back, and the politicians
will have to start listening sooner or later--or find another line of
work.
Even one in a million chance is infinately better than zero chance.
fred();
|
293.18 | | QUOKKA::3737::RAUH | I survived the Cruel Spa | Mon May 02 1994 10:18 | 11 |
| If your out of the house, and she has a beau living with her. That can
help your case too. As in are we subsidising not only her, but her,
him,and them. ....
I will also vote a mens rights activist. There isnt enough of us to
fight the limo liberals that are big in vesting our lives to someone
who things we are all a bunch of nuckle draggen, nenderthas that take
some sort of sick pride of taking a poke at our ex's with our fist.
p
a
|
293.19 | How is your case going? | QUOKKA::3737::RAUH | I survived the Cruel Spa | Tue May 03 1994 08:27 | 1 |
|
|
293.20 | more good news....what a month! | QUOKKA::36922::SDANDREA | Tonya Rodham Bobbit; the date from hell | Wed May 04 1994 09:35 | 4 |
| I just learned that my ex-wife is getting married in 2 weeks........I'm
not surprised.
8*)
|
293.21 | | QUOKKA::3737::RAUH | I survived the Cruel Spa | Wed May 04 1994 09:41 | 6 |
| Here is a real good one to watch. :) There is a guy here in dec, whose
ex wife married just before the official date of the legal divorce.
So, in essence, she was married to both men.:) There is a law
against this sort of poopie. Anyhow, guess your off the hook! And get
a copy of this from the town records!:)
|