T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
242.1 | | AIMHI::RAUH | I survived the Cruel Spa | Thu Jan 07 1993 11:06 | 8 |
| I have heard some very successful stories, lately as well. In not so
recient past, its was 'too bad' for the NCP. There is still allot of
discrimination towards men as they try to win custody.
A contact in Littleton New Hampsire HAS custody. And is having a very
difficult time trying to get the system to reverse child support. As
in, he is STILL paying child support to his ex wife who has does not
have custody.
|
242.2 | | PCCAD::DINGELDEIN | PHOENIX | Thu Jan 07 1993 12:51 | 3 |
| re .1
That sounds absolutely ridiculous. The judge overseeing the case should
be removed from the bench for incompetence.
|
242.3 | | AIMHI::RAUH | I survived the Cruel Spa | Thu Jan 07 1993 14:43 | 10 |
| How about the lawyers doing alittle back scratching? You do this for my
case, and I'll help you do that for your case. The ones that your
loosing money at.
The opposing camps attorney seems to be unavail when the motion becomes
a hearing. And Imagain this,,,,,, how about if your client is not able
to pay, so you give her extended payments of child support so she can
pay her bills.......... Maybe this might be more the case? If Mr.
Littleton has been Mrs. Littleton. There would be no question of child
support money. Rather sexist isn't it.
|
242.4 | any ideas??? | EARRTH::MACKINNON | | Fri Mar 12 1993 06:41 | 11 |
|
re -1
Yes it is rather sexist. However, it is a sexist attitude of the
judge!!!! He/She is the one who has to have the reality of a
divorce slapped in his/her face before any change in his/her
attitude is to take place. So any ideas on how to change
the judges attitudes to help make things better for all
concerned?
|
242.5 | | AIMHI::RAUH | I survived the Cruel Spa | Fri Mar 12 1993 06:50 | 3 |
| Yes, record and document all things that go on in your case. And sue
the pants/panties off all those who violate your civil rights. Bottom
line.
|
242.6 | Possible Conversion? | CSC32::K_HYDE | Yes, we do windows -- CX03-2/J4 592-4181 | Wed Apr 28 1993 21:49 | 14 |
| Re: .1
Check the law. There may be interesting lawsuit in felony conversion on
this. ie, The money is intended for the children, file a lawsuit on
behalf of the children to get the money into their control or their
primary caretaker's control with an agreement to have it accounted for
by a CPA. If the money has "disappeared", then the children's money
has been converted.
I've heard fathers talk about going for enforcement based on Coogan
laws, but I've never heard of one who's tried.
Kurt
|