T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
232.1 | | AIMHI::RAUH | I survived the Cruel Spa | Tue Sep 15 1992 09:28 | 17 |
| It is best not to do a class act. Because you get a once around. Plus
if your class loose, they (DOR) can do what ever their little black
hearts want. Best is mono-e-mono!:)
Yes, DOR cannot do this, and if you show the courts that the money is
being paid, you can sue the DOR, and Sue the panites off the ex. I
would do both.
The posture of DOR is that they wish to remain a fault-less entity.
Meaning, they are above the law, and like some state or goverment(s)
you cannot sue them. WRONG! Supreme court of the land has not determine
that they are or are not imune to lidigation. Have fun and remember
this. That I will cost them $$$,$$$.$$ if you do go pro-se. Kinda like
shooting down F111's with bambo rockets. Nothing to loose, execpt
your job if you get thrown in jail. But when the ex pulls this kinda
crappie, your on your way to the Gray Bar Motel anyhow. So you have
nothing to loose.
|
232.3 | BLAM! BLAM! HALT! | MEMORY::SOVIE | | Tue Sep 15 1992 11:16 | 24 |
|
Dan, I had a similar thing happen to me, but the DOR didn't do it
on it's own. The court ordered an additional 25% until $850 was
paid off based on an AFFIDAVIT the EX signed.... no due process
I wasn't notified of anything until payroll sent me a letter
explaining the new deduction rate. It took me 4 days ( over 2 month
span ) to get my money back.... plus the degradation/abuse of the
scum of the probation dept.... it's just another example of the
abuse of power
I have a friend who lives in Groton who HAD a dog, (the dog died last
fall). My friend's been away on vacation for 2 weeks, he got a
$35.00 ticket in the mail which basically said he has been OBSERVED
in voliation of of the Dog Licience law, and he has 21 days
to go to the court and prove he's not a outlaw.
The ticket was dated Aug 26, postmarked Sept 11 and he recieved
it Sept 14, (today is the 21st day). This guilty until proven
innocent crap is really getting out of hand. Every day our
freedoms are being eroded. The government is the first one to
ask why when somebody pings out and does something drastic.
|
232.4 | | AIMHI::RAUH | I survived the Cruel Spa | Tue Sep 15 1992 12:27 | 1 |
| Remember that Dead Dogs don't wear Plad...:)
|
232.5 | | CSC32::HADDOCK | Don't Tell My Achy-Breaky Back | Tue Sep 15 1992 13:30 | 13 |
|
re .0
If he can prove that he _has_ paid all of the support, (ie canceled
checks) he will likely have grounds for one whopper of a law suit
against his ex and probably against DOR as an accessory for not doing
their job and checking things out before jumping into court agains him.
NEVER NEVER NEVER NEVER NEVER NEVER PAY CS IN CASH!!!!!! If he did
and if he doesn't have some sort of proof that he paid it, then
he's neck deep in the feedlot without overshoes.
fred();
|
232.6 | | MAGEE::SKOWRONEK | | Wed Sep 16 1992 11:08 | 49 |
|
Personally, I don't think there is anything he can do, other than go to
court and explain that he wasn't behind in his payment. (I am assuming
they increased his support payments to make up for his arrearage (??) and
once that is caught up, the amount will go back down.) If he proves
that he wasn't behind, then they will just adjust the support payment
to reflect this, but I don't thing there are any grounds for a lawsuit.
And if there was it would be alot of time and money put out on your
friends part, and the return would not justify the cost.
When I went to court for child support for my daughter, my ex agreed to
just deposit the money weekly into my savings account (he works for DEC
also). It was explained to him that all he has to do is miss TWO
payments, and I can go down and have his wages garnished. He said he
understood. Things were going fine for a while, then he started to
miss payments. I did everything I could do to get the money from him
nicely without having to go back to court. I called him, wrote him,
etc. Each time we spoke, it was a nice conversation with him telling
me that he was in class and his paychecks/timecards got screwed up and
that he would be putting the $$ in the account asap.
Then another week went by, I made another call and he started arguing
with me about the money, telling me that he wasn't going to pay
anything and that he was cutting off all medical insurance for my
daughter. Now, I'm sorry, but $80 per week plus medical is not much
money for someone to pay, especially when the daycare cost alone was
$110/week.
To make along story short, I took a day off from work, went down to the
courthouse and filed for wage garnishment. I ended up loosing about 3
- 4 weeks of support, but at least I get my check every week. I also
feel that wage garnishment is cheaper for the non custodial parent
anyways. You don't need to write a check, therefore pay for a bank
service charge, you don't need to use a stamp, and there is always a
record --- the ex can't say she didn't get paid when she actually was.
The way I look at it is, you're gonna pay the money anyway, why not
just have it taken out of your pay. You may say that you are loosing
your rights, but do you say you are loosing your rights when MetPAy
takes your insurance out of your check, when DEC takes your medical
costs out of your check, etc.?? It is the same thing.
I don't mean this note to sound harsh, so please don't take it that
way,
Thanks
Debby
|
232.7 | Reply | PCCAD::DINGELDEIN | PHOENIX | Wed Sep 16 1992 12:07 | 14 |
| Debby,
I understand what you are saying. but....
The DOR is an administrative nightmare. When they screw things up it
takes forever to get it fixed.
You sound like an honest, straightforward woman. But many aren't.
To allow the DOR to arbitrarily decide that someone is in arrears on
accusations alone does't give the DOR or anyone else to take money from
someone until the allegations are substantiated. Due process cannot
be subjugated for any reason. It's a fundamental constitutional right.
The fact that a government agency can act independently of the
judicial system is the other piece of this problem. A hearing must
find just cause for collecting arrears, not allegations!
Dan D.
|
232.8 | | AIMHI::RAUH | I survived the Cruel Spa | Wed Sep 16 1992 13:06 | 20 |
| Of course there is suit. Anytime your falsely accused, falsely
arrested, falsely this or that, and there is damages/injury, you bet
your bippy there is a suit. Thing to do is to keep the cost against
them very low, and make it very costly for them to chase or fight back.
When ever you step into court, you should always make sure you have
your civil rights in motion. Request a court recorder. And do not speak
till the fingers are moving or the wheels of justice are turning.
You should always have all the information to prove your point.
Everytime DOR/DCYS gets money from your pocket, they can now show how
efficiently they are running their administrition. They can also
get more funds from the federal goverment as a match set. Hence
there is a bounty on you NCP's. And DOR/DCYS is lookng for you.
Debby,
No your not sounding hostile. Your doing fine. In your case, you had
no other option. There are many stories on both sides of the fence.
|
232.9 | Thanks | MAGEE::SKOWRONEK | | Wed Sep 16 1992 14:01 | 15 |
|
Thank you Dan and George, I understand your point now. Thankfully I am
not in a position where I need to deal with the DOR, but I can
understand that it could end up as a nightmare to try to get $$ back
that you overpaid. Dan, I can also understand your friends frustration
with the whole matter. Personally, I don't think it is fair what
happened to him. Lets all hope & pray that the judicial system will
eventually start being more equal to non_custodial_parents (ie. Dads).
Good luck to your friend in whatever he does. Please let us know what
the outcome of this is, for future reference.
Thanks
Debby
|
232.10 | | AIMHI::RAUH | I survived the Cruel Spa | Wed Sep 16 1992 14:57 | 10 |
| Debby,
Your welcome. And yes, lets pray that someday there will be justice
for the NCP. For someday, if it has not happened to you already,
you just might marry an NCP. And if the ex is a wild and crazed woman,
you will never have peace. You might even find yourself in bankruptcy
court, might even find yourself assulted by her and other such horra
stories. Yes, there is justice. But you will have to work very hard for
it. And chances of recovering over paid money. It won't happen.
|
232.11 | Let's hope everyone doesn't do it ... | CTHQ::GRAY | Follow the hawk, and enjoy the view | Wed Sep 16 1992 15:12 | 18 |
|
.6> The way I look at it is, you're gonna pay the money anyway, why not
> just have it taken out of your pay. You may say that you are loosing
> your rights, but do you say you are loosing your rights when MetPAy
> takes your insurance out of your check, when DEC takes your medical
> costs out of your check, etc.?? It is the same thing.
In my opinion, this is logically correct, and in some cases
necessary, however there is a side to this that is emotional.
Imagine that the electric company, telephone company,
bank/landlord, garnish YOUR check for the amount due!? Would it
be unpleasant to know that they could do it WITHOUT your
permission?
I pay my electric bill on time, but if I was late, it would still
upset me to have them garnish my check without my permission.
Richard
|
232.12 | | AIMHI::RAUH | I survived the Cruel Spa | Wed Sep 16 1992 15:20 | 4 |
| To suport Richards point also, you can become up to 90 days late before
the utilitie company comes after you. And if you say your having a tuff
time they can and often cut you slack. But, as an NCP, the ex cuts your
throat.:) Logical to me?:)
|
232.13 | IRS Blues | PCCAD::DINGELDEIN | PHOENIX | Wed Sep 16 1992 16:02 | 13 |
| RE: RAUH
Good point, and a key one at that. What's the justification for abuse
of power.
One other piece of info. Anyone accused of arrears is referred to the
"Tax Return Intercept Unit". Once they're involved you're in trouble.
Lets say your $300 behind. They will notify the IRS and aquire your
return, say $2000. This money goes into the "general fund", $300 goes
to the Custodial parent and you have to file court action to recover
the rest. Could take 6 months to get a hearing and there is no
guarantee the judge will award you the $1700 balance owed you!
I've talked to people who've been at it for 2 years trying to recover
moneys owed them!!! What a mess!@#$##!@#$%
Dan D
|
232.14 | | AIMHI::RAUH | I survived the Cruel Spa | Thu Sep 17 1992 07:52 | 6 |
| ....and if your trying to pay the hers, mine, and the childrens
attornies back. That is a tuff sled to drag in the sand. Never mind
paying for maintence/alimonie, car insurance, health insurance,
mortgage on the marritial home that they will live in, and trying to
put some cloths on your back, food in your hollow tummy and wheels
under your feet.
|
232.15 | Question on over payment | QUOKKA::38400::SMITH | I FEEL THE NEED | Wed Nov 08 1995 05:53 | 23 |
| Three years ago, my x came after me for non payment even though she had
been getting paid. She claimed THIRTEEN YERAS on non payment. About 20k
worth. All a bunch of pure unadulterated crap but stuff the DOR just
LOVES to get their hands on.
Without going into all the civil rights violations, violations of
existing laws, and ignoring court orders that the DOR routinely
does/did, it's over now. As of a couple of weeks ago, the support
order, in all respects, has been terminated.
My question is this. Support payments were being made through a wage
attachment (actually, I agreed to set it up this way). The support owed
was all paid up as of the middle of June. Wanna guess whether the DOR
released the attachment or not??????????? My calls were ignored, I
could get NO information from anyone and to make a long story short,
the DOR ended up taking almost 2K more than what was owed by the time I
was finally able to get before a judge and get it stopped.
Naturally, the DOR isn't the least bit interested in talking about the
excess they took. Does anyone have any suggestions, or has anyone been
successful in getting this money back from the DOR??????????
Steve
|
232.16 | DOR is a hopeless mess of... | QUOKKA::29169::SMITH | | Wed Nov 08 1995 09:26 | 30 |
| I know exactly what you mean, from the other end. When after two years
of DOR lying to me and never returning my phone calls, I finally put in
a complaint. When the DOR rep finally was forced to meet with me to
send a request to North Carolina for collection (something I'd been
told had been done for two years) he was not at all prepared, even
though he knew I was on a lunch break from work and the appointment was
made a week in advance.
He refused to use a calulator, insisting he was a mathamatical wiz.
Every month of payment, amount due, and balance had to be separately
written and figured for 4 years (though it was on computer somewhere
else and I'm sure he could have done it that way if he'd had a clue).
When he came up with a number which was $2000 to low, he told me that
was good enough, I said it wasn't, he had to find the mistake. When I
took out my calulator, he took this as an insult. He tried again,
found a couple mistakes and came up with another number. Since it had
been two hours, I'm sure he figured he had time on his side and tried
to get me to sign a BLANK, NOTERIZED statement, telling me he'd put the
amount in later when he found his mistake. I refused, he said I'd have
to come back, I refused to leave. He left and fumed to his boss and
everyone in the office I'm sure. He came back and went over the numbers
again, this time coming up with an almost correct number to the penny,
except it was exactly $3000 more than what my ex owed. He told me he'd
write it up, I should be happy with that, "you can sign it NOW!". I
refused. He left and fumed some more, I knew the error had to be at
the end of the calulations because it was so close, I found it. The
correct DOC was signed and noterized, and sent to North Carl., 2 weeks
later my ex moved. It probably wasn't worth it. The DOR is hopeless
for help on either end. I hate to call them again.
Sharon
|
232.17 | .. | PASTA::MENNE | | Wed Nov 08 1995 11:15 | 2 |
| There is only one way to deal with the DOR but that belongs in the
SOLDIER_OF_FORTUNE notes file.
|
232.18 | Soldier of Fortune....I like it!!!!! | QUOKKA::38400::SMITH | I FEEL THE NEED | Thu Nov 09 1995 05:41 | 34 |
| So I take it no one has ever been successful at getting anything back
from the DOR. I figured as much but thought I'd ask anyway. I've pretty
much written it off.
The sad part of this whole thing is that people (in general) and even
alot of people that have the DOR working "for" them don't have a clue
just how bad the DOR is. They are quite litterally ABOVE THE LAW. They
do whatever they want, whenever they want, and could care less about
laws and even judges orders. Both myself and my attorney were told, on
a conference call with a senior member of the DOR, that they ROUTINELY
ignore judges orders. No big deal.
The problem is, and I predict that this will happen not to far down the
road, when you have an entity like the DOR that is running TOTALLY out
of control and thumbs it's nose at the laws, they will eventually do
something to someone thats SO outrageous, and so illegal, they won't be
able to sweep it under the rug, and our spineless politicians won't be
able to look the other way. When that day comes, everything will come
out and the politicians, fearing for their jobs, will "pretend" they
had NO IDEA what was going on and will clamp down on the DOR. The only
way they will be able to do that is to "restrict" what the DOR can do
by making it harder to go after people that should be paying support.
Unfortunately, the only ones that will end up suffering because of that,
are the women, men and children who really need the help.
To tell you the truth, I really surprised that individual women,
women's groups involved with getting laws passed, etc. aren't climbing
all over the DOR to get them to clean up their collective acts before
they screw it up for everyone. Ma. has some of the toughest laws on the
books with regards to child support. All the DOR has to do is FOLLOW
those laws and stop making up their own. You know what they say about
giving someone enough rope..........
Steve
|
232.19 | harrass DOR | PASTA::MENNE | | Thu Nov 09 1995 10:42 | 10 |
| Steve,
If the DOR owes you money get it back when you do your state
taxes. Put it down as an over payment of taxes or whatever else
you can think off. Take them to small claims court, get home phone
numbers of upper management and call them at home, call the news media,
call Jerry Williams on WRKO, do anything and everything. They stole
your money, if you can't get your money back get revenge.
Mike
|
232.20 | | MKOTS3::RAUH | I survived the Cruel Spa | Thu Nov 09 1995 11:38 | 3 |
| Remember also, your Governer is about to give hurt to allot of their
cronies. So there is a wee bit of good news.:)
|
232.21 | Mitchell Adams | PASTA::MENNE | | Fri Nov 10 1995 09:42 | 2 |
| Mitchell Adams, I believe, is the head of the DOR. Find out where he
lives and hound hime at home.
|
232.22 | | MKOTS3::RAUH | I survived the Cruel Spa | Fri Nov 10 1995 14:49 | 3 |
| Then serve him with a sopinia to cough up the money! Or put a lein on
his house.!"_)
|
232.23 | How about this | QUOKKA::38400::SMITH | I FEEL THE NEED | Wed Nov 15 1995 13:25 | 13 |
| I was considering good old small claims court. Given that the DOR will
undoubtedly maintain their "we don't HAVE to do anything" attitude, no
one will show, and I win by default.
Naturally, they're not going to pay me anything so I go back in a
couple of weeks and now they owe me MORE cause they still won't show.
They STILL won't give me anything so after the third time, I believe,
they will owe me more again AND I get to have someone arrested...........
Now let's see. Who's name do I put on the form???????????
Steve 8^)
|
232.24 | Sue your lawyer or ex | DANGER::MCCLURE | | Thu Nov 16 1995 07:08 | 17 |
|
.15 the DOR ended up taking almost 2K more than what was owed by the time I
.15 was finally able to get before a judge and get it stopped.
Were you represented by a lawyer when you went before the judge ?
I would think the lawyer should be able to tell you how to get the
excess back. My understanding is that when a motion is filed to get
support changed, it can be filed in two ways. In one way the change is
effective only when you get to court, in the other way the change is
retroactive to the date of filing. If the lawyer didn't file it correctly
maybe you have a suit against him ??
Perhaps you should be asking the ex for the back support ??
Unless you have evidence the DOR didn't give the money to your ex,
you are probably wasting your time to pursue them in court. If your
ex doesn't want to give the excess to you, perhaps you should take her
to small claims ??
|
232.25 | | MKOTS3::RAUH | I survived the Cruel Spa | Thu Nov 16 1995 07:43 | 2 |
| Perhaps some good news comes out of the goverment shutdown...;) Some
their pals are on the streets....
|
232.26 | question | QUOKKA::24661::DEWITT | some promises never should be spoken | Thu Dec 07 1995 11:32 | 23 |
| Maybe this is where this note belongs...
Several week's back, we received a letter from the state of Indiana
stating my spouse owed 9 weeks of backdated support and they were
taking our taxes - I could file injured spouse and he could request an
administrative hearing. After calling the # on the letter 15 times, he
gave up and sent a certified return receipt requesting the hearing.
Note: they tried once before through USERA to collect a false
arrearage and we won.
My spouse pays through the MA DOR - we can account for every single
payment - his child support account is current!
Can anything be done about this harassment from the state of Indiana?
How many times can they try to get money they are not owed?
etc. etc. etc.
any feedback appreciated.
joyce
|
232.27 | | QUOKKA::24661::DEWITT | some promises never should be spoken | Thu Dec 07 1995 11:53 | 14 |
| Got interrupted....
Given he requested the admin. hearing in the state where the order was
issued (MA - when the URESA action took place the State of MA issued a
child support order, the original order was issued in KY)
can they go ahead and take the tax money - or do they have to await the
outcome of the admin. hearing in MA.
oops
gotta go
joyce
|
232.28 | | MKOTS3::RAUH | I survived the Cruel Spa | Thu Dec 07 1995 13:26 | 15 |
| IF and when you do go to a hearing. 'MAKE SURE IT IS A RECORDED
HEARING!!!' As in, there is a court recorder. And at no time do you
discuss anything with out it present. Wether it is a tape machine or it
is a person typing. Nothing is said execpt, that you want one and
reqested one, and that you want to rescual this hearing till one is set
up.
Insofar as beating them. Your best bet is to now start going to the
press, going to the media, and letting the world know of this constant
crappie happening in your life. You cannot continue to pay and pay and
pay for their mess ups and it is time to laundry their wash to the
world. Esp if they will NOT reply to your phones,letters, or fax's!
Get out on Internet, get it to how ever will talk to you with a camera!
|
232.29 | | MKOTS3::RAUH | I survived the Cruel Spa | Thu Dec 07 1995 13:31 | 12 |
| For the past 5 years, I have read nothing but the heart burns of your
plight with the system, to which you have seen nothing but more heart
burn. Now its time to burn them with going public. And making sure that
the world gets a gander of what a bunch of crooked people are running
the system. And how insencitive they are to listening to you. How many
times have you been to court? How many miles have you driven to ensure
that the SO's children were being raised right? How many hours have you
put into this crap?
flame off.
|
232.30 | | CSC32::HADDOCK | Saddle Rozinante | Thu Dec 07 1995 13:35 | 19 |
|
If you have proof that you do not owe the money, and can show that they
should also have that information, then if they do go ahead and take
your tax return, the subsequent lawsuit for malicious prosecution will
make you very rich.
If you pay the support through the registry of the court, then you
can get a certified copy of the printout showing all the support
is current. Send it to them registered mail, return receipt. Then
if they take your tax return, get a lawyer and haul them into Federal
Court.
I made the mistake with the state of Minnesota on the very same issue.
I spent a bunch of $$$ of my own money after I sent them all the court
papers showing that I had paid all support and the support order had
been canceled making long distance phone calls to get them to admit
all support had been paid. If I had just let them go ahead....
fred();
|
232.31 | | QUOKKA::24661::DEWITT | some promises never should be spoken | Mon Dec 11 1995 06:34 | 18 |
| re. 29
Given that I married my husband in March of '92 and joined this file in
the vicinity of that date - you need to check your math.
I didn't enter this note to be flamed at - I asked for information. I
realize this is an emotionally charged subject for alot of people,
myself included, but I don't appreciate your 2 responses. If you don't
have constructive information/advice please don't reply.
re. 30
Thanks Fred for your informative reply, I have shared the information
with my spouse.
Respectfully,
Joyce
|
232.32 | | DANGER::MCCLURE | | Mon Dec 11 1995 07:05 | 12 |
|
re. 31
I often have trouble understanding what George is trying to
say, and I may be wrong, but I think that in .29 he was attempting
to be supportive of you. I think his message was not to flame you,
but to flame the system (DOR).
The other message is that people having trouble with the DOR
need to fight back and maybe taking your story to the press will
help others.
Perhaps another way to get help is to write your state
representative and explain how the DOR has been uncooperative.
|
232.33 | | QUOKKA::24661::DEWITT | some promises never should be spoken | Mon Dec 11 1995 12:01 | 12 |
| re. 31
I appreciate your inputs - I've had more than one phone conversation
with George. Perhaps I did misread his note...
The problem is with the DOR in *Indiana* - they are initiating this -
not the MA DOR. Although I had to threaten civil rights violations
when the URESA action took place 2 years ago.
thanks
joyce
|
232.34 | | MKOTS3::RAUH | I survived the Cruel Spa | Tue Dec 12 1995 08:02 | 13 |
| Joyce,
Yes, I was not meaning to flame on you. I was pee'ed at DOR. I have had
friends with their run ins with these people. I have seen them do some
jack booted things. One in New Hampshire actually came in to a guys
apartment and dragged him out of his bedroom in the cold snow. And
chucked his body into a waiting van. The whole thing was a trump up on
the exs part to break his spirt to get any part of visation. As you are
trying to do. Every time I read your notes Joyce, I cringe, and
sometimes cry over the horras that your and your husband go thru. There
was a time when you could not find the kids cause she hid them in some
part of the state? WV or some place?
|
232.35 | | QUOKKA::24661::DEWITT | some promises never should be spoken | Tue Dec 12 1995 14:54 | 19 |
| George,
She had them in Florida for a long time, then in Louisville and
once we found them, then she moved them to Indiana where they have
been.
We have visitation - but the Court never does anything to her when
she violates the visitation agreement...
We had talked about moving to KY and when that didn't take place
she maintained "since he wasn't spending quality time with the kids -
she wanted an increase". Of course - you can't spend quality time with
kids you can't see....
such is life
thanks
j
|