| T.R | Title | User | Personal
Name | Date | Lines |
|---|
| 186.1 | looks like fauad to me | CSC32::HADDOCK | SYS$CMGOD(); | Mon Dec 23 1991 08:50 | 32 |
| re. 0
Interesting. If he has indeed been collecting from AFDC *and* his
mother, he has been committing fraud on AFDC. They are likely to
not take very kindly to that ( read criminal charges ).
I just finisned fighting the state of Minnesota to a standstill
over a similar problem. It seems that my ex was collecting AFDC
for two months after I got custody of the children. The were
trying to attach my tax returns to pay the "child support".
Last July I sent them the papers showing I had custody and my
child support was stopped ( good thing I got an order signed on
stopping support instead of just letting it go ), *and* a payment
schedule from the court showing *all* my support payments had
been made.
At my wife's urging I made a follow up call last week. The woman in
the child support enforcement section told tried to tell me I *still*
owed the "back support". I told her she'd better go look at the papers
again. She tried to tell me she didn't get the papers. I told her
that I'd sent them registered mail *and* I have the receipt, so she
d*** well did too have the papers and they d*** well *did* show that
I did not owe anything. She said she'd check it out and call right
back. About 30 min. later she called back and said that they *were*
dropping the attachment. I asked her to send me a letter that they
were dropping the attachment in case there was any hasstle with the
IRS. She said that she'd do that. No letter yet, but all this just
took place Friday.
Moral of story.....DOCUMENT, DOCUMENT......DOCUMENT.
fred();
|
| 186.2 | oops | CSC32::HADDOCK | SYS$CMGOD(); | Mon Dec 23 1991 09:06 | 6 |
|
Oh dear....I just noticed the personal names on the last two replies.
I changed mine to it's current setting a week or so ago as a joke.
No offense intended.
fred();
|
| 186.3 | Good luck Karen | TROOA::AKERMANIS | ԥ� | Mon Dec 23 1991 10:13 | 4 |
|
Like Fred's comment, sounds like fraud to me too.
John
|
| 186.4 | | RIPPLE::KENNEDY_KA | Trust God | Mon Dec 23 1991 11:48 | 3 |
| No offense taken Fred. :-)
Karen
|
| 186.5 | | MLCSSE::LANDRY | evitcepsrep ruoy egnahc | Tue Dec 31 1991 11:33 | 18 |
|
I don't know, but wouldn't he be defrauding your ex-mother-in-law? I
mean, does AFDC really care what happens to the cash once they give it
to him? I don't know, I'm genuinely asking here.
I do know, however, that if you weren't paying to AFDC, and you paid
directly to him, you'd have to have all your receipts to prove it. My
ex went through that routine, they threatened to throw him in jail so
he had to take all his receipts (cancelled checks) down to them and
show those fine Welfare folks.
I think it's your ex-mother-in-law who's been getting the shaft here.
Nice guy, I'm surprised I didn't marry him...
jean
|
| 186.6 | | RIPPLE::KENNEDY_KA | Trust God | Tue Dec 31 1991 13:12 | 14 |
| Jean,
You are right. I think the only time AFDC cares is when they are on
both welfare and working under the table and they get caught. All AFDC
really cares about is getting their money back, this is a real hot
button with me. If I had stayed on welfare, I could have gotten help
in getting my child support, when I had the child care, the high
doctors bills due to my son's ashtma, etc., etc. But since I chose to
be responsible and actually work for a living there was no help
forthcoming. Like I said this is a *real* hot button for me. My
ex-husband knows how to play everyone, from the system right on down.
And then points his finger and talks about how *HE* has been
victimized. Give me a break!
Karen
|