T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
183.1 | If you really want action, Call the Police! | IMOKAY::wagoner | | Mon Dec 02 1991 11:02 | 11 |
| Do your ex have custody? I have found that if you want something done fast
and want to make sure you catch him in the act. Call the police! They will
have a lot more clot with DSS than you call them directly. I had a room mate
that left her newborn in the house without telling he was there, I woke up
and felt someone else in the house and started looking. After a go around
with DSS I found that if I had called the police, they would have taken the
child and she would have had to fight to get him. This way it was my word
against hers.
-darryl
|
183.2 | not good | CSC32::HADDOCK | the final nightmare | Mon Dec 02 1991 11:08 | 21 |
| Terza,
Seven or even nine is too young to be leaving children unattended,
especially in charge of an infant. If some emergencry happens, the
children probably would not know what to do. You are correct.
You probably should call Social Services and ask to talk to someone
about Social Service's view about what is going on. Depends on what
your goal is here. Social Services will probably send someone out to
investigate if they think there is good cause to believe that this is
happening. They will lay down the law on the ex and tell them that this
is not a good thing to be doing. If Social Services does catch them in
the act SS will take the children into custody.
There was an incident in the ecommunity in which I live not long ago
where a woman left her children unattended in the car while she went
into the store. Someon saw the children and called SS. SS came and
took the chidren into custody and the woman went throught fourty-seven
levels of &^%$ getting them back.
fred();
|
183.3 | Thanks for the support! | TERZA::ZANE | for who you are | Mon Dec 02 1991 11:57 | 40 |
|
Hi Darryl, Fred,
Calling the police is very probably a good idea. I've not had good luck
with DSS in the past. They have three incidents of violence (by my ex
towards my son) on record (and none of those calls were made by me --
they were made by school and health officials) and they never did
anything but talk to my ex.
Well, actually, they did take Mark into protective custody when his arm
was broken in December 1989. They put him into my custody for all of
three days. They refused to put my daughter in my custody because "there
was no history or indication that any inappropriate behavior was
displayed toward her and she was not in any immediate danger." Since it
was my son's word against his father's, and they couldn't prove anything,
it was dropped. The good part (if anything good could be said about
this) is that he ceased any physical discipline against my children.
I know from previous experience with my ex, that half measures are
useless. That's why I haven't yet called DSS. I did call the school
counselor this morning, though. She's currently seeing Mark once a week
because of his aggressive behavior and dropping grades at school. (Mark
is currently enrolled in the Gifted and Talented program and probably
could be in the next grade, but he has social and emotional problems. I
wonder why??) The counselor hasn't called me back yet.
My son still soils his pants and engages in various other inappropriate
behaviors. He's nine years old! My ex just says that Mark is a complex
kid. Yow! I could probably go on and on about this.
I'm currently considering a strategy to "force" my ex into getting Mark
into professional counseling. I know that it's a family problem that
shows its symptoms through Mark, but my ex would never consider
counseling ("it's only for crazy people" he says), but at least Mark
could get help.
Terza
|
183.4 | grounds for change of custody??? | CSC32::HADDOCK | the final nightmare | Mon Dec 02 1991 12:54 | 11 |
| Terza,
If this is all in Colorado, one of the reasons that can be used for
a change of custondy is "impairment of emotional development". If
you son is indeed exibiting these behaviors, I'd say his emotional
development is indeed impaired. If you can document this and the
suspected physical abuse in court, hopefully along with "expert
withness" backup, I'd say your chances for getting a change of custody
would be pretty good.
fred();
|
183.5 | Counceling -- It would/could HELP ... | GIAMEM::DALRYMPLE | | Mon Dec 02 1991 12:56 | 22 |
| re:.3 (Terza)
In reference to your getting councelling for your son, I would
recommend doing just that,inspite of what the ex says. I approached my
ex back in February of 1989 because my son was having a hard time with
our break up. My EX said NO to me also, even after several attempts and
some kind talking on my part. Finally, I took the councelling issue
and two others to court. MY son started going to councilling soon after
and he still goes today. FWIW, I went also, and I'm not the one who
ended it all. Today, I deal with visitation denies, neglect, leaving my
son alone (2 sons- 9,6) etc. etc,. I pay my support, even though it's
more then I feel is right. I know it doesn't go to/for them... I pushed
the councelling all the way into court. It was court ordered (In
writing) and there is nothing (unless contempt) to prevent her.
I also have called DSS. I have gotten NO where with them. I have 4
cases of neglect and abuse on file with DSS. They did nothing then and
I don't think they will, (BUT, I will). When I have gone to the Police,
they tell me there's nothing they can do.
Good Luck..
Doug
|
183.6 | I have a bad feeling about this one | IMOKAY::wagoner | | Mon Dec 02 1991 12:58 | 11 |
| Does your son trust you? Do you trust him? If you could get him to call you
when he has been left alone then you could in turn call the police. There
is something big time going on with these kids. It sounds like more than
just being left alone. What state are they in? I really feel for you but
it sounds like that you may have the key to get something down. At least
there is something that you can prove. Maybe you should talk to your lawyer
and find out what he thinks you should do. It is so sad that by the time
that our great legal system will do anything to protect childred they have
been scared for life. They just got to be a better way.
-darryl
|
183.7 | | TERZA::ZANE | for who you are | Mon Dec 02 1991 13:40 | 35 |
|
Hoo boy. I have been down this path (or one just like it) before. I
have tried several times for custody only to give up in disgust and lack
of funds. I'm still paying my lawyer for the last time (when Mark's arm
was broken).
I know that I can address the *symptom* of leaving my children with the
baby. I can confront my ex on the phone and in writing and I can put
pressure on him through the school and DSS. He would never admit to
anything wrong or inappropriate, but he would yield to pressure or be
more clever at disguising it.
I don't believe this is enough. I would dearly love custody of our
children, with him having the same visitation that I've had. The
question is, is it worth the hassle it's going to take to get it done,
when I know there is absolutely no guarantee that I will accomplish
anything more than making an even bigger mess?
Is there really such a thing as emotional abuse in the eyes of the law?
And, will they do anything about it? What is my legal recourse, really?
It's not just me who has anything to lose, it's my children. They have
to live with him while mom is stirring up the hornets' nest.
I would really appreciate input.
Terza
P.S.-I think my ex secretly loves stuff like this. It makes him feel
important somehow. And I hate being the one to feed it.
|
183.8 | Where you stand | CSC32::HADDOCK | the final nightmare | Mon Dec 02 1991 14:20 | 24 |
| Terza,
In Colorado, custody can be changed for 3 reasons.
1) child has been living with you for > 6 mo. with the
cp's permission.
2) child is in physical danger.
3) The emotional developement of the child is impaired.
entry 62.21 lists those reasons and the judges comments in the
order to change custody for my daughter.
You have to really have your DOCUMENTATION together to *prove* any
of these. In my case, my daughter took the stand and fired a whole
salvo of torpedoes into her. Every time you know of the children
being left unattended CALL THE POLICE. Every time you see your
children, as discreetly as possible (and I'd not mention to the
children why because if it gets back to your ex, he'll be looking
out for it) check the chidren for physical marks that would indicate
physical abuse. If there are any marks that indicate abuse CALL THE
POLICE, and again--DOCUMENT, DOCUMEMT, DOCUMENT *EVERYTHING* that
happens for the possibility of that being evidence in court.
Whatever you do--don't give up.
fred();
|
183.9 | I know how you feel and agree!!!!! | IMOKAY::wagoner | | Mon Dec 02 1991 14:29 | 12 |
|
> Hoo boy. I have been down this path (or one just like it) before. I
> have tried several times for custody only to give up in disgust and lack
> of funds. I'm still paying my lawyer for the last time (when Mark's arm
> was broken).
I can relate to that. Everytime I even think about go for custody I want
to run and hide. I would try the police route first, but I think you should
be ready to seigh(sp) the chance if it happen.
Good luck!
-darryl
|
183.10 | check with teachers??? | CSC32::HADDOCK | the final nightmare | Mon Dec 02 1991 15:16 | 15 |
| Another thought.
Have you talked to your son's teacher. If your son has been
demonstrating any abnormal behavior in school, maybe the school
counselor would recommend psychiatric evaluation/counseling.
If your ex ignores their "recommendation" that could be one more
nail in his coffin (so to speak). If he does go to counseling,
if the counseling does turn up "empairment of emotional development",
(ie if your son is not emotionally and psycologically developed to his
age, and if he is still doing things like mess his pants, this is a good
bet) then the psychiatrist and his records can be sopenaed into court.
If not, then at least your ex will know that you are watching and may
not stop what he is doing but at least will think twice about it.
fred();
|
183.11 | | TERZA::ZANE | for who you are | Mon Dec 02 1991 15:28 | 24 |
|
Thank you for the information. I have been documenting and I will
continue to document anything I hear or observe.
That's an excellent suggestion about the teachers. In fact, it was my
son's teacher who asked me if it was all right for Mark to start seeing
the school counselor. Asking the counselor to recommend a professional
evaluation is a great idea.
It will be harder for my ex to fight "me" if it is initiated by an
outside agency such as a school or even DSS. Seriously, once I start
something like this, he will focus all his energy on me, his "sworn"
enemy, and the children will be "lost" again.
Terza
P.S.-A definite point in my favor is my experience with my ex's tactics.
He will make personal attacks at the first person to initiate any sort of
trouble. That won't work on me anymore.
Besides, he'll be digging his own grave on this one...
|
183.12 | | 24690::BEAN | Attila the Hun was a LIBERAL! | Mon Dec 02 1991 15:37 | 24 |
| RE: .11
Terza...
I really empathize with you... as do many in this conference. I'm glad
to hear you are documenting... Fred has probably pushed that single
point more than anyone else here, and still it can't be emphasized
enough. Even things which seem trivial can loom into larger proportion
when a judge or court sees it in its context.
I also know full well what you mean when you said your ex will take you
to task... as you are his sworn enemy.
My ex-wife feels that way about me (and to a lesser extent, I feel that
way about her, but since *I* don't have custody, it's impossible for me
to "use" the children against her, if I were so inclined). It's
tragic, what parents do to their children when they are embroiled in
battle with each other. They rationalize every move, every action, and
never, it seems, see the damage they are doing to the kids... just so
long as they can GET TO THE OTHER parent!
TAke care, Terza... do what is right. for you, and for your children.
tony
|
183.13 | a few thoughts about "loosing" | CSC32::HADDOCK | the final nightmare | Mon Dec 02 1991 16:09 | 15 |
|
I don't believe that you ever really *loose*. For years the only
thing that kept me going was the belief that "at least some day
my kids would know that I cared enought to keep trying". I guranantee
that that is the very least you can accomplish, and indeed someday
that will be a real biggie. The second least thing you will accomplish
is that the ex will know that you are watching. The first time I went
for change of custody I did not "win" but a bunch of the bs that she
was pulling ( like moving and changing the kid's school five times
in one year ) came to a screaching halt. Some of her behavior
didn't stop, but at least it slowed down. So hang in there. You
are not defeated until you quit trying. Then *both* you *and* the
kids truely loose.
fred();
|
183.14 | hope, gotta have hope | RIPPLE::KENNEDY_KA | Let Go for the Moment | Mon Dec 02 1991 17:37 | 10 |
| Fred,
You couldn't have said it better. Terza if the kids ever come back to
you and claim you didn't care, well, you will have all the
documentation to show them. It may feel like losing now, but I agree
with Fred in the long *you* will win.
Keep up the fight Terza and know that you have lots of people here who
are cheering you on.
Karen
|
183.15 | brief update | TERZA::ZANE | for who you are | Tue Dec 03 1991 10:15 | 38 |
|
Well, I have an appointment with the school counselor tomorrow.
I hadn't told her about Mark still soiling his pants, toilet seat, etc.
I hadn't told her because I felt ashamed about it and I hoped that the
things I tried in my home would help. Well, they haven't, not that I can
see, anyway. I was also afraid of Mark getting the permanent label of
"emotionally disturbed."
I did my best on my own. I have talked to his father about this
particular problem and his response was that it was my fault for not
reminding Mark to use the bathroom! Well, excuse me, there's no way I'm
going to tell a nine-year-old when to use the facilities. Mark is
clearly crying out for help by acting out this way. And I'm angry at his
father for suggesting that it's my fault for not directing each and every
motion of my son's life. Whoa, wait a minute here!
As you can tell, I have lots of mixed feelings about this.
But I will see her (the counselor) and lay everything on the table. Mark
(and I) need all the help we can get.
Thanks to eveyone who has replied. No, I can't give up hope and I won't
give up trying. But it's so d*m* hard along the way.
Thanks for your support! It truly means a lot!
Terza
P.S.-I'm also dealing with the fact that this morning my fiancee has told
me that he can't support me emotionally in going for custody. He is
unable (his words) to deal with Mark's problems. It hurts. I feel "all
by myself" again. I'm afraid this relationship may go the way I've seen
others in this conference go when it comes to doing the right thing for
your children (and ultimately, for yourself).
|
183.16 | hang tough--we're here | CSC32::HADDOCK | the final nightmare | Tue Dec 03 1991 11:30 | 25 |
| Terza,
You're not alone. I know what you are going through. It's very
difficult emotionally to keep up the fight when you're the parent.
Let alone when you're a third prarty to the conflict. You may
have to lean on us more for support and leave the fiance out of
it as much as possible. You can also take hope and strength in
that you *know* that what you are doing is right. Even though
you are separated from your chidren physically and probably legally,
they are and always will be your children. Love isn't always expressed
in physical contact. One of the main things that kept me going was
knowing that *I* was really the only hope my son had of not ending up
in a mental institution or prision by the time he was 20. It's still
debateable whether or not I succeeded, but he can never accuse me of
not trying. There was a thing in Reader's Digest about the speed of
sound being awfully slow because some of the things you say to your
kids when they're teanagers doesn't get to them until they are in
their fourties. But if you don't say it. If you don't try. It will
*never* get to them. If they don't understand or even know how much
you love them now, someday they will. The fiance too must understand
that your chidren *must* come first. If he can't, then maybe it's
you that must re-evaluate the relationship. You *cannot* be forced
to make a choice between your chidren and someone else.
fred();
|
183.17 | 'scuse me... | CECV03::BEAN | Attila the Hun was a LIBERAL! | Wed Dec 04 1991 10:21 | 36 |
| re: <<< NOTE 183.16 BY CSC32::HADDOCK "THE FINAL NIGHTMARE" >>>
-< HANG TOUGH--WE'RE HERE >-
<...... FIANCE TOO MUST UNDERSTAND
< THAT YOUR CHIDREN *MUST* COME FIRST. IF HE CAN'T, THEN MAYBE IT'S
< YOU THAT MUST RE-EVALUATE THE RELATIONSHIP. YOU *CANNOT* BE FORCED
< TO MAKE A CHOICE BETWEEN YOUR CHIDREN AND SOMEONE ELSE.
I may be being "picky" with what you say here Fred... it's very seldom
I disagree with you... but I do here.
I don't feel the *MUST* come first in the sense I believe you mean
here. Yes, the FIANCE *must* be willing to accept the fact that the
children and NCP (Terza, here, but, it could be anyone) are a PACKAGE,
and should not be separated... and if the fiance insists on just one
part of the package, then there is a real problem... The part I
disagree with is that CHILDREN COMING FIRST STATEMENT.
If my children CAME FIRST, I'd still be married to my ex, and still
live with them. But, there came a time when I had to put ME first and
decided that for my own health, sanity, and even the long-term health
(emotional) of my children, I had to leave. I believe we nearly all
make that very difficult decision at some time.
Additionally, if my children CAME FIRST, I'd not have re-married. The
fact that I am remarried is a tremendous burden to my younger children,
my ex sees to that...
So, if we are honest (I think), we put *ourselves, and our new spouses*
ahead of our children... and that's exactly why we have such a
difficult time with the separation from them... tremendous guilt for
being "selfish", "inconsiderate of them", is heaped on us by those same
children, by society, and especially by the ex's.
tony
|
183.18 | I think both Tony and Fred both feel strongly abouth their children. | TERZA::ZANE | for who you are | Wed Dec 04 1991 10:48 | 36 |
|
I understand where both Tony and Fred are coming from (I think).
It's not so much that my children come first or second or whatever, it is
that they are a major part of my life and if my fiancee wants to be in a
relationship, he has to accept that part of my life much as he has to
accept anything else (like: I'm short, I love to read, I love the
outdoors, I hate intolerance, I'm in debt, etc.) Note that he doesn't
have to like any of those parts to accept me et al, but it would help.
He hasn't put me in the position of choosing between him and my children.
He wouldn't (consciously) do that. AND, he has indicated that he can't
emotionally support my drive for custody although he strongly feels that
something must be done. He's not for me with respect to my kids, (which
is a problem for me), but he's not against me, either. He has some
things he has to work out.
---------------------------------
I meet with the school counselor at 12:30 today. I also mail my ex a
letter stating what will happen if Mark soils again. I am nervous about
these things. I know that I am deliberately stirring things up. I hate
to have to work this way when there are other, healthier ways to go about
it (but I've already tried those).
I feel very supported by the members of this conference. I've received
mail, I've read the replies in here and I even got a phone call today.
It's somewhat overwhelming that so many people care.
Thanks to all of you!
Terza
|
183.19 | probably don't disagree that much | CSC32::HADDOCK | the final nightmare | Wed Dec 04 1991 10:49 | 14 |
| Tony,
Let me be a little more specific. If the new SO tries to put you
in a position of choosing between them and abandoning your children
to whatever fate may be, then the decision ( to me at least )
is quite clear. They have to realize that this is a package deal
and that a good part of your energy may be taken up with dealing
with the bs surrounding the children. Even though you are not there
physically, and may have been stripped of all legal right as a
parent. You can never be stripped of the *fact* that you are the
parent and can still try to do whaever you can to make sure the
chidren are being properly cared for.
fred();
|
183.20 | understood | CECV03::BEAN | Attila the Hun was a LIBERAL! | Thu Dec 05 1991 09:18 | 1 |
|
|
183.21 | Please try to keep the kids out of the middle | DANALI::JIMC | Knight of the Woeful Countenance | Fri Dec 06 1991 07:51 | 37 |
| First off, I will post an update (soon) in my note 110.
Terza (and others),
It is my feeling that if your SO cannot support you in your parental
role, then your SO is not accepting and participating in your life to
the degree which I believe a partner should. You should be able to get
more support and encouragement from your SO than from friends. In your
case, as in mine, this is not happening. What I believe it leads to is
growing resentment on both sides with the eventual breakdown of the
relationship. I would rather try to salvage the friendship and let the
love go than end up hating.
RE: leaving the baby with the 7 & 9 year old children -- This hits me
on several different levels. The first episode of corporal punishment
I remember is associated with just such an event. I was between 4 & 5
years old and had been left to care for my brother (3 1/2) and sister
(2). Looking back on the circumstances, I made correct decisions. I
still got the hell beat out of me for it. (but what does this have to
do with your situation?) Well, it is my opinion that it is dangerous
to the infant and abusive of the older child(ren) to require such
service at such an age. It is also child abuse and neglect according
to the laws of most states that I know about.
All the good advice has been given. Call the police if you know it is
happening. DO NOT have your children participate in your actions (such
as by having them call you when it happens) because it will put them in
the middle and that is abusive (whatta Catch-22 8-). Involve the
school, the police, DSS (and keep after them as politely as possible),
and anyone else who can exert an influence for the betterment of your
children. DOCUMENT everything. If the police get involved, get a copy
of their logs sheets and any reports they file (do it soon after each
incident or it might get lost).
Good luck and megahugs
80)
jimc
|
183.22 | | ROYALT::BOUCHER | Hugs are free and easy to give! | Fri Dec 06 1991 08:21 | 20 |
| Terza,
I'm sorry you're going through so much...
As the so of a parent trying to get custody of his children, I find
your so's attitude really difficult to swallow. When you get involved
with someone that has children, whether they have physical custody or
visitation rights, its a package deal. If you can't handle that - then
you don't develop the relationship.
Sure, it would be alot easier for me to not take on 3 children who've
been through emotional hell. But they are his children, a part of his
life and I love him. I am an adult - I can deal with the problems that
arise - I have choices. It is inconceivable for me to ask him not to
try for custody of those kids. I'm right there in the middle of this,
by his side, working to get those children into our lives.
Opps mgrs here gotta go.
Joyce
|
183.23 | Very good point JimC | STEREO::WAGONER | | Fri Dec 06 1991 11:28 | 12 |
| Re: JIMC
Your are a 100% right about not getting the kids in the middle. I
just get so burn when I hear about these things happening to kids
that I didn't really think. Thanks you for setting me staight.
Tersz,
All our hopes are with you.
-darryl
|