Title: | Welcome to the Non-Custodial Parents Conference |
Notice: | Please read 1.* before writing anything |
Moderator: | MIASYS::HETRICK |
Created: | Sun Feb 25 1990 |
Last Modified: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Number of topics: | 420 |
Total number of notes: | 4370 |
Should I get a lawyer? If you read my earlier note you know some of this already. I was divorced in 1975. I have a 16 year old daughter that my ex had custody of. Last March the 16 year old (then 15) left my ex wife's house under duress of her step father. For a couple of months she lived with my other daughter Chrissy (age 22 and married) but that caused a lot of problems so I helped her get her own place. This all happened in California, I live in Colorado. All during this time I wanted Lisa to come live with me but until last month she said no. Last month she decided to come live with me. Yesterday she told me she had never felt so good in her entire life. For the last four years I have had my check garnished for support and arrears to the tune of $300/month. I talked with my ex-wife when Lisa told me that she was not getting any money from her. She basically said that Lisa owed it to her for raising her. She said she thought that Lisa and I deserved each other and did not dispute me having custody of her. I told her I would continue to pay her arrears if she would sign a notorized letter giving me physical custody of Lisa. I needed this letter for them to change my garnishment. She said she would sign on the condition that I didn't hire a lawyer. I wrote up the letter and sent it to her. That was a month ago. When I've called her about it she always has an excuse. The DA (Child Support Division) says she will submit for change of garnishment if I show her that Lisa is enrolled in High School here. I asked her what she would do about the money my ex has taken over the last six months and not given to Lisa. She basically said that was not her problem. When she files all the papers and IF the judge decides that it OK they will reduce the amount the take from my check each month. Until then . . . I also asked the DA if they would handle it if I petitioned for child support from my ex. She said they would but that my ex had declared that she is not employed and her husband is not employed. (I know that my ex is self employed and has anywhere from 6 to 10 geriatric patients living with her. She charges them $1,000/month/patient. My daughter Lisa used to bathe them etc.) The DA basically said I would have to prove this. I asked her if I told her I had no income would she believe me. She would not reply to that one. So should I hire a lawyer. It would have to be a California lawyer since that was where the original order was filed. Any ideas on how much this would cost? The custody part of it seems irrelevant since Lisa was basically an abandoned child because her mother threw her out and sent her no money for six months. (California law) Thanks, Patrick dtn 592-4449
T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
150.1 | yes | CSC32::HADDOCK | All Irk and No Pay | Wed Aug 21 1991 15:48 | 24 |
Pat, You'll probably have to get a lawyer to get this straightened out. Not nice $$$ wise, but cheaper in the long run. You should at least be able to offset what you owe her from what she will be ordered to pay you. The court usually requires a tax return as part of the financial documentation of change-of-child-support. May have a P.I. check out the house (more bucks, but...). Your ex whould have to explain to the court as to why she is no longer caring for these people if she isn't, or URESA (Uniform Recipocol Support Act) says that she is "voluntarily underemployed" and the support will be based on her "potential income". If her tax return says no income, turn her in to the IRS. A lawyer told me that the court would probably count her income "at least at minimum wage". At least you should get an adjustment on *your* support order. The support order remains in effect until the court changes it in most cases. So until you get the court to chang the order, you still have to keep paying *her* support. fred(); | |||||
150.2 | CECV03::BEAN | Attila the Hun was a LIBERAL! | Thu Aug 22 1991 16:04 | 4 | |
put this on the list of reasons for WHY *NOT* to have your wages garnished! t. | |||||
150.3 | Maybe you don't need a CA lawyer | BENONI::JIMC | Knight of the Woeful Countenance | Tue Aug 27 1991 15:56 | 9 |
Check it out in Colorado first. Since your daughter has not lived with her mother for 6 months, you should be able to get a change of jurisdiction and file for support under URESA. You may be in a better position than you think. The one negative is that, to the best of my knowledge, they will not make any changes retroactive, but hey, it doesn't hurt to ask. my 0.02 jimc | |||||
150.4 | Stop writing the blank check | CSC32::HADDOCK | Don't Tell My Achy-Breaky Back | Mon Mar 07 1994 07:47 | 10 |
Paul Harvy this a.m. reports that more and more people are less and less willing to pay a lawyer $100+/hour for limitless hours for divorce proceedings and minor legal matters. They are doing it themselves. Particularly in Phoenix, Az. where up to 80% are opting to do without the lawyers. Way to go people! Not for divorce, but for sending the message. fred(); |