T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
117.1 | | DPDMAI::MCQUEENEY | Oh yeah??? Secure THIS!!! | Tue Mar 12 1991 12:41 | 26 |
|
re: .last
Can she attach his wages? Most certainly. Nowadays the judges will
attach the wages if the woman even suspects there may be a problem. If
there has been any arrearage in the past, you can be sure the judge
will find in her favour.
Can she expect him to pay the child's medical expenses? Surely.
That's pretty much a standard nowadays. I know I'm required to carry
my ex-wife and kids on my Digital insurance, and pay anything not
covered, even over and above the weekly support.
Being from out of state, she doesn't need to appear, just to send a
representative to argue her case. It's better if she's present, bbut a
judge will take into consideration the distance problem.
re: not paying support while child is visiting - I doubt it will work.
The judges assume the custodial parent still has financial obligations
to insure the permanent home for the dependent child. I'd bet the
custodial parent will have to agree to this, and voluntarily send the
support checks back. I wish him a lot of luck on this one, but don't
hold your breath.
McQ
|
117.2 | | ICS::STRIFE | | Wed Mar 13 1991 17:54 | 3 |
| Do you know if she filedfor a Uniform Reciprocal Agreement through the
NY courts? In tha case, she would not have to show or be represented
in the matter here.
|
117.3 | legal questions | LUNER::MACKINNON | | Thu Mar 14 1991 07:26 | 27 |
|
Polly,
I know that on the documentation that came with his summons to appear
in court that everything was filed with the Family Court of NY.
So if this is what you stated, then she does not have to show or
even be represented. I do not understand this. How could this
issue be resolved with the judge only hearing from one side at
a time? Doesnt seem like it would accomplish anything.
But then again, how can she refute what he is saying in court if
she is not there or a representative of hers is not there? He can
refute her charges with copies of cancelled checks.
Is this something she can do in future situations? Can this be
done with respect to custody and visitation as well or is it only
in the case of child support?
Also, the child was born in Mass. I was under the impression that
all of the legal proceedings must take place in Mass courts. How is
it that she can start legal proceedings in the NY courts or through
the NY courts?
Michele
|
117.4 | from colorado. | CSC32::HADDOCK | All Irk and No Pay | Thu Mar 14 1991 17:50 | 12 |
| re -1 Michele
You've hit on what is another of the lop-sided features of
child-support/custody-visitation.
It has been my experience that you can be hauled into court for child
support *whenever* there is a "change in circumstance". Visitation
can be modified whenever, but a request for change of custody can only
be requested once every two years unless there are some *very*
extinuating circumstances.
fred();
|
117.5 | agreed | LUNER::MACKINNON | | Fri Mar 15 1991 07:27 | 19 |
|
Fred,
Agreed!!! However, John's lawyer seems to think that in this case
all of this will be lumped into one court date. This is partly due
to the fact that she will have to be present for the court date to
discuss the custody/visitation modifications. I still think that
this will most likely not happen, but who knows we may get lucky.
Also, the child support garbage is with the Malden court and the
other stuff was filed with the court in Boston.
I am wondering though if there is any way she can have all of
this transferred to the NY state courts as that is where the
child has been residing for the past year plus. Can this
take place? Or does the entire matter still have to be played
out in the Mass state courts due to the fact that this is the
original birth place of the child?
Michele
|
117.6 | here or there? | BENONI::JIMC | illegitimi non insectus | Mon Mar 18 1991 10:53 | 5 |
| According to my understanding of the jurisdiction issue, after the
child has resided in a new state for over six months, jurisdiction can
be moved (and usually is moved) to that state. If the original
agreement was settled in Mass. then the Mass courts "can" be used
unless she has filed for a change.
|
117.7 | Not hard and fast | CSC32::HADDOCK | All Irk and No Pay | Mon Mar 18 1991 15:06 | 7 |
| re.5. Juisdiction
I think this one may depend more on the Judge and how good your
lawyer is. My Ex tried twice to get jurisdiction transferred to
Minnesota. She was unsuccessful both times (thank God).
fred();
|
117.8 | we did good | LUNER::MACKINNON | | Wed Mar 20 1991 07:12 | 28 |
|
Well yesterday we went into court. Things went very very well.
The judge did not attach his wages because John told him that he
has been paying her each week the regular amount plus extra to
cover the arrears. The amount of arrears was argued about, but
was reduced a bit down to what he thought he owed her vs what she
had submitted to the court.
Also, she requested he pay for her uninsured medical costs which was
denied by the DOR person and lawyer due to the fact that it was
never paid for by John previously. So all in all he did very well.
The only thing that has changed is that he will be making the checks
out to DOR instead of her. All of the checks will be processed
through DOR.
He also told the judge that he is routinely denied visitation and the
judge asked him why he was waiting to do something about it. So
tonight he meets with his lawyer to file the necessary documents
with the court Thursday and have her served with papers on friday.
The judge said that if she was indeed violating the temporary agreement
that he should be allowed full custody of Erin. The problem is that
this judge is in Malden and his case is in Boston. But things look
promising.
Just wanted to let everyone know how we did.
Michele
|
117.9 | | AIMHI::RAUH | Home of The Cruel Spa | Wed Mar 20 1991 11:55 | 9 |
| Michele,
Careful of DOR. These folks get credit as sales people would for
all the dollars they collect through their org. The problem comes when
you have lost a job and the wheels grind on and they will toss you into
prison for non payment. Alis Detors Prision. Something that was done
away with I thought!
George
|
117.10 | Round one to the good guys | CSC32::HADDOCK | All Irk and No Pay | Wed Mar 20 1991 13:52 | 9 |
| re .8 Michelle
Congrats!! Hang in there. One positive point about paying the
"support" through the DOR is that there is *definate* record of
what's been paid and thay can't come hastle you for non payment
when you have already paid. Hope things continue to go will
for you, John and especially Erin.
fred();
|
117.11 | | AIMHI::RAUH | Home of The Cruel Spa | Wed Mar 20 1991 16:26 | 1 |
| Ditto! Good luck. Sorry to sound negi on .9!
|
117.12 | beware mass. agency | FSTTOO::BEAN | Attila the Hun was a LIBERAL! | Wed Mar 20 1991 16:37 | 11 |
| RE: PAYING THRU DOR
Just this past summer, the DOR ran out of money (Mass. is BROKE,
remember) and THEY said they could not afford to buy STAMPS and as a
result they SAT ON SUPPORT PAYMENTS THEY HAD RECEIVED and did not
forward them to the custodial parents for several days!!!!
I've never heard of this problem in any other state, but, it sure did
happen here!
tony
|
117.14 | | AIMHI::RAUH | Home of The Cruel Spa | Wed Mar 20 1991 16:51 | 2 |
| The man whose child has $60K in the bank is recieving her child support
checks still!!!
|
117.15 | they dont put you in jail | SPARKL::SANTOS | | Wed Oct 09 1991 13:52 | 11 |
| .9
Sorry but I have to disagree with if you dont pay they put you in jail.
My X is 3 weeks in the arrears and was 2 weeks in the arrears even
after they started attaching his pay. All you have to do is move from
job to job every two months and you dont have to pay. He also owes me
for one and a half years from before and they are not doing anything
about it.
Della
|
117.16 | The do so put you in jail if your a bad dad! | AIMHI::RAUH | Home of The Cruel Spa | Wed Oct 09 1991 15:33 | 33 |
| Della,
If he owes yha, you can prove it. Take him to court. I have seen
many a man go to the pokie for not paying. Some even falsely accused of
not paying. There are "Dead Beat Dads" programs, no "Dead Beat Moms".
There are women suport groups that many NCP men do not have if they are
in trouble.
My thoughts, if he is a dead beat. Get proof, ON PAPER only. As in
do your homework. March into your local DOR, and have him arrested for
not paying. If he is a migrant man, get a 1040 report that he fills
out from the IRS via interog's. Or supina the stuff. Cost money to go
after him? Either hang around some of the fathers suport groups like I
am with or get in with your womans networking and go for it.
I have a brother-out-law, no I am not realated to the fool anymore,
who is doing the same thing. His ex is bouncing on his brains with
taking him back every time game. As in, he doesn't pay, drag him in,
he still doesn't pay, drag him back in. After a couple of times like
this the judge/marrital master gets miffed at the fool. Then things
start happening to him that he wished he had never thought ever would.
Case in point, the lad in question was taken to the big house for a
couple of days. Got his hearing, got a lawyer, shows up and the judges
throws him back for he got a lawyer and if he has a lawyer how come
he cannot pay you? This went of for a couple of months, the lad is
paying like a good boy, was one of those dads that dropped in to see
the kids when he felt good a ready. Weeeelll! He is the best daddy I
have ever seen! He has seen the light, got a job, picks up the kids,
takes them places and such. And is a respected man agian.
Even got his substance abuse corrected. AMAZING AINT IT!:)))
|
117.17 | | SRATGA::SCARBERRY_CI | | Wed Oct 09 1991 16:52 | 23 |
| re.16 last paragraph
glad to hear it. My ex was the same way. After the divorce, he
purposely quit jobs, moved around in order to avoid paying child
support. He was pissed at me, so this was his revenge, as I'm sure
are others.
Anyway, 4+/- years later, we have a brief encounter, he sees the
kids, wishes us all well and from then on, sends us some child support
every single week. By this time, he had gotten over the divorce
and I guess he admitted his responsibility, I really don't know.
Without going into detail, the best thing the CPs can do, I guess
is keep pursuing inn court. Takes a long time. I've filed before.
It worked until I moved out of the state. Then I filed again in
the new state, 'cause he quit paying, but the state never found
him. This state has too large a case load. I didn't want to spend
the bucks to do it privately and since then, everything in our
lives has changed anyway.
I guess when these kids, that get the raw deal, reach 18, they can
go for those back payments then. It'll come in handy then too.
If in fact, these parents have any money then.
|
117.18 | But where were you when... | LJOHUB::GODIN | | Thu Oct 10 1991 07:22 | 8 |
| Based on some of the comments here and personal experience, I'd guess
that getting help from the DOR, district attorney, court, state, or any
other official entity varies from state to state. It might be more
helpful if people recounting their experiences would identify where
they are located.
Thanks.
Karen
|
117.19 | | AIMHI::RAUH | Home of The Cruel Spa | Thu Oct 10 1991 08:14 | 25 |
| re .17
The thing that an non paying NCP doesn't realise is that a child is an
adult more of his life than he is a minor child. Hence, if the non
paying NCP doesn't pay, doesn't see their offspring, there is a good
chance that they will miss out not only on the growing up part, but the
fact that there is a bonding of aduld child and parent that they will
miss out on for the rest of thier lives.
On other thing to bring up. I have been writing in the mens notes in
reguards to the horra's of the courts. A man in the note that
has custody of his daughter, after a long battle over custody in
courts, was not getting child suport from the dead beat mother.
She was taking vacations to Arizona from New England, she was taking
karata lessons, got a new set of threads/cloths, contacts, etc.
But cannot pay child suport, help with buying the daughter cloths(?),
cannot help pay for her eye glasses(?), and quit a $40,000 a year
job(!) because she wanted a life change(!)...... WEll she has to
now pay $44 per week, and has to pay for her own attorny bills.
This woman had three children by three different
marriages/relationships. When mom threw out our man, he slept in a
cellar, then got thrown out of there. Was able to work a second job,
got a little ahead to rent a room, then got back on his feet. While
still paying child suport/alimony to his ex (mom)..... Sounds wild�
Sounds like this is a good piece of fiction? Gotta tell yha! I isnt!
|
117.20 | | SRATGA::SCARBERRY_CI | | Thu Oct 10 1991 12:24 | 26 |
| re.19 first paragraph
You can say that again. My own parents split when I was 9. I have
3 younger sisters. We never saw Dad, or his support in any way,
until 17 years later. Well, it was too late to reestablish any
sort of connection for us. I'll never understand him, even though
I do love him in some sort of way, but I lack respect for this man
to this day.
I did learn something from this though. With my own children, after
my divorce, although their dad lost visitation priviledges based
on things that I'll not mention, I knew that after our kids reached
an elementary school age, they'd be contact with their dad in some
way. I'd have called their dad, which I did 5 yrs. after our divorce.
The story since then has been good, and I've learned that a simple
talk can do so much.
I never "brainwashed" our kids. I never needed their support in
siding with me. We spoke of their dad whenever they brought it
up. I didn't want them to experience what I had nor did I want
their father to loose the precious persons he helped bring into
this world so willingly. So far, we've been just lucky.
But going back to NCPs, as an adult now, I wonder how my dad could
just off and not worry how we were getting along. I could have
needed him.
|