T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
80.1 | no stats, but some words to pass along | CSC32::K_JACKSON | Hedonist for hire-no job too easy | Tue Aug 14 1990 10:54 | 35 |
|
Theo,
I haven't seen any statistic's for quite some time but if someone
does, I would like to see them post them here.
$550/month sounds like alot but it depends on where you will be
residing in the U.S. Every state has different views on how much
a child should be granted for support. Some states have a flat
rate which is determined no matter what the custodial parent makes
and other states take into consideration what the custodial parent
does make. Other factors involved are if children need special
tutoring, needs, etc.
It will be great if you and your soon-to-be-ex can work something out
together, mainly to keep harmony amongst yourselves and your child.
Past history from various sources dictates that you could eventually
run into some disasters along the way in which all parties concerned
will have to deal with.
To pass along some words of wisdom, when you return to the states
things can change dramatically for everyone. You will fall into
different categories but still have to abide by you Swiss divorce.
Depending on your salary, you could wind up paying more or less
in support. If she is not working when she returns she could pop
for alimony.
As mentioned by various participants in this conference, it's a
strange world when it comes to this subject and dealing with it.
It's one of the most sensitive issues going on in today's society!!
Good luck and God Bless...
Kenn
|
80.2 | a few thoughts | CSC32::HADDOCK | All Irk and No Pay | Tue Aug 14 1990 11:13 | 23 |
| Many states in the U.S. are going to a set schedule based on the income
of both parties. Roughly the formula works something like
Standard_of_living_for_child_from_schedule *
(total_salary - their_salary)/your_salary {the reatio of your salary}
$550/month/child sounds like a bit much to me, but it depends on your
salary.
In most states (I don't know about *all*) you can get child support
modified if you circumstances change. I don't know if U.S. has a
reciprocal support agreement with Switzerland or not. It could be
that she can't *force* you to pay anything if you return to U.S.,
but you'd probably be in a heep of trouble if you ever returned to
Switzerland. Not that I'm recommending that's what you do, of course,
but it could be a negotiating point.
I also don't know what custody/visitation agreements the U.S. has
witn Switzerland. It may also become *very* difficult to
*enforce* you visitation rights. Not trying to scare you, but it's
something you should check into.
fred();
|
80.3 | | FSTVAX::BEAN | Attila the Hun was a LIBERAL! | Tue Aug 14 1990 11:35 | 22 |
| Theo...
I wonder if there is any consistency accross the U.S. in determining
the amount a NCP should pay for child support.
My divorce decree is from Texas, which uses a formula based on your
"net earnings" to determine child support payments. My payments for
one child would be $480 per month. I am quite sure the "cost of
raising a child" in Texas is considerably less than most areas,
especially California. I say the payment "would be" because my divorce
decree specifically spells out the dollar amount. At the present time,
I am paying support for three children (ages 12 to 19), and the amount
deminishes as the children grow out of support criteria. The point I
am trying to make (none to clearly, I'm afraid) is that I strongly
recommend that you try to get the actual dollar amounts specified in
the decree. Avoid referencing any formula to determine support, unless
you know your personal income will go down. By having the actual
amounts specified, in dollars and cents, for each child, and by
accurately and completely describing the conditions and ages under
which support is paid by you, you will eliminate the CP coming back at
you for more money (or reduce the likelyhood).
tony
|
80.4 | $550 isn't too high, depending on salaries | DEC25::BERRY | UNDER-ACHIEVER and PROUD of it, MAN! | Wed Aug 15 1990 03:38 | 7 |
| For us, the full figure reached over $600. (Colorado Springs)
Don't forget, support is 'assumed' to be split by both, although only
one pays a set amount, the NCP. So at $600, the NCP would be paying
about $300 per month.
-dwight
|
80.5 | <some more questions> | 49282::LANGTON | Theo Langton @GEO | Wed Aug 15 1990 10:58 | 50 |
| Thanks Kenn, Fred() (what does the "()" stand for?), Tony & dwight
for your help and support. It's great to have some experienced folks
around, although I wouldn't wish these experiences on anyone.
A few comments/questions:
Do you know where I can get a copy of such a "schedule" plus an
example of one of those formulas of the form (total cost of raising)
* (total cost - their salary)/your salary you mentioned? I'd like
to play with one. Since I can't foresee what will happen to my salary
and "lifestyle", I need to make sure my payments can fluctuate.
Tony I'm also inclined towards your advice of being very explicit
in the dollar amounts and ages to avoid misunderstandings, future
court actions etc. It's clear in my case if there are future court
actions, I'll be on the short end of the stick, since they'll happen
in Switzerland and I'll be "in absentia". Plus, if she decides to
withhold my son for whatever reason from seeing me, I'll have a
hell of a time enforcing my visitation rights. There's a kind of
tension between wanting to have an "open-ended" agreement that allows
for change, and wanting the security of a detailed and specific
contract.
In my case, I thought seriously of coming clandestinely to the US
with my son, re-establishing residence, asking for a divorce on
US terms and going for custody. I think I'd have a good chance too.
The trouble is, Switzerland would never recognize the decision,
so I'd have to keep my son away from his mother and be in constant
surveillance for when she'd "steal" him back. That's not the kind
of life I want to live, even if I want to be with my son and am angry
at my soon-to-be-ex. Not very positive for anyone concerned.
So I'm sticking it out, trying to avoid battles in court, since they
will award her everything (Switzerland=the middle ages). It's been
helpful to go through mediation with her family involved. Luckily,
they sympathize and think my wife has made a big mistake taking off.
So I encourage anyone in a similar situation to try to involve
respected third parties to mediate!
Anyway, final question: does anyone have pointers to the potential
US/Swiss "mutual visitation enforcement"-type agreements you mentioned?
How can I find out if there are any? Also, my wife is both swiss
and american (as is my son). How can I find out if she they would
be held to the decisions of an american court and if there is any
way that an american court to take precedence even in the eyes of
a swiss court?
Whew, what a load of issues...
Theo
|
80.6 | | FSTTOO::BEAN | Attila the Hun was a LIBERAL! | Wed Aug 15 1990 11:12 | 25 |
| Theo...
Yours is perhaps the most complex of all the NCP issues I've seen
discussed.
I could answer some of your questions (re: formulae for computing child
support liability,) but only as they pertain to Texas. I doubt that
they would be anywhere near the same as in Switzerland. In fact, I
suspect the Swiss laws would be more stringent than any here in the
U.S.
I strongly support your decision not to covertly bring your child here.
My daughter lives in Germany. Her children were born there. According
to the offices of the U.S. State Department of Immigration, the U.S.
does not recognize dual citizenship. That means, that in the U.S.'s
eyes, your wife and kids are U.S. citizens only. I imagine that also
infers that they would recognize and enforce only U.S. laws regarding
divorce and suupport issues. I may be wrong.
I know Switzerland recognizes dual citizenship. I have NO idea how
they would view U.S. court rulings regarding divorce/support.
WIsh I could be of more help...
tony
|
80.7 | a few | CSC32::HADDOCK | All Irk and No Pay | Wed Aug 15 1990 11:27 | 15 |
| re .5
Yea, the schedules and formulas are nearly all a bit different from
state to state and will likely not have any bearing on what goes on
in Switzerland. The Colorado formula is spelled out in CRS (Colorado
Revised Statutes) 14-10-115, but I doubt if you will be able to find
a copy of those real handy in Switzerland. For questions about
reciprosity, you'll probably have to check with a lawyer familiar
with international law. Check to see if there is anything like a
Legal Referral Service there. In the U.S. the referral service will
be listed in the yellow pages with the lawyers. Maybe if there is
something like the Bar Association there.
fred();-- C function, takes no input, does nothing, returns nothing
;^).
|
80.8 | Dollars or Francs ?? | LOEDGE::FARRELL | I'm so INCKREDIBLE, it's a-maze to me !!! | Wed Aug 15 1990 14:42 | 21 |
|
One point to consider when deciding on the amount is whether
it will be paid in a fixed number of Dollars or Swiss Francs.
I'm currently sending money to Ireland, when I started
last year the rate was $1.5 to one Irish pound, since then
the dollar has slipped SIGNIFICANTLY to $1.72 last week
against the IR pound (it's really hovering around $1.65,
last week was probably due to Iraq!!). We don't have
a fully feldged divorce in place, working on one like
this is complicated, but I'm hoping to get agreement
on a fixed dollar rate, while my ex wants a fixed
Irish pound rate.
One of those things where you could end up in trouble.
Good luck, international divorces like this are
MESSY !!
Bernard.
|
80.9 | Mutual agreement recognized in CH | GVA01::LANGTON | Theo Langton @GEO | Thu Aug 16 1990 03:14 | 33 |
| Again, thanks everyone for your help!
Regarding my request for examples of the "schedules and formulas"
mentioned, I realize Swiss law wouldn't recognize a Texan or Coloradan
formula, but the reason I asked is that I want to make up my own.
While swiss law has a set formula for child support of it's own,
(10-15% of current salary, indexed to inflation and also increased
by set amounts every five years) a judge will also
recognize and "bless" *any* formula backed up by the two parents.
So my best hope is to come up with my own and to get agreement on
it. This will allow me to bring things in like "fixed exchange rate",
etc. (Thanks for the hint!) I also want to include things which
would normally be ignored, like the 2-3 plane tickets I'll have
to pay each year. Overall, the idea is that as long as I'm making
a bundle, it's OK to pay, but if my circumstances change, I want
to establish a certain minimum which will always be respected. THAT's
the hard part! (My ex said: "Just get child support insurance,
so if ever you can't pay, the checks will still come in." Anybody
ever heard of this?)
Another alternative I'd like to look at is: I pay a certain minimum
every month. And as long as I'm earning well, I also agree to pay
$x above that into a special fund invested for his college or later use.
Anyone ever seen an agreement like this?
Once I can work with my ex to an agreement on these things, I suppose
I'll be qualified to negotiate simple matters like the release
of Iraqi hostages, and pullout from Kuwait!
Cheers,
Theo
|
80.10 | get it done now | CSC32::HADDOCK | All Irk and No Pay | Thu Aug 16 1990 10:10 | 14 |
| 1) In Colorado at least you'd probably end up paying more thatn 10-15%.
2) I've never heard of Child Support Insurnance. Interesting idea,
but with all the problems in the U.S. aroung support, I'd think
it would cost big $$$$. Something *many* non-custodial parents
find in short supply. You may try using this as a negotiating point.
3) It looks like you're doing the right thing with trying to get these
questions settled *now*. You'll probably be definately at the
disadvantage if you try to get it changed later. I don't know
how Switzerland is about reciprosity, but I know Canada will
enforce child suppport, but won't enforce visitation rights.
fred();
|
80.11 | | SQM::MACDONALD | | Thu Aug 30 1990 09:11 | 16 |
|
Theo,
The laws here vary, but in general you can expect a court to
require you to pay what you can afford to pay particularly if
your income is above average.
Your type of situation is probably relatively rare among U.S.
divorces in general. I'd suggest that whether or not your
divorce is processed in a Swiss court that you also get some
guidance from a U.S. lawyer who has handled something like this
before. You may that way be able to influence the final decree
in Switzerland in a way that will make life easier for you when
you relocate back here.
Steve
|
80.12 | thanks steve | GVA01::LANGTON | Theo Langton @GEO | Mon Sep 24 1990 04:20 | 5 |
| Thanks Steve. Seems like a good idea. Guess I better get on the ol
phone again...
Theo
|