T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
50.1 | is this the whole story? | FSTTOO::BEAN | Attila the Hun was a LIBERAL! | Mon Apr 30 1990 15:54 | 24 |
| you said "on several occasions...you called..." and "you were pis&*(d
but let it go"...
how serious are you about your parenting role?
why are you allowing this to happen?
if you REALLY want your kids, go get them. your "wife's" parent's
rights DO NOT PREMPT your's. just go get them (unless some court has
awarded her custody, or something which would make it kidnapping if you
did that).
but, from reading between the lines of your note, (and at the risk of
sounding super-critical of you, which I am NOT trying to be), I'd say
that wanting your kids at home when you get there is not the real
issue. Sounds more like you're upset that your "wife" is apparently
running around, and you have lost control of the situation. maybe
that's overly harsh, I don't know. Please don't take it as an attack
on YOU...notes are pretty difficult to interpret correctly.
But, I am really curious as to how this has been allowed to happen for
such a long time.
tony
|
50.2 | the say is yours | CSC32::HADDOCK | All Irk and No Pay | Mon Apr 30 1990 16:15 | 15 |
| -1 is correct. If there are not court orders to the contrary,
your "wife's" parents have no right whatsoever to tell you that
you can't take your children. If they won't give them to you,
call the police and report them for kidnapping if you have to.
A word of advice (again I am not a lawyer, but someone who has been
there). DOCUMENT as much of these shenanagans as possible. Keep
a log of when and how long she is missing, where the children are
when she is missing, and what the enteraction whith her parents is
when you try to get the children. If it comes to a divorce situration,
the judge is going to ask the same question that (-1) did-->**IF
you're allowing the children to stay with the grandparents during
these periods, just how serious is YOUR commitment to the children**?
fred();
|
50.3 | Thanks | SWAM3::SUKOVICH_RO | | Mon Apr 30 1990 17:02 | 31 |
| Hey,
Thanks for the input, .1 is right what I'd like is for my family to be
at home. I will pickup the children from the grandparents on the next
occurance. Counseling has suggested that I need to decide what I want
and she needs to decide what she wants. I had thought I was exhibiting
patience and kindness by allowing "wife" to make decisions around the
children including where and when they stay away to accomodate her
expressed desire for time/space/freedom. All the while I have continued to
finance this cr@#p. The buck stopped last night. Wife intended to go
away again to her parents as we had disagreed over an upcoming trip she
wants to make with her girlfriends. I'm selling my assets (motorcycle,
boat, weights, etc.) to pay the bills and we are in a period of discord and
I felt it uneccessary, unfeeling, improper, and not inclined to finance
a trip at this time. In so much as she doesn't want to be around and
isn't sure if she wants to be married to me at this point in time I was
relieved to hear that she wanted to run to Momma again. She packed up
the kids stuff. I told her that she could not take them without a legal
right. She stayed and told me that I'd really pi@#$ed her off now. I
arranged for alternate childcare. It had been near her work (70 miles on
crowded freeways from where she insisted on buying her dream house at
my expense, read up to 2.5 hours each way=14 hours a day to work 8
hours!) and within 1/2 mile of her parents. So today I began the Mr.Mom
routine, up at 05:30. BTW I'm very committed to them, I do feel that
they would be much better off waking up when they do naturally and
staying in their own house with their family and eating something other
than fast food for breakfast and supper etc etc etc.
Regards
|
50.4 | document document document | CSC32::HADDOCK | All Irk and No Pay | Mon Apr 30 1990 17:25 | 10 |
| re .3
I wish you all the best. However, you may be just starting down
a rough path. Again I caution you DOCUMENT (write down, keep
a diary, journal, or log of everything that happens in regards to
your children). If it comes to court, you'll need all the help
you can get. I don't know about California, but in many/most states,
a log or a journal can be used in court.
fred();
|
50.5 | help requested | GIAMEM::MACKINNON | ProChoice is a form of democracy | Tue May 01 1990 07:24 | 13 |
|
If you do decide to get a divorce, DO NOT LEAVE THE HOUSE.
It is my understanding that if you do leave the house, you basically
are "abandoning" your kids. This will give more of a "right" of
the parent that remains in the house to custody.
Can the folks in here help elaborate on this one?!!!
Also, can't he claim that she is abandoning the children?
|
50.6 | don't leave | BUDDRY::HADDOCK | All Irk and No Pay | Tue May 01 1990 09:42 | 7 |
| Definately do not leave the house unless court ordered.
You can claim that she is abandoning the children, but it is
going to be difficult if you also leave them with her parents.
Also you will need more than just your word for it. That's
why I recommend logging everything that happens.
fred();
|
50.7 | | FSTVAX::BEAN | Attila the Hun was a LIBERAL! | Tue May 01 1990 11:01 | 35 |
| did I miss something?
you and your "wife" evidently discuss this and are open about it and
your feelings with a counsellor, yet she continues to leave, taking the
kids, for days at a time, returning when it suits her. right?
she knows how you feel about this. the counsellor knows. do her
parents know???
this situation makes me want to ask so many questions...there are tons
of unknowns.
for starters:
what do YOU think her reason for leaving is? what does SHE SAY the
reason is. ("finding herself" is crap!.) what does the counsellor say?
why do her parents support her? how do THEY feel about it? what do
they think of YOUR ability to provide care for the kids (not that it
really means squat what they think...but, it might shed some light)?
do you REALLY want this relationship to get better? or would you rather
get out! you have to DECIDE and then work to that goal.
jeeeez, i recently got out of a marriage (six kids) where my wife
totally ran the show. i never allowed myself to realize how positively
horrible the relationship was because ... you supply the rationale... the
bottom line is that, like yourself (i hope) i FINALLY got fed up with
being crapped on, and DID something. you've got to make a similar
decision. like my sister (literally) told me: "either shit or get of
the pot". (apologies to those whom the vernacular offends)
good luck!
tony
|
50.8 | <?> | SWAM3::SUKOVICH_RO | | Tue May 01 1990 13:02 | 33 |
| Tony,
Let me answer a couple of your questions. I definitley want this
marriage to work. Her mom is aware of my feelings about Debbie and our
kids and their involvement. She wants this to work but when I ask her
why she allows them to stay there her she replies "Debbie is a big girl
and can make her own decisions." She says she says she has talked to
Deb and has understood that Deb wants this to work etc. I might add
that her mom has had recent experiences with Deb's dad being unfaithful
and his "other" has showed up in tears at their home and caused quite a
scene. Her stated feelings around our relationship have varied from she
wants a life with me to she's not sure, she needs space she wants to be
alone. These things are contrary to what I need. I'm convinced that I
cannot continue to support her while she parties in search of her
feelings and feel good about myself. I will require a legal seperation
or divorce to accept that she has this kind of "space" and feel like
I'm getting a fair shake. Legal seperation would mean to me that
she will not be dependent on me financially. I will support my children
should she gain custody. Our house will have to be sold. To this she
replied in tears "I don't want to do anything drastic." "I love my
house." I feel that it is our house, although she picked it out and
monitored it's construction in every detail it's my only home and I
sleep there every night. She is worried about what my family will think
of her. What difference does that make? It's not their marriage.
I've contacted a new counselor today and thursday at 13:00 pst is the
1st session. I think that we will continue to see our current counselor
who is a psychiatrist and internist for our individual problems I
suspect that he has done nothing for our marriage to this point other
than point out the obvious, that we have a problem. Thanks for
participating in this, it helps considerably to have you people
contributing.
Bob
|
50.9 | Please, folks... | USEM::MCQUEENEY | Texas bound! | Tue May 01 1990 13:14 | 10 |
| re: .7
Although swearing is tolerated to some degree in this file, please
utilize substitute characters where required. I s'pose we'll let
it go this time, just be aware that some people find the swears
offensive. If there are any complaints, .7 will be set hidden.
McQ E. Coast mod
|
50.10 | | SIVA::MACDONALD | | Tue May 01 1990 13:23 | 16 |
|
Re: .8
Your inlaws are doing what is called "enabling." By letting your wife
do what she is currently doing, they are helping her to avoid facing the
issues. Your wife's current behavior is avoiding the real problem and
is just making a more complicated mess to sort out when she wears out
everyone's patience. As to your children, if I were you I would just
show up there and take them home. You don't need anyone's permission
to do that. If you start to take action and do what YOU want, i.e.
having your children at home with you, and leaving your wife to make
her own decisions, you will be forcing the issues. Expect "stuff" to
come about as a result.
Steve
|