T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
29.1 | my suspicions: | FSTTOO::BEAN | Attila the Hun was a LIBERAL! | Wed Mar 21 1990 06:02 | 37 |
| I have wondered about this for a long time. Generally, my own answer
is that my ex's bitterness is just her style.
She was a bitter, vindictive person when we were married. Why should
she change now? She has a few friends, but they have always seemed to
come and go in her life...never seem to stay around for too long. She
is pretty much a recluse, never getting out much, except on Sunday, to
church. She is/was "pseudo" religious. By that, I mean, she goes to
church fervently (never misses) and makes the whole family go, too.
That's not necessarily bad... but, while she puts on the appearance of
being a religious person (her papa was a So. Baptist minister for 46
years before he died), she denounces many of the things/beliefs of the
church.
She is actively involved in child welfare...we were a foster family for
23 years before I left and she is earning her keep now doing the same
thing...she is excellent at being a mother to very young children.
No one can possible accuse her of not being a "good" mom...too much
public recognition for her achievements (we were once even guests on
the Phil Donahue show, along with a severly retarded foster child)...
But, she is the supreme MANIPULATOR of people. She *uses* them. to
her own advantage, and for her own cause. If I dared to object or
reject her idea/notion of what we should do, or even dared to do
anything I thought was fun/different, all he!! broke loose. She
positively was in charge. Of my life, and of the kids.
I finally got tired of living a life for someone else's benefit, sho I
bolted
I suspect that her greatest anger now is that she lost her control over
me.
I'll stop here...but the story is yet not fully told.
tony
|
29.2 | Causes me to reassess my own interactions... | FENNEL::GODIN | Hangin' loose while the tan lasts | Wed Mar 21 1990 06:48 | 29 |
| > I suspect her greatest anger now is that she lost control over me.
Right there is where I find the bitterness in my ex. Control. We were
the products of '40s and '50s homes; my place was to serve him and any
children we had; never to expect any life or fulfillment of my own.
Then the rules changed in the late '60s and early '70s. I discovered
that my needs were as valid as his and the kids. Oops, his control
over me began to slip. I started asking for, then demanding, some
acknowledgement of my contribution and my needs. Oops, further erosion
of his hold over me. Then I *gasp* went to work outside the home! I
was actually TALKING to and WORKING with and being RECOGNIZED by people
other than him. Now he's really scared. In his fear of losing control
over me, he tightened his grip harder and harder. But like toothpaste
in a tube, as his grip tightened, I escaped. The irony is that, had he
been willing to loosen his grip and allow me the little bit of
self-hood I sought, he'd have kept me. (Hard as it is to remember at
times, I did love him, once upon a time.)
Every one of the confrontations we have had since the divorce are
obvious and calculated attempts on his part to regain his control over
me. When that hasn't worked, he's tried to get back at me by exerting
additional control over the kids. Now, predictably, they're slipping
away from him, too.
In the end he's going to be left with two tightly clenched fists that
contain nothing.
Karen
|
29.3 | | FSTTOO::BEAN | Attila the Hun was a LIBERAL! | Wed Mar 21 1990 09:39 | 16 |
| I think the single most wonderful thing about my "new" wife (we've been
married just over 7 months!) is that she has NO desire to make me into
something I am not. She truly loves me for what/who I am and accepts
the same from me. It is such a contrast from the relationship I had
with my ex...where I was constantly on the "alert" for doing something
to "offend" or otherwise...well, you know.
For years and years I avoided coming home after work. I never went
anyplace (didn't drink or carouse around)...I just stayed in the office
as long as I could, and left home as early as I could...trying to avoid
her.
But, she still manages to cause pain and anger and anguish (God! I wish
I could get that out of my life!) by using the kids as tools.
tony
|
29.4 | some thoughts on the matter | CSC32::HADDOCK | All Irk and No Pay | Wed Mar 21 1990 10:34 | 35 |
|
I think a lot of it has to do with the fact that whether the woman
has left, been left, or it's a mutual split, the woman soon finds
out that "freedom" is not what it's cracked up to be. In our society
it is still the man who is "supposed" to "make sure" the family is
protected and provided for. Then the woman has all that "freedom"
dumped on her at often a very reduced income. ( Do any of us *ever*
have *enough* money? ) Couple that with the fact that there is still
a strong attitude in our society that the woman "deserves" to be
taken care of, either on her own merits or via the children (if you
don't believe me just ask any judge). Give her a couple of kids to
use as leverage, and salt liberally with "power corrupts". The
"bad situation" that a divorced woman and single mother finds herself
in is often very real. Add to that the *perception* that "he's out
there having a good ol' time".
My ex is a professional victim, and very good at it. Her livelihood
since our divorce has mainly been made by getting some organization
or another to "rescue" her. The problem with being a victim is that
you need something to be victim of. I make a very convenient target.
Also being a victim makes it unnecessary to take responsibility for
your own actions--I wouldn't have *had* to do that *if*...--things
would be a lot better "if only"....
One very hard fact that I had to learn with my divorce was that I
was not dealing with a sane and rational person. Once I figured
that out I stopped driving myself nuts by trying to make "since"
out of it all.
Again this is written from my point of view as a male and is not
intended in any way to discredit those who really *are* in a bad
situation.
fred();
|
29.5 | Bitterness is not a gender-linked trait. | FENNEL::GODIN | Hangin' loose while the tan lasts | Wed Mar 21 1990 11:06 | 15 |
| Fred, (.4), your sharing of the position you believe your ex-wife to be
in is probably more or less accurate for your situation. But I would
doubt that women (as a group), any more than men (as a group), are
shaken to discover that "freedom is not what it's cracked up to be."
I know I've heard plenty of men looking forward to being free again and
getting to play the field, only to discover that there were some benefits
to being "attached" to someone, if only that you didn't have to worry
about what people would think if they found you home alone on a Saturday
night - 8-}.
Bitterness in divorce is a two-way thing. Men are bitter. Women are
bitter. Probably in direct proportion to their representation in the
divorce statistics -- 50:50.
Karen
|
29.6 | you're right--to a point | CSC32::HADDOCK | All Irk and No Pay | Thu Mar 22 1990 10:41 | 12 |
| re -1
I think a lot of men are bitter after divorece because they find
that there is *&^% little "freedom" after divorce. Especially
if there are children involved. For many non_custodial parents,
divorce is only the beginning of years of hip-deep bs.
It's no wonder so many men just give up and s*&tcan then whole
thing. However, it's that kind of man that helps make it so
hard on those of us who do care enough to keep trying.
fred();
|
29.7 | Mister Wildlife... yeah, right! | CASDEV::SALOIS | lacrimae rerum... | Thu Mar 22 1990 12:28 | 14 |
|
One other point that can be cause for "bitterness". I've encountered
a common misconception. Seems many people figure the non-custodial
parent no longer has a care in the world, with the exception of paying
support.
I had someone tell me, "gee... must be nice. You probably party all
weekend long." Well, I suppose I have the time... but who's got the
money?
Ya know... I've never seen my child get on a school bus. Sounds kinda
trivial... but it's things like this that can cause bitterness....
|
29.8 | It's definitely not a party | CSC32::K_JACKSON | Better living through alchemy! | Thu Mar 22 1990 13:16 | 30 |
|
This is very true. In today's society, I feel everyone looks at the
negative side of things. In a non-custodial parents life, we have
been stereotyped as non-caring, non-supportive type of individuals based
on past history of deadbeat fathers and mothers who don't attempt to
care or provide child support.
Society is going after these deadbeats and I'm glad to see that. However,
has society said, "Well, your definitely a caring non-custodial parent
and you should be rewarded". I don't want to be rewarded because my
reward will be in my heart and in my childrens heart and mind. I just
want equality.
Society is full of caring individuals who can not afford child support
or are trying everything in their power to ensure that the child is
cared for. These cases should be dealt with on a one-on-one basis
and what the parent can do within their limitations. People like
this have earned my respect because they are at least trying.
I thought I would be one of them after the first couple years after my
divorce because I was getting screwed big time. Sure I could have run
off to paradise and enjoyed myself but I knew I had responsibilites because
I "assisted" in bringing them into this world.
My ex sometimes b!tches saying, "You don't know what's like raising
two girls" and my *kind* reply is "No, but I sure would like to find
out"
It's definitely not a party and the first person that said that to
me sure would get an earful.
|
29.9 | .... being such a nice guy, ya know... | CASDEV::SALOIS | lacrimae rerum... | Thu Mar 22 1990 13:45 | 11 |
|
"My ex sometimes b!tches saying, "You don't know what's like raising
two girls" and my *kind* reply is "No, but I sure would like to find
out""
I've used this line also, and may I say, it is very effective!! Any
time I get the old song and dance about how tough it is for her, I
just laugh, and tell her I'd be "more than happy to help her out"...
and she knows what that means!!
|
29.10 | | PEKING::NASHD | Whatever happened to Capt. Beaky? | Fri Mar 23 1990 01:30 | 10 |
| You can count me in on that one. I've never had the kids for an
hour let alone a weekend, I'ld love to hear them screaming around
the house etc etc. I could take them to McDonalds or other similiar
establishment, by clothes for little Vicki, play soccer with Chris.
Still, it's only 8 years and 7 months until Chris is 18 and two
years later it'll be Vicki's 18th.
If you're seeing your children this weekend, have a good time.
Dave.
|
29.11 | back from texas | FSTTOO::BEAN | Attila the Hun was a LIBERAL! | Thu Apr 12 1990 06:57 | 31 |
| Well, it's now been one week since my visit to my kids in Texas. When
I got to their house, my ex-wife met me at the door and you could cut
the ice with an axe. Of course, it didn't help that my last telephone
call wound up in a knock-down, drag-out fight with her.
My son's new girlfriend was there, too, and he later told me that the
decision for her NOT to stay at the house while visiting him was based
on the fact that he/she (and the ex) EXPECTED the atmosphere to be
thick with bitterness. Well, I guess if you expect something like
that, it's bound to happen.
I immediately dragged Peggy (the ex) into the kitchen and asked for a
truce...which, fortunately, "sort of" happened.
But, I confess, I felt extremely ill-at-ease everytime I had to see
her.
I must say though, that she stayed out of the way most of the time.
Her threat to enforce the "restriction" imposed on the kids
(perenially, it seems) was lifted while I was visiting...for that was
the cause of the heated arguement over the telephone.
She (we) are still very angry. At times (mostly when it seems
expedient for her) we are "civil" with each other, but usually, any
extended contact results in hostility.
I really envy those of you (few as you are) who can maintain some sort
of civility with your ex... that's so much less strenuous and
nerve-wracking!
tony
|
29.12 | Verbal assault shield | DYO780::EERENBERG | Thanks for the NEW start. | Mon Apr 16 1990 11:18 | 44 |
| Re .11
My ex isn't very bitter, but it is there... I just never see her
and I talk to her rarely (2 minutes on the phone the week before
I come over; it's a 6 hour drive). Maybe it's the distance that
helps keep things relatively calm. The other thing is that I have
an excellent counselor who helped me see what a bad interaction
we have always had.
Once I faced how badly/rudely/inconsiderate/bitter-people-expletives I
talked to her, I started to see a pattern. That was a painful
realization for me; that I could be the blame; but that's just it, I
can't be blamed entirely. She owned half the problem because it takes
2 to argue and be nasty. For the most part, I now control our
conversations and she has learned she can't push my buttons anymore
(ie. things that get me upset). They are well guarded. Since she
doesn't get satisfaction out of hurting me verbally, she has stopped
(well, almost, but it's such a drastic difference, it feels like she
has stopped entirely). Like I said, there are some moments of outbursts,
but they are now (finally) far and few between.
Is there a cure for bitter ex's? I don't know but if I can recommend
two things, they are:
1) Make an honest appraisal of the things you have done/do wrong with
your ex. Don't, I repeat, *DO NOT* do this without a seasoned counselor.
You simply can't be objective enough to see what kind of interaction
really goes on and you may inadvertently lay a guilt trip on yourself.
2) Learn to respect yourself. Don't let an ex push your hot buttons
causing an argument. They always seem to know what they are. They
aren't worth giving them the satisfaction.
While problems still persist, I don't have to feel guilty about my
actions now. They are much more mature and positive then while married
and I sleep better at night knowing that I've stopped directly or
indirectly hurting her with my tongue.
The above won't work for everyone, but if it helps just a couple
of people...
Thanks for letting me share,
John
|
29.13 | Thank you, John | FENNEL::GODIN | You an' me, we sweat an' strain. | Mon Apr 16 1990 11:44 | 14 |
| re. .12 (John)
Thanks! It was brave of you to point out that we who are complaining
bitterly about the bitterness in our ex's own a share of the
responsibility for the total bitterness quotient. I know it's true for
me, and I recognize how I sometimes consciously push the buttons that
will bring a negative response from my ex.
I've learned to prepare my shield against anticipated clashes with him,
but still find myself unprepared for those out-of-the-blue encounters.
You've given me something to think about.
Karen
|
29.14 | | SIVA::MACDONALD | | Tue Apr 17 1990 10:30 | 17 |
|
Re: .4 Were we married to the same woman ;^)?
I disagree that we own a share of the responsibility for the
"total bitterness quotient." Definitely I own a share of what went
wrong with the marriage, but NOT my ex's anger, resentment, or
bitterness. Those are HER feelings; That is HER stuff; and those are
HER problems. I have my own to be sure, and I do NOT attribute any of it
to her. If I am bitter and resentful then that is because that is what
I choose and the same goes for her. We often too quickly accept
responsibility for stuff that is not ours to be responsibile for.
Resentment and bitterness are nothing but evidence of unwillingness to
let go of the past and move on. They only hurt the person who
entertains them.
Steve
|
29.15 | Some other thoughts... | DYO780::EERENBERG | Thanks for the NEW start. | Wed Apr 18 1990 15:26 | 28 |
| Re .14
I don't think "total bitterness quotient" was meant quite that way.
The author of .13 will have to respond to that though.
> We often too quickly accept
> responsibility for stuff that is not ours to be responsibile for.
That's why I didn't do any heavy duty "soul searching" without a
counselor. It's too easy to fall into that trap.
I also agree with you that you don't own any responsibility whatsoever
with regard to her current bitterness. Agreed; a person who is
bitter is unwilling to let go the past and move on! I think some
like it because it feeds some misplaced need for attention (a theory
only!). If she wasn't angry at you, it would just be someone else.
Re all
One other point is future interactions. Some people who are bitter are
complete jerks! Let's face it, that happens! But where the person is
somewhat reasonable, there is hope. My present actions are somehow
incorrectly connected with the past and unless there is a significant
change in the way I deal with her, my ex would think I was just being
rude again, or "What's wrong??? He's too nice." Consistency is something
that helps me. In this case consistently short phone calls and
consistently being cordial.
John
|
29.16 | bitterness==self hate? | BENONI::JIMC | illegitimi non insectus | Wed Dec 26 1990 11:31 | 13 |
| Why is she bitter? I think it is because I called her bluff and let
her leave, then filed for divorce. As much as anything else, I think
she is angry with herself (and we all know how that kind of anger can
eat you up).
Do I perpetuate it? I hope not. I try not to, but, I think it makes
her angry all over again when she sees or hears that my life is just
fine without her. I have not had an angry word for her (she usually
(99.9%) will not speak to me :-)) in the last seven years and I try
really hard not to pull her chain or push her buttons.
My personal wish is that she would find someone else to be angry at all
the time. Get a life.
|