T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
17.1 | Where's she coming from? | CSOA1::EERENBERG | Thanks for the NEW start. | Tue Mar 13 1990 10:16 | 11 |
| Does the mother have a problem with the 2 of u living together? What I
mean is, do her values say living together isn't right? Or is she
simply being a royal pain/vindictive making life hard?
Is it some combination?
With all the emotions involved in things like this, I know it's hard to
be objective. But if you can get an honest appraisal of where she is
coming from, maybe a solution will (eventually) present itself.
> We are currently living in a rent controlled three bedroom.
This is off the subject, but what does "rent controlled" mean?
|
17.2 | | GIAMEM::MACKINNON | ProChoice is a form of democracy | Wed Mar 14 1990 10:57 | 21 |
|
Yes she most certainly does have a problem with the two of us living
together. She still insists that I am the main reason why he would
not marry her. I am part of the reason, but not the main reason.
She is merely continuing her reign of terror to satisfy her need
to get back at him for "loving me more than he loved her"(her words!).
So as far as I am concerned in relation to him, she has already
stated many times that she will do anything possible to make
life miserable for the both of "us" as long as we are together.
re rent control
Certain cities in Mass have rent control. Basically what it is is
a program whereby certain areas have caps on the amount of rent
to be paid. It was set up to prevent folks from being homeless
, but most of the folks who are in rent controlled apartments
can well aford to live in regular rent situations.
Mi
|
17.3 | Any recourse? | DYO780::EERENBERG | Thanks for the NEW start. | Fri Mar 16 1990 15:11 | 20 |
| Mi,
I can say that I know some of what your going through. I was dating
a girl whom my ex knew and then made threats that if continue to
date her she would call *her* ex husband and on and on. Then my
ex's husband got into the act. Gads!
I got with my lawyer, drafted a letter stating she was in contempt of
the divorce decree (ie. "the parties shall go their seperate ways
having no hold over the other..."). Before I sent the letter, I
confronted her directly and told (as politely as possible!?!) to stay
out of my personal life. I waited awhile and now have satisfactory
results...I never did have to send the letter. For a while there, it
was very tense.
Have you had any success trying something like that? From the looks
of things, she may have a legal recourse of sorts herself, where
as I felt my ex didn't.
John
|
17.4 | Don't let her dictate to you. | VCSESU::KINNEY | | Mon Mar 19 1990 09:58 | 38 |
| Who is "SHE" to accuse the two of you of co-habitating? Sounds like
the kettle calling the pot black (or vice versa). What I mean is that
the little girl would not be here if SHE hadn't co-habitated (if you
get my drift), so who is SHE to stand in judgment of you - whether or
not that law is still on the books in Mass. or not.
Do you know what a Pandora's box (or can of peas) this kind of case
would open in the Commonwealth? Do you realize how many people live
together these days without benefit of marriage - usually it's after a
first marriage gone sour too.
Let her put her money where her mouth is. Let her take you to court.
She was never married to the father - has no rights where he is
concerned. The father is not the custodial parent, and unless he is
physically or emotionally harming the child - HE IS entitled to
visitation with his daughter.
If I were you, I would consult with an attorney - might cost $50 for an
initial consultation, but well worth the money. Why let her DICTATE
how the two of you will live your lives?
My recommendations (2 cents worth):
1. consult with an attorney (one hour initial consultation
should cost about $50, however,
if you get in touch with lawyer
referral service, the most that a
lawyer can change for an initial
consultation is $15 for 1st visit)
2. tell her where to go
3. relax, enjoy yourself, and pity her (sounds like she needs it)
4. Good Luck.
Barb
|
17.5 | | GIAMEM::MACKINNON | ProChoice is a form of democracy | Tue Mar 20 1990 06:12 | 17 |
|
re last two
I would love to tell this woman where to go and what to do once she
gets there. However, his lawyer is adamant about this. He says
that as long as the law is on the books then we have to abide by
the law. Sure I think this is insane. But I think this whole
situation is insane. John and I were living together while
she was pregnant and it did not seem to bother her then.
They were not married so there is no divorce decree. There
supposedly is an understanding that they are not to interfere
with each others lives. But she still feels that since she
has the child then she rules the roost.
Mi
|
17.6 | I could go on for ever but you get the idea;-( | MCIS2::MILLER | | Tue Nov 06 1990 12:08 | 21 |
| I am brand new to this note. My husband of now almost 2 years and I
had this problem. At first he would stay at his room mates but then
we would wind up at one of the two places any way. I only had a small
one bed room apartment so when the kids stayed over dad and the 2 boys
slept on the sofa bed and his daughter and I would share my huge
queen sized water bed ;the kids loved it. The ex couldn't say anything.
It was and still is a tough time in the last 4 years we have moved 3
times. The next 3 places we moved to had 2 bedrooms plus an extra room
which we always turned into a room for the boys. So we lucked out.
the rents are outrageous. But everyday will be a struggle I am sure.
I can also symphatise (sp) with you on the mother issue because right
after we got married the ex flipped out and threw her middle
son out of the house 12 at the time and said you can go live with dad.
He has been with us ever since, but in essence so is she because now
she can call and come over to get him when ever she likes and if she
gets into a fight with the son she just simply brings him home and
starts a fight with my husband for a half hour in front of the house
and there really isn't anything that we can do to end that.
|
17.7 | GOOD LUCK........DON'T LET HER GET TO YOU;;;; | MCIS2::MILLER | | Tue Nov 06 1990 12:53 | 27 |
| sorry to continue that last one. the point I quess is that I agree with
the other two people who also added that people will continue to
live together. My husband put in his divorce decree that no one could
live in his house except ex and kids. If she were to marry she would
have to sell the house. so every divorce is different just like
everyone is different. It really does sound as though she does want to
make your life impossible I know becuase I feel that way everyday
and she is still trying every way she can to make life impossible
I quess the only thing that you can do is be stronger and don't let
her know that she is getting to you. (good words wish I could do it)
Remember we got married and it didnot end there, it will end though
that is when the youngest graduates and the house is sold.And that is
that as was stated in another note it all depends on how good your
lawyer is.
Another thing that was stated earlier was the price of lawyers\
they have gone up considerably but we have been to 2 different ones\
who gave us free advise. what we did was make a list of all the
questions that we needed answered and asked away for the first hour.
That was a free consultation period where in the lawyer tells what
could happen and how much it will cost. Another thing you can do
is go to court and have the party served yourself it costs $25. maybe
a little more the catch is you defend yourself but get it all down in\w
writing first brief and to the point. You served so you get to talk
so make it good. Just a few hints and tricks that we have tried
in this survival that have worked for us.
|
17.8 | Church & Commonwealth | CGVAX2::MCCLELLAN | | Fri Oct 23 1992 15:13 | 21 |
| This is a day late and a dollar short, as I just recently discovered
this notesfile.
Unfortunately, you are in Massachusetts, where the separation of church
and state would have to be done surgically. There is no such
separation in that state. Consequently, a lot of the rational used by
the courts there are based on moral values as dictated by the church
(church meaning main line religions).
I absolutely agree that if there is no physical or emotional harm
being reeked on the children, what's the problem? However, that's
not how it's seen there.
I did have to go through it myself, and the only thing that saved me
was that my ex neglected to tell her lawyer about HER live-in
boyfriend. When we made that little item known, she withdrew her
complaint.
Since your entry was some time ago, I do hope it worked out for you.
- Bill
|