T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
200.1 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Thu Nov 30 1995 13:39 | 4 |
| There is no universal significance to right vs. left for such things. I've
read "explanations" for earrings that contradict each other.
Steve
|
200.2 | Whatever you like! | MAL009::RAGUCCI | | Thu Nov 30 1995 15:33 | 11 |
|
there is some meaning for wedding band type of rings worn on each
middle finger for same sex couples. or it can mean balance with
men and women.or, whatever you like!
ie. a "pinky" ring was considered classy, and for only the rich
many years ago.(at least that's what I heard)
BR
|
200.3 | | CONSLT::MCBRIDE | Reformatted to fit your screen | Thu Nov 30 1995 15:35 | 9 |
| At least in the U.S. the wedding ring is on the left hand. It is often
worn on the right in Europe (at least I was told it was) and in the
U.S. if the person is a widower.
Claddagh rings can be worn on either. Heart out, no beau, heart in,
spoken for. You also are not suppsed to buy your own. These are
things I was told and have observed.
Brian
|
200.4 | | CSC32::HADDOCK | Saddle Rozinante | Thu Nov 30 1995 17:19 | 16 |
|
I heard that the wedding/engagement ring is worn on the "ring" finger
of the left hand because the blood vessel in that finger has an almost
direct path to the heart. The one in the "ring" finger on the right
does also, but because the heart is positioned slightly to the left, the
left hand is closer.
"Engagement" rings used to be Ruby until some enterprising jewelry
salesman got into the act.
The only other thing I know is that "class" rings should be worn so
that you can read the inscription before graduation, then turned
so that the person facing you can read the inscription after
graduation.
fred();
|
200.5 | Just my 2 cents... | SCASS1::WHITEA | | Fri Dec 01 1995 17:24 | 4 |
| I think it's incredibly sexy for a man to have both ears pierced.
Especially if he wears hoop earrings.
|
200.6 | | SX4GTO::OLSON | Doug Olson, ISVETS Palo Alto | Fri Dec 01 1995 17:35 | 5 |
| I often wear silver and turquoise jewelry - I have some very nice
bracelets and rings. No earrings yet - saving that for midlife crisis
(that's a joke I'm making, I think.)
DougO
|
200.7 | There is a significance | CASDOC::HEBERT | Captain Bligh | Sun Dec 03 1995 20:34 | 9 |
| We were married in a Ukrainian Catholic Church, which follows the
Byzantine Rite (Eastern Orthodox?); i.e., we do not follow the pope, but
have our own Patriarch. Our rings were placed on the ring fingers of our
right hands, and that's where they stay.
I think Greek Orthodox followers also wear their wedding rings on their
right hands.
Art
|
200.8 | Yes - to both ears! | SHRCTR::SCHILTON | Press any key..no,no,not that one! | Mon Dec 04 1995 09:21 | 4 |
| Ditto on the "sexiness" of men wearing small hoops in both ears.
(A lot of younger men do that in the UK).
Sue
|
200.9 | | CSC32::HADDOCK | Saddle Rozinante | Mon Dec 04 1995 09:52 | 12 |
|
I recently bought a new watch after my old Timex finally gave out and
traded up to a bit nicer model, but I absolutely refuse to wear rings.
Even a wedding band. My nephew still has a finger thanks to modern
micro-surgery, but I have seen all to many men lose a finger to vanity.
As far as earrings go, I have an aversion to putting any extra holes
in places where God didn't put them already. So y'all are just going
to have to make due ;^).
fred();
|
200.10 | Is it true, I dunno! | NAC::WALTER | | Mon Dec 04 1995 12:39 | 6 |
| My grandmother (Catholic) used to tell me that women were given
engagement rings to show the women that the man wanted to care and
support her and if they ran into hard times, they would sell the ring.
Kinda like an investment? :)
|
200.11 | | MKOTS3::RAUH | I survived the Cruel Spa | Mon Dec 04 1995 13:07 | 9 |
| WoW!! I remember.... aaaahem... the 70's and the open shirt and the
gold chains. Mr. T starter kits.:) Guess time they are a changing.;)
The only thing I sport is my Seiko watch. Gold, kinda.:) Rings? Welp...
as a floor techie some years ago I welded my wedding ring between +12
and ground once. Not a pretty picture and a tuff one to explain to the
boss man when I ruined some nifty $$$$$ board. Years later, I just
don't want to give anyone the wrong empression. I am elegible.:)
|
200.12 | I'VE GOT 3 PIECES, WATCH AND 2 RINGS | STOWOA::RONDINA | | Mon Dec 04 1995 17:01 | 26 |
| I love jewelry and I love giving my wife jewelry. As far as women's
jewelry goes, there is a wide selection of truly artistic and beautiful
stuff. Fortunately, my wife does not like it, so I am spared the
expense.
As for men's jewelry, small range of choices, mostly very common and
usual stuff, no creativity. Large gold, nubby rings, with lions,
eagles, you name it. Ear rings - IMHO - a little too teenager-like.
So what's left? tie tacks (out of style at least for now), huge belt
buckles (I don't have a Harley.) Cuff Links (Ok- Boston Brahmins still
cleave to this icon,I expect), Class Rings (Time to grow up). Pinky
Rings - oh pah-lease! Bolo Ties (good for Arizona and western dances),
So men's jewelry - not worth the time to shop. I have only 2 jewelry
pieces - a Zuni Indian Ring, and a watch made with Abalone Shell face.
Both pieces get a reaction from men and women because they are unusual.
My opinion - men's jewelry is just about as exciting as men's clothing.
I expect the male equivalent of jewelry is equipment, machinery, tools and
gear. Most men I know love to collect that kind of stuff.
My 2 cents (and not much more)
Paul
|
200.13 | Hard pressed to wear a watch | SALEM::DACUNHA | | Tue Dec 05 1995 15:24 | 6 |
|
Jewelry would only detract from my natural beauty.
|
200.14 | | MKOTS3::RAUH | I survived the Cruel Spa | Tue Dec 05 1995 15:49 | 2 |
| .13 ooooooooohhhhhh... Mr/Ms Natural?;]
|
200.15 | jewerly | DELNI::WHEELER | Chickens have no bums | Fri Dec 08 1995 12:51 | 24 |
|
Well, Paul, Scott (my husband) is up to 4 earrings (all in 1
in ear - 1 small gold hoop and 3 diamonds) He is talking about
having the other ear done (1 hole). Deal is, when I buy HIM
another diamond earring he'll have it done. (Most likely
santa claus will leave it in his christmas stocking - the earring
that is!)
When he bought my enagement ring, I bought him a claddagh ring.
He also wears a wedding band. Bought him a nice short gold
chain for his birthday when we were first dating.
He wears cheap watches... Something with his body chemistry
is always killing batteries/etc...
When he is at work the rings go in his pocket, or on his
gold chain.
I really believe, for the most part, nice gifts are a 2 way
street. If I expect to be given diamonds/etc, then he should
expect to be given them also.
/robin
|
200.16 | Diamonds - for women only??? | STOWOA::RONDINA | | Fri Dec 08 1995 13:41 | 10 |
| Can anyone verify this rumor? I heard it from somewhere (and quite a
few years ago at that) that Tiffany's (the famous NY Jewelers) advise
that diamonds should not be worn by men.
One other fact I accumulated; Diamonds are a semi-precious stone. The
only thing that makes them so expensive is that the diamond mines
control production and distribution. So why buy them at all when Cubic
Zirconia's are cheaper and good ones can certainly fool most everyone.
Feedback welcomed.
|
200.17 | | CSC32::M_EVANS | cuddly as a cactus | Fri Dec 08 1995 13:49 | 6 |
| CZ is too bright and flawless to me to look quite real, as opposed to a
diamond which is likely to have small flaws and inclusions and "off"
colors. Colored CZ looks even more fake.
However give me amethysts, emeralds or saphires any time! Clear white
stones look too "cold" to me.
|
200.18 | | CSC32::HADDOCK | Saddle Rozinante | Fri Dec 08 1995 14:43 | 26 |
|
re .16
> Can anyone verify this rumor? I heard it from somewhere (and quite a
> few years ago at that) that Tiffany's (the famous NY Jewelers) advise
> that diamonds should not be worn by men.
Never heard this one, but nobody had better tell the NFL. The Super
Bowl rings often contain a goodly number of diamonds.
> One other fact I accumulated; Diamonds are a semi-precious stone. The
> only thing that makes them so expensive is that the diamond mines
> control production and distribution.
True. DeBeers of South Africa controls about 98% of all diamond
trade.
>So why buy them at all when Cubic
> Zirconia's are cheaper and good ones can certainly fool most everyone.
Someone once asked Zigfeld why he didn't just dress is girls in
cheaper domestic lace rather than the expensive French lace because
no one would know the difference. His reply, "Because the girls will
know".
fred();
|
200.19 | | MKOTS3::RAUH | I survived the Cruel Spa | Fri Dec 08 1995 15:46 | 6 |
| Rings on her fingers
bells on her toes
a bone in her nose
Ho-ho!
(Ahab the Arab bits of the song)
|
200.20 | Jewels !!!!!!!! | VYGER::HAMILTONS | | Tue Dec 12 1995 04:06 | 20 |
| I no longer wear any jewellry (sp ?) Not since I lost a "pinky" finger
2 years ago in a horrendous beer_drinking_accident ! ;-)
The lovely lady noter ::SCHILTON has seen the damage it has done. Out
came the hoop earring from my left ear (in the uk if you have only your
right ear pierced your considered a poof. Both ears pierced means the
same as having only the left one done), off came the ring from my
middle finger too. I will through time wear a chain round my neck
(that's if my mum buys me one for my 21st in March), and if I'm unlucky
enough to get married, the ring will go on my chain.
The only jewellry I now have are the two tattoos that I have had for 3
and 4 years, at least I can't lose them.
FWIW.
I have seen a couple of girls with a diamond stud in their noses, and
it's a mega turn-on.
Scott Hamilton
|
200.21 | Hes knows how flatter an old woman!! :-) | SHRCTR::SCHILTON | Press any key..no,no,not that one! | Tue Dec 12 1995 09:18 | 34 |
| re .20
What a nice young man, that Scott Hamilton, eh?! :-) Anyway, when I was
in the UK in August I met young Master Scott, saw his finger ... he even
let me touch it!! His finger, that is. I can understand his reluctance
to wear anything now that would "catch".
>> I will through time wear a chain round my neck (that's if my mum buys me
>>one for my 21st in March),
March 7 - should we start the collection now? :-)
>> if I'm unlucky enough to get married, the ring will go on my chain.
Scott, I'm sorry to hear you say this. You don't mean it, do you?
>> The only jewellry I now have are the two tattoos that I have had for 3
>> and 4 years, at least I can't lose them.
Good point - tattoos are about as personal for body_adornment as you can
get. Except that a friend of mine here in the office had one done 4 weeks
ago and was nearly hospitalized from an allergic reaction to the dye.
We thought she'd develop blood-poisoning. And her body still hasn't
stopped fighting the invading allergen (the dye)....this is potentially
more damaging to the body (ie death) than getting an ear torn or a
finger off.
>> I have seen a couple of girls with a diamond stud in their noses, and
>> it's a mega turn-on.
I like seeing noses pierced, too.
Sue (with the gold pinky ring that never comes off)
|
200.22 | Flattery gets you everywhere !! | VYGER::HAMILTONS | | Tue Dec 12 1995 11:58 | 9 |
| Of course I don't really mean it Sue, just my sarcastic scottish wit
showing through yet again ! ;-)
Scott (who thought his pinky ring would never come off ! )
|
200.23 | You know these whipper-snappers... | SHRCTR::SCHILTON | Press any key..no,no,not that one! | Tue Dec 12 1995 13:36 | 3 |
| Shall I just laugh it off or cut him to the bone?
Sue
|
200.24 | Tattoos and Nose Piercings - not for me! | STOWOA::RONDINA | | Wed Dec 13 1995 08:23 | 12 |
| Anyone want to start a discussion on tatoos?
I don't have one, but most older folks I have met who had one done when
in a younger/drunker state, now hate them and wished they'd never done
it. Origin, I heard, came from sailors who saw it done in the
Polynesian Islands and brought the practice back home.
Nose piercing - dangerous, supposedly, you can lose your nose, if an
infection sets in and it worsens.
Boy, am I full of good news! Just the facts, ma'am (at least as I
heard/read them).
|
200.25 | Branding | DELNI::WHEELER | Chickens have no bums | Wed Dec 13 1995 10:39 | 10 |
|
Never mind tattoos and body piercing - thats OLD stuff.
The current craze is BRANDING - Yes, branding, as in hot
metal (a design of course) applied to your skin to leave
a permanent mark.
What I want to know if if you have a brand, not if you have
a tattoo!
/robin
|
200.26 | | MKOTS3::RAUH | I survived the Cruel Spa | Wed Dec 13 1995 10:58 | 1 |
| EEEegads!! Sounds like round up time on the cattle ranch!!
|
200.27 | | BIGQ::GARDNER | justme....jacqui | Wed Dec 13 1995 12:04 | 2 |
|
is it on the RUMP????
|
200.28 | Ouch! | SHRCTR::SCHILTON | Press any key..no,no,not that one! | Wed Dec 13 1995 13:45 | 6 |
| Eeeeeoooooo...Robin....
I burned myself on the toaster this morning - that was enough
for me!!
Sue
|
200.29 | Branding, you say?! | SHRCTR::SCHILTON | Press any key..no,no,not that one! | Wed Dec 13 1995 13:46 | 3 |
| You know, I'm thinking ... I live such a sheltered life.
Sue
|
200.30 | This one absolutely not for me!!! | STOWOA::RONDINA | | Wed Dec 13 1995 14:00 | 5 |
| Yikes!!! You mean, like red hot poker to skin? I thought only bad guys
did that, like Nazis during WW2. Now, people are doing it for "kicks".
If yes, we are talking serious pain and deformity here.
Human beings never cease to amaze me!!!???!!!
|
200.31 | "Not a rub on tattoo" | DELNI::WHEELER | Chickens have no bums | Wed Dec 13 1995 14:10 | 8 |
|
Come on, Sue! You a sheltered life! Remember who your talking
to here!!
Yep, branding, as in arms, backs, legs, etc, etc. A scar in
your choice of design! Just a little to hard-core for me...
|
200.32 | Casting *no* aspersions on Robin, of course!! | SHRCTR::SCHILTON | Press any key..no,no,not that one! | Wed Dec 13 1995 14:16 | 4 |
| Yes, now...a sheltered life. Where I got to know you....I would
expect to see brands!! :-)
Sue
|
200.33 | | TP011::KENAH | Do we have any peanut butter? | Wed Dec 13 1995 15:24 | 4 |
| I got a tattoo seven years ago -- I was 37 at the time. I thought
long and hard before getting it, because I knew it was PERMANENT.
No regrets.
|
200.34 | Nothing New... | SCASS1::WHITEA | | Wed Dec 13 1995 17:58 | 7 |
|
Hey, branding is nothing new. Most traditionally African American
fraternities have been branding for years. (I have a small brand
myself.) My boyfriend in college had 136 "hits" (brands).
Amanda
|
200.35 | Ouch that sounds sore ! | VYGER::HAMILTONS | | Thu Dec 14 1995 09:02 | 9 |
| I wonder what a brand would look like after 30 years ? Would it dull
down in colour, or maybe stretch ?
Anyone know ?
Scott (brandless)
|
200.36 | not to change the subject, but...\ | BIGQ::GARDNER | justme....jacqui | Thu Dec 14 1995 09:12 | 4 |
|
Hey Paul, when is Hat's Off Deli opening????
;*)
|
200.41 | | SMURF::PBECK | Rob Peter and pay *me*... | Mon Dec 18 1995 14:36 | 2 |
| If you have your identity branded where it's visible, it could help
a lot with name brand recognition.
|