| Title: | Discussions of topics pertaining to men |
| Notice: | Please read all replies to note 1 |
| Moderator: | QUARK::LIONEL E |
| Created: | Thu Jan 21 1993 |
| Last Modified: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Number of topics: | 268 |
| Total number of notes: | 12755 |
posted in human_relations also.
<<< QUARK::USER_DISK:[NOTES$LIBRARY]HUMAN_RELATIONS.NOTE;1 >>>
-< What's all this fuss about "sax and violins"? >-
================================================================================
Note 87.0 AFTER THE DIVORCE 1 reply
POWDML::RABOIN 19 lines 20-FEB-1995 14:01
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Has anyone out there had the experience of being called back
into court after the divorce was finalized and all support payments
completed for the purpose of the ex to request more money or alimoney?
A friend of mine received a letter from his ex's lawyer asking him
for a financial statement and for him to appear in court next week.
Question: Doesn't the court have to be petitioned by the ex's
lawyer and then the court would send a notice if the
request for a hearing were valid?
My own feeling (and I could be wrong) was that under the circumstances,
all payments have been made/she has the house, that he only had the
obligation to appear if the court instructed him and not via a letter
from a lawyer?
Any opinions/experiences re similar situation.
BR
| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 156.1 | MKOTS3::RAUH | I survived the Cruel Spa | Tue Feb 21 1995 15:04 | 3 | |
Have the councle file a seperate motion for the ex to file a support
affidavitt. What is she making? What are the expences she is listing
for a shortage.
| |||||
| 156.2 | CSC32::HADDOCK | Saddle Rozinante | Tue Feb 21 1995 15:15 | 11 | |
The laws of most states allow for "support" payments (both alimony and
"child support") to be reviewed from time to time to see if they
should be adjusted. He can send the information voluntarily, or they
can go into court and have the judge order him to supply the
information. The thing to do, as George said, is to get her
information at the same time.
And he thought he was finisned with all that ;^).
fred();
| |||||
| 156.3 | Good luck on this one | GMASEC::CLARK | Wed Feb 22 1995 20:40 | 13 | |
Does not sound good. Me brother-in-law got a continual reaming from the
state of Maine. If this is taking place in the PRM it could be even
worse. My poor brother-in-law was a teacher in the same school system
as his ex. Everytime they got a raise, she took him back to court. His
lawyer offered up as evidence what the ex was making, her present
husband's income, what new toys they had bought, etc. Did absolutely
no good. So, the ex got half of every raise (after he paid the taxes
of course) and then had the nerve, when the kid turned 18 in Feb, to
ask that "as a good Dad to continue payments until the kid got out of
high school". He laughed loud and long. Today, after finding out what
went on all those years , the son doesn't even speak to her and hasn't
even seen her since he left after high school graduation. One day your
friend will be rid of the burden - it just seems forever.
| |||||