T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
138.1 | | SX4GTO::OLSON | Doug Olson, SDSC West, Palo Alto | Mon Oct 17 1994 15:42 | 8 |
| I am very cautious about making long term committments because I think
it is very extraordinary to actually find someone with whom you can be
compatible over an entire lifetime. I would recommend that you never
get yourself into such a dreadfully incompatible situation. Once
having put yourself there, I have no idea how you'll get to a
resolution that will satisfy everybody. Good luck.
DougO
|
138.2 | Surprise! You're expendable! | CSC32::HADDOCK | Saddle Rozinante | Mon Oct 17 1994 16:30 | 15 |
| re .0
The answer is that you don't have a lot of leverage here. "Being
reasonable" depends totally on the other party also being reasonable.
You can file for divorce and fight for custody as long as your bank
account holds out and your lawyer doesn't sell you down the river, and
hope to *&^%$ that the judge agrees that her behavior endangers the
children (good luck). The way the laws and courts are currently
rigged, if the loss of your love and support isn't enough to make them
take notice, then you're s***ed. When it comes to power, she has it
all. Even the loss of your support is not likely since the courts will
force you to continue supporting them long after you've been eliminated
from the picture.
fred();
|
138.3 | | WLDBIL::KILGORE | Help! Stuck inside looking glass! | Mon Oct 17 1994 17:28 | 17 |
|
I'm not sure what .0 means by "mutually exclusive"; my assumption is
that we are talking about two faiths that, although you belong to
either one or the other, at least recognize each other and initially
accepted the interfaith marriage.
I also assume that you and your wife explored in some detail your
religious difference prior to your marriage and had come to some type
of agreement regarding the conduct of your married life, including the
rearing of children.
In that position, I would try to start some discussion to determine
what has changed between then and now to create the current situation.
Perhaps a chat over coffee with representatives of your respective
religions (priest, rabbi, etc) would uncover some "hard-line" stance
that is fairly recent and religiously unnecessary.
|
138.4 | agree to disagree | BBIV02::RANGAN | | Tue Oct 18 1994 05:15 | 32 |
| Any religion, belief or principle, when followed to the extreme
(blindly, that is) makes things difficult for people around the
believer. The base note proves this point. For example, when one is a
vegan (an extreme form of vegetarianism, say, for religious reasons)
the person would find it difficult to socialise with others who are not
vegan. Most social interaction would have to be planned based on one's
vegan habits...
To a person driven by religious belief alone 'reasonable' becomes
subjective. Since religion is often based on faith, reason can take a
back seat. When you argue (or merely discuss an issue) with a believer
from a logical point of view, you can be struck down, since the
believer depends upon conviction where as you will depend upon simple
logic. Faith has nothing to do with logic or reason. (It need not be
illogical, though).
What does one do then ? I have seen many believers see reason but
during the period of change, the people around the person may have to
pay a heavy price, say, in medical emergencies.. it would be difficult
to wait for a person to see reason and summon medical assistance while
a dear one lies in a life and death situation. Patience is definitely a
major requirement if the relationship has to continue.
Sometimes, it may help to adopt a give and take attitude. 'I will
respect your right to religion and practise it myself to some extent.
In return, let us agree that you will do the same in these following
matters.'
If there is serious disagreement on these areas or one party doesn't
honour the agreement, well then, see the previous responses.
Ranganathan
|
138.5 | more | BRUMMY::WILLIAMSM | Born to grep | Tue Oct 18 1994 14:26 | 14 |
| The issue of faith didn't really arise untill children came along.
The more cynical may argue that she didn't have any leaverage over the
relationship untill the snappers arrived but know she has it all. I
have no desire to affect my wifes spiritual life, but she does mine.
And, far more importantly that of the kids.
I think what has happened is that her faith has grown much stronger
over the passing years and she know "knows" thruths that were only
questions before. So what reason do the faithfull have to be
reasonable when any disagreement is simply wrong. I admit that I don't
give her beliefs much time I see no need. But, perhaps in order to
stay close to my kids I need acting leasons at least.
Michael (.0)
|
138.6 | Been there.... | BSS::PAUL | | Tue Oct 18 1994 14:38 | 23 |
| Hi Michael,
I have been there....My husband was the same way. I ended up not
having very much respect for him....It's now been a year or so when he
finally stopped " preaching" to me and the children. I almost left him
because of this....
I tried endlessly to explain to him...I wanted religion to be a
way of life....not have him with his head in the clouds kicking us in
the face....that wasn't what it was all about!!! I felt he needed to
feel like he had to rule us in order for us to live in Heaven....
My children didn't dare do anything wrong because they felt they
were'nt obeying thier father...
He would start preaching again to them.....I want my children to
"know" they have a "loving" Father in Heaven that loves them no matter
what! I don't want them growing up with guilt or bitterness...and turn
thier backs on religion all together.....we all need something good in
our lives....
Needless to say Michael,,,,,we have grown from this experience....
Lois
|
138.7 | | PASTIS::MONAHAN | humanity is a trojan horse | Wed Oct 19 1994 04:45 | 11 |
| You don't say which religion, or whether she has a particular
religious mentor that might have ideas of their own that are not a
neccessary part of the religion. If this is the case then persuading
her to talk to other distinguished practitioners of the religion might
help.
For example, I have recently been reading the Koran, and there are
several passages about tolerance and cooperation with Jews and
Christians, and also about equality between men and women - the
all-covering traditional womens dress was merely strong advice in a
difficult situation rather than a religious directive.
|
138.8 | Hummm.... | MROA::MAHONEY | | Fri Oct 21 1994 14:08 | 24 |
| Be careful.... "extremism" is very dangerous indeed. Remember "Jones"
that induced the suicide of about 800 people.... The Daviduck (?) in
Texas, suicide of 50 plus... a recent one in Europe of about 28... and
all these deaths were cause by "religion" how can that be possible?
still... it happened.
Religion, the way I see it, is something very private, just for
oneself, a means of strengthening our values, our inner shelf but never
to impose those to others... that is not called faith, but coertion...
and who needs that?
It seems that religion is something to be discussed before marriage to
avoid conflicts later on in life... I don't know what I would do if I
were in your shoes, but lema is my religion is for me alone, I don't
invade any others ground and I do NOT allow anyone invade mine. thanks
God, my husband shares my religion and so our kids, so we all have the
same foundation and same beliefs, there is no conflict whatsoever. I
would say, be patient but firm, she should not invade "your" ground and
much less, those of your children. They should be free to choose by
themselves when the time comes.
I wish you lots of luck. Your problem is not easy...
Ana
|
138.9 | RELIGION GOOD OR BAD ?? | JOBURG::FRANK | Frank Robertson | Wed Jul 12 1995 12:18 | 32 |
| MICHEAL,
I FEEL DEEPLY FOR THIS MOMENT BUT I NEED TO ESTABLISH A FEW THINGS.
FIRSTLY, I AM A BORN AGAIN CHRISTIAN. I BELIEVE THAT JESUS DIED TO SET
US FREE FROM MANY THINGS INCLUDING SICKNESS AND DESEASES,
AND EVEN DEATH.
YES, JESUS CHRIST CAN HEAL.
I DO NOT KNOW WHAT FAITH YOU OR YOUR WIFE ARE BUT I KNOW THIS THAT IF
WHAT EVER SHE DOES AND IT WORKS IT IS GOOD.
IF SHE IS BORN AGAIN AND ATTENDING A SOLIDLY GROUNDED CHURCH SHE SHOULD
SPEAK TO THE PASTOR. HOWEVER IF SHE HAS JUST GONE OFF ON SOME WILD
GOOSE CHASE AND NOT BEING CONCERNED FOR THE SAFETY OF THE CHILDREN
THEN THIS IS WRONG.
THOUGH SOME CHURCHES OR RELIGIONS ARE JUST FAKING THE POWER OF GOD TO
HEAL, I HOPE THIS IS NOT TRUE. PLEASE REMEMBER THAT JESUS CAME INTO
THE WORLD SO THAT WE MAY BE SAVED AND NOT PERISH.
I WILL PRAY FOR YOU EVEN THOUGH YOU YOURSELF DO OR DO NOT BELIEVE IS
THIS WONDERFUL THING.
I AM IN NO WAY TEAMING UP WITH YOUR WIFE I JUST WANT TO TELL YOU TO GET
DIVORCED WILL HARM THE CHILDREN MORE THAN ANY OTHER THING. ANYTHING YOU
DO IN THIS TIME YOU WILL LAY SEED FOR YOUR CHILDREN TO PLANT AND WATER.
FRANK CONCERNED
|
138.10 | | TP011::KENAH | Do we have any peanut butter? | Wed Jul 12 1995 12:54 | 3 |
| Frank:
Please use mixed case -- all upper case appears like you're shouting.
|
138.11 | | STRATA::WILBER | Live Simply, that others may simply Live | Thu Jul 13 1995 01:27 | 5 |
| Seems like he *was* SCREAMING.
To each his own.
jeff
|
138.12 | equipment issues | SWAM2::ROGERS_DA | Sedat Fortuna Peritus | Tue Jul 18 1995 17:09 | 3 |
| Maybe he was using an ASR33.
[dale]
|
138.13 | Upper and Lower Case Issue Closed | JOBURG::FRANK | Frank Robertson | Thu Jul 20 1995 09:15 | 8 |
| Dale and Others,
I am sorry for that but I, "Here Is My Excuse, I was so busy thinking
about the situation i forgot the type Style.
My Apologies Guys.
Frank.
|