T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
94.1 | Screening | SALEM::GILMAN | | Fri Oct 29 1993 10:46 | 18 |
| I didn't realize that SO many men die of prostate cancer. (Its time we
paid more attention to our diets guys)
How is it not PC to fund cancer screening programs for men? Aren't
there screening programs for things like heart disease for men, or
for other diseases for men?
It may be that because the average life expectancy for men has
increased that prostate cancer has a chance to develop. You know if
you avoid most of the things that can kill you, SOMETHING is going to
wind up getting you eventually.
Yeah, I know, this is not a prostate cancer discussion per se... but a
discussion of why there aren't screening programs for men on this
disease.
Jeff
|
94.2 | | WFOV11::LAFLEUR | | Sat Oct 30 1993 04:21 | 7 |
| In 1993 the amount spent on breast cancer research was $190 milion
the 1994 budget calls for $260 million to be spent
In 1993 the amount spent on prostate cancer was less than $50 million
There is no increase planned for 1994.
bill
|
94.3 | Questions and more questions. | ASDG::FOSTER | Like a Phoenix Rising | Mon Nov 01 1993 10:26 | 39 |
|
Do you think men have difficulty addressing the need for more research
in the area of prostate cancer? Do you think they have difficulty
articulating the importance of fighting something that is so closely
tied with sexual organs?
Or is something else in the way?
If you look at how the women's movement is addressing breast cancer,
women are being taught to do self-exams, and to be more honest and
open-eyed about the subject. And, as more women are educating
themselves about breast cancer, they are fighting for funding.
Perhaps there needs to be a similar revolution among men. Perhaps
prostate cancer can be self-detected? Perhaps more men need to organize
and discuss the realities of it so that more men are aware of the need
to fight it.
Women have worked VERY hard to take the shame out of breast cancer, and
that goes a long way in helping women who have it, or are susceptible
to it, fight it sooner, and more effectively.
How do men feel about Prostate cancer? Do they know which men in their
families have had it or died from it? Do they know if they are
susceptible to it? And what activities or tendencies may put them at
risk? Are they able to talk to their doctors about it when they have
physicals? Are they encouraged to do so?
When I get my physical exam, I am ALWAYS asked whether I'm doing my own
self-exam. I typically reply with a sheepish no, and get a lecture...
and a breast exam. This is how seriously doctors are now taking breast
cancer. It's ALL about catching it early. I've also been to talks at
Digital where women shared their experience with breast cancer, with
the focus being on "catch it early, before it kills you". Would men GO
to a similar seminar? Does information dessimination have to be
different for men?
A lot of questions... the answers really should come from the folks for
whom prostate cancer has the most impact.
|
94.4 | | AIMHI::RAUH | I survived the Cruel Spa | Mon Nov 01 1993 10:59 | 5 |
|
Sticking your finger up your tush to see how things are going for a
self exam might be alittle more difficult than doing your breast.;]
|
94.6 | So, you'd rather die? | ASDG::FOSTER | Like a Phoenix Rising | Mon Nov 01 1993 12:44 | 4 |
| RE .4
I guess that's the question - if sticking your finger up your anal
canal can save your life, how many men would do it on a regular basis?
|
94.7 | | AIMHI::RAUH | I survived the Cruel Spa | Mon Nov 01 1993 12:47 | 4 |
| .6 you missed the point. You might not reach your prostrate glan with the
finger in you anal canal.
|
94.8 | Is not the same... | MR4DEC::MAHONEY | | Mon Nov 01 1993 12:58 | 11 |
| regarding .4
the question is not "skicking your finger up your anal canal can save
your life" it takes more than that, it takes a doctor's knowledge to
judge what is inside and if there is any anormality at all, or change,
I don't think that anybody can have that knowledge without extensive
training along with a doctor's degree in medicine or similar
qualifications while a woman can really feel a lump in her breast if there
is one with a single stroke, as easy as that... there is no comparison.
Ana
|
94.9 | Prostate | SALEM::GILMAN | | Mon Nov 01 1993 13:53 | 16 |
| I would think a self anal exam (prostate) might be a bit difficult to
perform on oneself ASSUMING you know what feels right and what doesn't.
It is easy to perform a self exam on ones testicles though. Also the
symptoms of prostate cancer can be watched for:
Difficultity in urination
Frequency of urination
An ache in the prostate area
A change in the urine stream (diminished)
Often the above symtoms signal BPH (benign prostate enlargement) not
prostate cancer... but the symtoms can similiar at first so not to
panic if you have the above... but get it checked out by your Dr.
Jeff
|
94.10 | blood test | USWRSL::HINDLEY_DO | | Mon Nov 01 1993 19:37 | 3 |
| There is a blood test available for the detection of prostate
cancer. Why isn't it included in the yearly physical?
|
94.11 | just kidding | VAXWRK::STHILAIRE | so why can't we? | Tue Nov 02 1993 09:50 | 4 |
| re .10, it's a feminist plot to get rid of men!! :-)
Lorna
|
94.12 | | CSC32::M_EVANS | hate is STILL not a family value | Tue Nov 02 1993 11:28 | 14 |
| The blood test in question is the PSA. Often health fairs at malls,
etc. will offer this test.
This test is not without its failures though. Two weeks before my
father died from advanced prostate cancer (Bone involvement, lung/heart
involvement, you name it involvemnt), he had his last PSA test, and it
had shown that over the last 6 months his PSA content had fallen. Also
PSA can be high in perfectly healthy men.
I guess it's like breast cancer tests. Sometimes the more deadly forms
don't show up on a mammogram, and the "markers" don't show up in blood
tests either.
Meg
|
94.13 | | COMET::PERCIVAL | I'm the NRA, USPSA/IPSC, NROI-RO | Wed Nov 03 1993 14:03 | 12 |
| <<< Note 94.10 by USWRSL::HINDLEY_DO >>>
> There is a blood test available for the detection of prostate
> cancer. Why isn't it included in the yearly physical?
It depends on your Doctor, the test WAS part of mine.
You may want to ask this question of YOUR Doctor.
Jim
|
94.14 | Mine is Dr. Vinny Boombha;) | AIMHI::RAUH | I survived the Cruel Spa | Wed Nov 03 1993 15:35 | 1 |
|
|
94.15 | Baseline | SALEM::GILMAN | | Thu Nov 04 1993 15:43 | 6 |
| Its not a bad idea to get a PSA test even if your not suspicious of
your prostate. The baseline it provides is helpful in future PSA
evaluations.
Jeff
|
94.16 | PSA Test | SALEM::PERRY_W | | Fri Nov 05 1993 07:24 | 14 |
|
Just a comment:
I had my yearly checkup at my HMO and the primary physician would
not have done the PSA test if I hadn't requested it. I felt that
he tried to discourage me from having the PSA test but I insisted.
The primary physician did tell me that the test was not an
accurate indicator (not his exact words) of prostate cancer.
I am curious if other HMO's or private physicians have the same
attitude toward the PSA test. Appreciate any response!
Readers digest had an article about the PSA test that strongly
encouraged men to have the PSA test for each exam. Be aware that
Readers Digest oftentimes mixes fiction with fact.
Bill.
|
94.17 | | ASDG::FOSTER | Like a Phoenix Rising | Fri Nov 05 1993 10:39 | 7 |
|
There are similar issues with the mammogram - according to some
physicians, it is NOT recommended for women under 30 unless there's
breast cancer in the family. That's why the self-exam and the manual
"feel" check are so important. It may be that there's a similar issue
for men.
|
94.18 | | STARCH::WHALEN | Rich Whalen | Wed Nov 10 1993 22:50 | 13 |
| re .16
I recently had a physical, and I asked my doctor if they were doing a
PSA with the blood that they were taking for tests. He explained how
the HMO had debated it, presented pros and cons, (he ended up writing
both!) and eventually decided to do it. From what I understand, and he
confirmed, it's important to establish a baseline. PSA will generally
increase with age, but it's the rate of increase that's critical.
Also, the treatment for prostate cancer has rather unpleasant
side-effects - high probability of incontenence and impotenence.
Rich
|
94.19 | Prostate or Breast Cancer, it's a common battle. | KAOOA::SLADE | | Tue Nov 16 1993 08:47 | 27 |
| There was an article recently in the editorial page of a newspaper with
the headlines "If Males died from Breast Cancer research would be
better funded." Further the author, a woman, further stated that "The
women who die from breast cancer are the mothers, wives or sisters of
the guys who make the political decisions, that's why; we arn't a
special interest group."
I was rather taken back by the article for various reasons since the
reasons stated against are the very reason for.
Television has had many programs on the subject recognizing the need
for examination (both self and medical) and early detection. Newscasts
locally have had specials and commercials are being run prime time.
Provinces are talking about making it as easy as possible for women to
obtain examinations. Doctors offices have information available and
most have made Xrays part of their medical after 50.
But, I have seen little about prostrate cancer amoung men. No
commercials, no special programs, no newscasts etc.
To accuse men of purposely underfunding research in this area appears
to be irresponsible jounalism.
In many cases, the old saying goes for both men and women, 'you can
lead a horse to water but you can't make him drink.'
When was the last time you got your prostrate gland checked?
|
94.20 | | STARCH::WHALEN | Rich Whalen | Tue Nov 16 1993 15:24 | 10 |
| My doctor said that they don't normally do prostate exams until the patient is
somewhere in their 40s. I'm 35, so I didn't get one this time.
There is another cancer, which only men can get, that you can do self-exams for:
testicular cancer. My doctor did check for that, and also asked if I did
occaisional exams. I don't know what the frequency of it relative to prostate
cancer is though. But, you don't see much literature/tv programs encouraging
men to do regular exams of their testicles.
Rich
|
94.21 | | NOTIME::SACKS | Gerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085 | Tue Nov 16 1993 15:48 | 3 |
| When I had a complete physical at 35, I was given a prostate exam. While it's
not pleasant for the patient or the doctor, it only takes a minute. I'll ask
some doctor friends what they think.
|
94.22 | | AIMHI::RAUH | I survived the Cruel Spa | Wed Nov 17 1993 09:35 | 5 |
| When was the last time I got my prostrate gland exam? When my ex wife
asked for a divorce!:_) And the opposing camps attorney wanted to check
me out to see if this would fit proper.:)
|
94.23 | | HDLITE::ZARLENGA | Michael Zarlenga, MRO AXP BPDA | Mon Nov 22 1993 12:55 | 6 |
| I got a prostrate exam when I joined my HMO back in 1980, at the
ripe old age of 21.
At least, I think that's what it was. ;')
Fletch : "Say doc, did you ever do time?" :') :')
|
94.24 | | NOTIME::SACKS | Gerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085 | Mon Nov 22 1993 13:10 | 1 |
| Um, it's prostate, not prostrate.
|
94.25 | | CALS::DESELMS | Vincer�! | Mon Nov 22 1993 14:07 | 4 |
| Well, it COULD have been a prostrate exam if he was lying face down on the
examination table.
- Jim
|
94.26 | | HDLITE::ZARLENGA | Michael Zarlenga, MRO AXP BPDA | Tue Nov 23 1993 15:44 | 1 |
| Darn, had I meant that typo, I coulda bankrolled it into a joke.
|
94.27 | | STARCH::WHALEN | Rich Whalen | Mon Dec 06 1993 09:46 | 4 |
| It was reported in the news this morning that Frank Zappa died from prostate
cancer on Saturday.
Rich
|
94.28 | | CALDEC::RAH | supported by contributing listeners | Tue Dec 07 1993 21:09 | 3 |
|
don't anyone hold their breath for the SG or her activist minions
to express any regrets on the passing of anyone from this ailment.
|
94.29 | | DSSDEV::RUST | | Wed Dec 08 1993 12:49 | 12 |
| Re .28: Are you sure? Seems to me prostate cancer's had quite a lot of
publicity lately; Bill Bixby's death, and now Zappa's, have given it
the "celebrity involvement" that seems to be such a key element of
health campaigns, and there was a lengthy article about it in a recent
issue of one of those Sunday newspaper supplement magazines (which,
whatever else one may say about 'em, seem to be about as mainstream as
one can get...).
It may not equate to a comprehensive strategy for combatting prostate
cancer, but I'd say the word *is* getting out...
-b
|
94.30 | | HDLITE::ZARLENGA | Michael Zarlenga, MRO AXP BPDA | Thu Dec 09 1993 16:20 | 1 |
| And now, Don Ameche.
|
94.31 | | ASDG::FOSTER | Like a Phoenix Rising | Wed Jan 05 1994 11:40 | 9 |
|
Recently in either Black Enterprise or Emerge I saw a BEAUTIFUL ad
about prostate cancer. It was a picture of three generations of males
in a family, and to the side was information about the prostate and how
it changes during a male's life, what men can expect and what they need
to do. It was factual, well-presented, tasteful.
So, the campaign is starting. The question is whether people will take
notice.
|
94.32 | Prostate | SALEM::GILMAN | | Wed Jan 05 1994 13:38 | 21 |
| There is allot you can do to avoid prostate cancer and BPH, (benign
prostate enlargement). First, have those check ups and have the PSA
test done after age 50.
Next pay attention to your DIET!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Ideal:
Low fat, high in vitamins A (beta carotene), E, C, and zinc, and SAW
PALMETTO (an herb available in health food stores). Also add tofu
(yeah tofu) to your diet. Far eastern diets include allot of tofu and
studies have shown that the tofu tends to minimize the incidence of
prostate cancer.
I have somewhat reversed BPH from an abnormal urine flow rate on a
medical exam, to a normal flow rate and minimized symptoms of BPH via
the above regimen.
Take it for what its worth... but the above is working for me.
Jeff
|