T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
84.1 | | JUPITR::HILDEBRANT | I'm the NRA | Tue Aug 03 1993 09:19 | 7 |
| RE: .0
You have got to be kidding???
I did hear that your ring size is close to your shoe size, though.
Marc H.
|
84.2 | | SMURF::BINDER | Sapientia Nulla Sine Pecunia | Tue Aug 03 1993 10:46 | 2 |
| I would speculate that said English professor possesses a - thingy -
whose size would indicate high intelligence...according to the theory.
|
84.3 | | AIMHI::RAUH | I survived the Cruel Spa | Tue Aug 03 1993 10:52 | 1 |
| AAAH! That would explain of the angle of the dangle therom!!:)
|
84.4 | | WAHOO::LEVESQUE | kisses,licks,bites,thrusts&stings | Tue Aug 03 1993 11:12 | 2 |
| Don't tell me; they guy claims intelligence and organ size are inversely
proportional.
|
84.5 | | FRSBEE::SWINDELLS | | Tue Aug 03 1993 13:09 | 15 |
| What a riot!!!!!! I haven't laughed this hard in a long time!!!
Too bad I had food in my mouth at the time...choke, choke.
I have noticed a direct correlation between IQ size and "thingy" size
when some men see an attractive woman walking down the hallway. Yep,
IQ size immediately shrinks...right down to crotch level!!!
Only kidding. This is really funny though!!
Donalea
|
84.6 | old rule of sociology | CSSE::NEILSEN | Wally Neilsen-Steinhardt | Tue Aug 03 1993 13:41 | 4 |
| If you analyze enough data, anything can be correlated with anything.
Slightly more seriously, both may be related to general viability,
especially in the range of low viability.
|
84.7 | Oh pahhleeze.... | BLASTA::Pelkey | | Tue Aug 03 1993 17:00 | 10 |
| So can I hope that the smaller the size would lead to
a higher intelligence...
If so,,,
I'm a frikkin genious!
|
84.8 | | FILTON::PERKINS_S | Close but no cigar! | Wed Aug 04 1993 04:34 | 3 |
| They never asked me to "slap" it out when I did my MENSA test!
|
84.9 | | NOVA::FISHER | US Patent 5225833 | Wed Aug 04 1993 08:52 | 4 |
| of course not, they were testing your the old fashioned, socially
acceptable way, not with the modern scientific method.
ed
|
84.10 | I' still chuckling ... | GYMAC::PNEAL | Hi, I'm DECresource 111xxx | Wed Aug 04 1993 09:03 | 7 |
|
The professor was from Cambridge University - which should give
some credibility to his research. Then again he is English !! :-)
The relationship was said to be proportional but they didn't
say more than that. Of course there are exceptions to every rule..
|
84.11 | hang loose | VNABRW::KOENIG_C | | Wed Aug 04 1993 11:10 | 12 |
|
We do have a saying in Austria:
"SO WIE DIE NASE DES MANNES,
SO SEIN JOHANNES"
I'm not able to translate this, but it does mean that there
is a correlation between the size of a mans thingy and his
nose... ;-)
Christine
|
84.12 | A rough translation | GYMAC::PNEAL | Hi, I'm DECresource 111xxx | Wed Aug 04 1993 11:29 | 12 |
|
A rough translation would be something in the order of;
Like the nose of the Man
Is his Johhny
Or
A Man's thingy is like his nose
Puts and interesting perspective on things, doesn't it ?
|
84.13 | so who cares? | CVG::THOMPSON | Radical Centralist | Wed Aug 04 1993 11:48 | 12 |
| > Like the nose of the Man
> Is his Johhny
I heard once that it was foot size and - thingy - size that
corrolated.
Anyone seen the Van Damme movie "Nowhere to Run?" In it a little
girl says about Van Damme "He has a big penis." Her mother says,
"No he doesn't. It's average size." The crestfallen look on Van
Damme's face is worth the price of the rental. :-)
Alfred
|
84.14 | i agree...who cares? | VAXWRK::STHILAIRE | Food, Shelter & Diamonds | Wed Aug 04 1993 12:41 | 11 |
| re .13, I haven't seen the Van Damme movie but it reminds me of what
a guy I dated said to me several months ago. He asked me if I thought
he was bigger than average, and said that one woman he dated told him
he had the biggest one she had ever seen. I said, "Yeah? Well, maybe
she doesn't get out much." :-) :-)
He was so proud of it, I just had to knock him down a peg. (and we're
not talking a dummy here...we're talking MIT grad).
Lorna
|
84.15 | Research? | CSC32::HADDOCK | Don't Tell My Achy-Breaky Back | Wed Aug 04 1993 13:13 | 7 |
|
In my college anatomy class, the instructor was trying to explain
that most men's "thingys" were roghly the same size when "excited"
when a girl in the class piped up with the now immortal,
"Oh no they're not"!.
fred();
|
84.16 | bingo! | CAMNET::ZADROZNY | | Thu Aug 05 1993 13:05 | 11 |
|
If this theory is true, then the next time i get "excited" my
IQ will rise with the rise of size. So this is how Einstine, Galileo,
Dante, Mozart,Dostoyevsky, Van Gogh, etc. etc. stumbled upon such
great things. Hmmmm maybe next time i get excited I should try to
write a novel or maybe an opera or try my hand at oils on canvas....
just a thought..........
Paz
|
84.17 | | AIMHI::RAUH | I survived the Cruel Spa | Thu Aug 05 1993 14:04 | 4 |
| I know a sick-ie who took his penis and aplyed it first to an ink
blotter then ran around the womens dorms marking the doors, walls, and
halls with an errect one.:) The mark of the 'Phantom Penis' was his
handle.:) The lad was sh*t faced when he did it.
|
84.18 | | BLASTA::Pelkey | | Thu Aug 05 1993 15:22 | 4 |
| re:17
Hallarious!
|
84.19 | | JUPITR::HILDEBRANT | I'm the NRA | Thu Aug 05 1993 15:45 | 13 |
| RE: .14
The MIT part reminds me:
You can always tell an MIT graduate
but
You can't tell him much!
:)
:)
:)
Marc H.
|
84.20 | size 11 feet | HDLITE::ZARLENGA | Michael Zarlenga, MRO AXP BPDA | Thu Aug 05 1993 17:01 | 3 |
| re:.0
I can vouch for the veracity of the theory in .0
|
84.21 | Briefly coming out of read-only mode... | ADVLSI::ARRIGHI | Get us out of here, Sulu | Thu Aug 05 1993 17:34 | 7 |
| re .14
Very nice retort -- but the jerk apparently got further with you than
he deserved.
--Tony (product of a state university, but size 11EEE feet)
|
84.22 | | HANNAH::OSMAN | see HANNAH::IGLOO$:[OSMAN]ERIC.VT240 | Fri Aug 06 1993 10:55 | 14 |
|
>
>
> briefly coming out of read-only mode
>
>
>
Out of all the conferences or subjects you could choose to break
your silence for, I'm not sur
|
84.23 | | IAMOK::KELLY | fun with film | Fri Aug 06 1993 11:07 | 6 |
| reminds me of a discussion with the girls...
you take the standard 6 inch model and put it onn
a 4'6" man and then on a 6'6" man, who is hung best?
you dont even wanna hear the small hand theory :-)
|
84.24 | well, i never | VAXWRK::STHILAIRE | Food, Shelter & Diamonds | Fri Aug 06 1993 11:12 | 6 |
| re .22, excuse me, Eric?
Maybe he just happens to find my personal life more interesting than
you do. :-) (Whoever he is!!!)
|
84.25 | | ISLNDS::YANNEKIS | | Fri Aug 06 1993 13:26 | 18 |
|
> reminds me of a discussion with the girls...
>
> you take the standard 6 inch model and put it onn
> a 4'6" man and then on a 6'6" man, who is hung best?
>
> you dont even wanna hear the small hand theory :-)
Yes I do ...
BTW - I spent many a night in college arguing at 5'8" I had an
advantage over Kareen Abdul-Jabbar (7'4") when it came to perception
given the same equipment.
Greg ... big nose ... big feet ... OK IQ ... big ???
|
84.26 | | GRANMA::MWANNEMACHER | Neck, red as Alabama clay | Fri Aug 06 1993 14:17 | 2 |
|
C'mon Tine, lets hear it....
|
84.27 | | HDLITE::ZARLENGA | Michael Zarlenga, MRO AXP BPDA | Sun Aug 08 1993 21:24 | 3 |
| re:.23
That's the standard model?
|
84.28 | | IAMOK::KELLY | Nada ici | Mon Aug 09 1993 08:24 | 1 |
| I wuz givin' y'all the benefit of the doubt :-)
|
84.29 | just ask "willy" | OTIGER::M_TACKETT | I don't want to hear about it...anymore | Mon Aug 09 1993 12:16 | 1 |
| Well....big hands, big feet, big nose. = Small brain
|