T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
44.1 | | SCHOOL::BOBBITT | an insurmountable opportunity? | Mon Mar 29 1993 08:36 | 8 |
|
attractively fitting (thought not too tight) jeans.
button-down white shirt.
black shoes or boots.
|
44.2 | | VAXWRK::STHILAIRE | I want Spring *now*! | Mon Mar 29 1993 11:03 | 21 |
| re .1, Yeah, that sounds pretty good to me, too.
I, also, like colored button-down shirts with jeans. Shirts with
unusual patterns, like Tom Petty wears on stage. I, also, like vests.
Three rock performers that I think always dress well on stage are:
Tom Petty
Keith Richards
Bob Dylan
Bruce Springsteen, on the other hand, has always been worth a second
look while wearing jeans and a t-shirt.
Lorna
ps - I also like the leather vest with no shirt under, that Bono used
to wear. (very sexy.) :-)
Also - definitely like earrings on men, longish hair, and chains or
things around the neck with crosses or whatever on them.
|
44.3 | | AIMHI::RAUH | I survived the Cruel Spa | Mon Mar 29 1993 11:22 | 6 |
| Dillon looks like he sleeps in his cloths! Tom is cought in the 60's
and Keith.... I will keep my coments to myself.:) But thats
rock&roll!:) Perhaps we could all dress like rock stars, in those
streach tight spandex pants with tiger print or zebra print.:) Esp
with my donelopbelly. What a donelopbelly? Its when my belly done lops
over the belt.:)
|
44.4 | | VAXWRK::STHILAIRE | I want Spring *now*! | Mon Mar 29 1993 11:33 | 5 |
| re .3, well, if Tom Petty is stuck in the '60's, I certainly wouldn't
mind being stuck there with him! :-)
Lorna
|
44.5 | | CSC32::M_EVANS | hate is STILL not a family value | Mon Mar 29 1993 11:44 | 17 |
|
Your milelage may vary with what I like as I am a product of my age.
Jeans tight enough to show off a well-defined tush, but not so tight as
to point out a "dunlop" problem, and for me, anything to nothing on top.
Shoes are optional. However, a t-shirt with something patently
offensive to me on it is a definite turn-off.
Enough clean hair that I feel I can get my hands into it, minimum
collar length, but I prefer shoulder length or longer. Facial hair is
a plus, but if it isn't there then the face needs to be smooth; I don't
like bristles.
Earrings, jewelry, and tatoos are optional, and it depends on what they
are as to whether or not they are a turn-on.
Meg
|
44.6 | | DKAS::RIVERS | may this vale be my silver lining. | Mon Mar 29 1993 17:51 | 7 |
| I have yet to see a guy, any guy, look bad in a tux.
After that, it varies. On the guy, on the situation, on my mood
towards the guy, etc.
kim
|
44.7 | is this cloth? | STAR::ABBASI | i am therfore i think | Tue Mar 30 1993 03:16 | 10 |
| .6
Kim, what's a Tux?
heck, if that what it is, i'll get 10 of Tuxes as long as i know what
it is.
thanks!
\nasser
|
44.8 | | DKAS::RIVERS | may this vale be my silver lining. | Tue Mar 30 1993 10:18 | 3 |
| tux = tuxedo, /nasser. Turns men right into sex objects, it does. :)
kim
|
44.9 | | CALS::DESELMS | | Tue Mar 30 1993 10:22 | 4 |
| \nasser, wear a tux to work and I guarantee you, every woman's eyes will
be on you.
- Jim
|
44.10 | | PCCAD::RICHARDJ | Pretty Good At Barely Getting By | Tue Mar 30 1993 10:24 | 4 |
| Of course he'll think every woman wants him when he keeps hearing them
say to one another, " get him.";)
Jim
|
44.11 | just my opinion .. | POWDML::ROSADO | | Tue Mar 30 1993 16:50 | 11 |
| lets see... i guess it depends on the occasion..if its just a casual
weekend then of course cool looking jeans with a nice casual shirt or
sweatshirt looks good and good sneakers..not the Mr. Rogers kind if ya
know what i mean.
for a night-on-the-town, dancing etc..then definately slightly baggy
dress pants and obviously matching shirt with or without suspenders,
dress shoes and don't hold back on the gel (we're talking GQ here)
I find black dressy shirts kinda sexy...don't wear a lot of gold chains
though! tight jeans are out also.
|
44.12 | almost forgot.. | POWDML::ROSADO | | Tue Mar 30 1993 16:55 | 6 |
| and of course, lets not forget the other "night occasion" , which
calls for calvin klein briefs OR silk boxer shorts (women can wear
these too! ;-) so next time you're at Filenes, get TWO pairs.
the International Male magazine has lots of great stuff.
|
44.13 | looks I like | SPESHR::MAHON | | Wed Mar 31 1993 16:31 | 16 |
| Let's see...
Dress look:
A fit man in a well tailored suit. Nicely polished dress shoes.
Perfectly matching socks (not plain color, argoyle(?)). Clean
fingernails, nice hair style. Amount of hair doesn't matter as
long as it ... well I can't explain it.
Casual look:
A fit man (of course) in a nice pair of snug jeans with a crisp
white (or colored) button down shirt. I also like plain white
(colored) t-shirts. Not tight (except around the bulging arms).
|
44.14 | | SMURF::BINDER | Vox turbae uox Dei | Wed Mar 31 1993 17:23 | 7 |
| Re .13
What defines fit? Would a man who is healthy but was born with, say,
spina bifida or pectus excavatum qualify if he's clean and nicely
dressed?
-dick
|
44.15 | Who Says This Is Perfect? | MYOSPY::CLARK | | Thu Apr 01 1993 03:00 | 2 |
| Why worry? Afraid of making Mr. Blackwell's "Ten Worse Dressed"?
Seen any perfectly dressed women lately?
|
44.16 | | POWDML::ROSADO | | Fri Apr 02 1993 13:48 | 1 |
| let's hear men's views on perfectly dressed women!
|
44.17 | I'm not. No. Huh? | VICKI::PAHIGIAN | No such thing as too many cats | Fri Apr 02 1993 21:06 | 39 |
| re: .15:
> Why worry?
I'm not, really. I just care how I look. I take pride in my appearance, but
I'm never sure what subset of what's being pushed by the marketeers (L.L.Bean
to International Male and everything in between) is what women *really* like to
see on men. For example, I never knew tuxedos have a strong appeal, nor did I
know that jeans and a white shirt do.
Given the choice of wearing what *I* think looks good and wearing what *women*
have told me looks good, I'll always choose the latter. Okay, I'll admit it,
I'd rather own clothes that, on me, catch a woman's eye than those that don't.
> Afraid of making Mr. Blackwell's "Ten Worse Dressed"?
Uh... not hardly. The portion of my paycheck that finds its way to the
catalogs, the men's stores, the tailor down the street from work, etc. is not
insignificant.
> Seen any perfectly dressed women lately?
I'm not sure what the relevance of this question to the matter at hand is.
My desire to look my best is in no way linked to (or reinforced by) how
attractively-dressed I personally perceive the women around me to be. If
you're inferring that the number of well-dressed women in the immediate area
should mandate how *I* dress, well, I'm sorry, but I'm a little more
independent than that.
Apart from all the above, if you had your druthers, would you rather work
with women dressed in potato sacks or with women dressed attractively? Now
turn the tables. Would women rather work and associate with men dressed in
greasy overalls and torn T-shirts or with men dressed in what women prefer to
see them in? Jeez, if we all just made a little bit more of an effort...
re .16: How 'bout if I start a new topic? (And thanks for your replies!)
- craig
|
44.18 | | DSSDEV::RUST | | Mon Apr 05 1993 10:12 | 44 |
| I haven't replied here before because I really don't have a strong
preference for what men wear; if I find the individual interesting and
attractive, I'll generally find that I like what he's wearing. [If I
haven't yet found an individual wearing an ill-fitting and stained
polyester leisure suit attractive, well, it _might_ be coincidence...]
I seldom go "Oh, my!" solely because of a man's apparel, though I'll
admit that the guy strolling down Main St. in Nashua wearing a boa
constrictor casually draped over his shoulders did catch my eye. [I
think the guy was wearing jeans-and-t-shirt as well, but I think
anything would have been dandy when accessorized by a very large
snake.]
Re .17:
>Given the choice of wearing what *I* think looks good and wearing what *women*
>have told me looks good, I'll always choose the latter.
See, my theory about clothing is that I'd rather wear what _I_ think
looks good and hope that it attracts the attention of men who think I
look good in it - or who don't care how I look any more than I do. If I
try to dress to the standards of others, my feeling is that I'll be
less comfortable than I would be dressing to my own standards, and if I
attact anyone it's more likely to be someone who prefers those "other"
standards - and thus someone with whom I may not be able to be
"comfortable" in future. [This is my fashion algorithm; others' mileage
may vary.]
>Would women rather work and associate with men dressed in
>greasy overalls and torn T-shirts or with men dressed in what women prefer to
>see them in? Jeez, if we all just made a little bit more of an effort...
Depends what I'm doing. When I was working on the ranch, driving the
wheel-rake, I (and everyone else on the crew) wore greasy jeans (if
they didn't start out that way they got that way by the end of the day)
and shirts (which generally also ended up greasy and sometimes torn -
that hay'll get ya). And I thought we all looked really, really cool.
Admittedly, the smell of axle grease isn't my favorite perfume (but
then, I don't like perfume); as a software engineer, I wear un-torn
(usually) and un-greasy (unless I had potato chips at lunch) jeans, and
a relatively clean shirt-of-the-day, and seldom notice what my
co-workers are wearing, unless their T-shirt has a singularly
impressive quip on it...
-b
|
44.19 | | CVG::THOMPSON | Radical Centralist | Mon Apr 05 1993 10:41 | 11 |
| > See, my theory about clothing is that I'd rather wear what _I_ think
> looks good and hope that it attracts the attention of men who think I
> look good in it - or who don't care how I look any more than I do.
I'm with you 100%. Why attract someone who's interested in someone that
you are not? Now this doesn't mean I don't wear things that my wife
likes me in. I still will not wear something I don't like. But I will
tend to wear the things we both like me in more then things that just
I like me in.
Alfred
|
44.20 | | VAXWRK::STHILAIRE | you really break my heart | Mon Apr 05 1993 10:48 | 7 |
| re .19, I agree. I definitely dress to please *me* but I always
feel good when other people seem to like what I'm wearing, too, and I
feel bad if other people stare at what I'm wearing, as though I was
from another planet or something.
Lorna
|
44.21 | .16 The perfectly dressed woman...;) Cher!:) | AIMHI::RAUH | I survived the Cruel Spa | Tue Apr 06 1993 13:32 | 1 |
|
|
44.22 | I dress for comfort | SPESHR::MAHON | | Tue Apr 06 1993 13:47 | 11 |
| re .14
By "fit" I mean someone who takes care of there body exercise wise.
I go along with the last few replies. I dress to please me. I have
no one to impress except myself.
So..give me a pair of jeans, a loose shirt and some work boots and
I'm ready to start the day!
Brenda
|
44.23 | | BUSY::DKATZ | Rub-a-Dub-Dub, Thanks for the Grub... | Tue Apr 06 1993 15:05 | 6 |
| oh well...I'll bite...
the models in the Undergear and International Male catalogues look
*really* good...
Daniel
|
44.24 | | VAXWRK::STHILAIRE | my building has every convenience | Tue Apr 06 1993 15:07 | 4 |
| re .23, yeah, I know... :-)
Lorna
|
44.25 | | NITTY::DIERCKS | We will have Peace! We must!!!! | Wed Apr 07 1993 12:22 | 6 |
|
I think those models might be called "eye-candy". But, do they have
brains? (And, do I care?)
GJD
|
44.26 | | BUSY::DKATZ | Rub-a-Dub-Dub, Thanks for the Grub... | Wed Apr 07 1993 12:33 | 9 |
| in Torch SOng Trilogy
Harvey Fierstein to Matthew Broderick passed out on his couch:
If you have an IQ above 50 there is no God!
;-)
Daniel
|
44.27 | | VAXWRK::STHILAIRE | my building has every convenience | Wed Apr 07 1993 12:40 | 9 |
| re .26, that's one of my favorite lines from a movie. :-)
(Especially since I totally agree about Matthew Broderick)
Unfortunately, I've seen Matthew Broderick interviewed, and it seemed
clear to me that his IQ was above 50, so.... :-)
Lorna
|
44.28 | | NITTY::DIERCKS | We will have Peace! We must!!!! | Wed Apr 07 1993 12:46 | 5 |
|
Another M. Broderick fan!!!! Swoooooooooooooooooooooon.
GJD
|
44.29 | But he's a good actor ... | MORO::BEELER_JE | We'll always have Paris | Wed Apr 07 1993 15:14 | 17 |
| .23> the models in the Undergear and International Male catalogues look
.23> *really* good...
I'm not familiar with either of these publications but I can imagine what
you're talking about .. just remember ... I have each and every attribute
that these "models" have. Just that on me those attributes are arranged
somewhat differently. Besides .. wimmins like real men as opposed to these
"drugstore models".
.27> Unfortunately, I've seen Matthew Broderick interviewed, and it seemed
.27> clear to me that his IQ was above 50, so.... :-)
His IQ may be well above 50 but I've had the occasion to meet him in person.
He has a "personality quotient" of about -10. The most stuck-up, smug,
snot that I've ever in my life had the displeasure of meeting.
Bubba
|
44.30 | | VICKI::PAHIGIAN | No such thing as too many cats | Wed Apr 07 1993 18:50 | 27 |
| I get the I.M. catalogs, too. I'm jealous of those bodies, but let's face it,
those guys put a LOT of work into how they look. They didn't get it (and they
can't keep looking that way) for free!
Anyway, we can choose clothes that accentuate our good points. For example,
I'm slim due to a historically-high metabolism, and tall and small-boned, so I
tend towards "big" shirts, "big" sweaters, and double-breasted suits (or if
single-breasted, not cut too close). Also, I try to wear lighter colors
because they're supposed to make you look "bigger."
My Dad, on the other hand, is short and squat, so if he wears sweaters they're
usually not too bulky. His shirt collars have a narrow spread, his ties are a
little narrower than usual, and he wears mostly darker colors so as not to look
too "beefy." You get the idea...
Anyway, back to I.M.... I wish they'd offer those small non-patterned (plain-
color) silk boxers again. Several years ago they had them -- they were great
because they didn't have all this extra material that would bunch up under your
pants and make you look as if you had some kind of dermatology problem on your
buns -- they fit really close. I wish I'd bought more than just the 2 pairs
that I did at the time. I.M. still has silk boxers that look as though they
have about the same cut, *except* they've all got those leopard and zebra
patterns now. Call it being overly self-conscious, but I don't think I'd be
able to get more than one leg into those before I fell down laughing. :-)
- craig
|
44.31 | best bodies money can buy | HDLITE::ZARLENGA | Michael Zarlenga, Alpha P/PEG | Fri Apr 09 1993 13:17 | 12 |
| Ten to twenty thou for cheek and chin implants, rhinoplasty, hair
transplants and liposuction and viol� ... a model!
I watched ladies' bodybuilding last weekend on ESPN. Gee, I wonder why
the wimmin all have big breasts now ... ? 10 years ago, they were all
flat-chested (a natural occurrence when you have very little body fat).
If you watch the documentary "Pumping Iron, The Women," you'll see that
the bathing suits were all checked for padding, because that was
illegal.
Gee whiz, do ya think the honkers on those wimmin might be fake?
|
44.32 | | STAR::ABBASI | are you ready for the year 2000 ? | Fri Apr 09 1993 14:08 | 10 |
| i never found lots of muscles on women attractive any way, i like
more the Marline monro type of body and look, but again i doubt any
of these women body builders will ask me for my opinion on this,
it bet must be healthy though to be like that.
i hear muscles is good for you too.
\bye
\nasser
|
44.33 | a no win situation | VAXWRK::STHILAIRE | love is strange | Fri Apr 09 1993 14:51 | 6 |
| re 31. "honkers" tsk-tsk, such an un-PC word! I thought all that
counted was if women had honkers. Now you tell me they have to be
real?
Lorna
|
44.34 | | CALS::DESELMS | Opera r�lz | Fri Apr 09 1993 15:16 | 11 |
| RE: .-1
Do most men really think a woman's breast size is that important?
Personally, I don't give a hoot or a care how big a woman's "honkers" are.
My last girlfriend had a double-A brasize. (It was actually kind of neat
because the only times she wore a bra were when it was "expected," like
when she wore an evening gown.)
- Jim
|
44.35 | | AIMHI::RAUH | I survived the Cruel Spa | Fri Apr 09 1993 15:16 | 16 |
| NAsser,
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. Women's bodies are the works of
master artist. See Rome, see your local art gallery. To me, the turn on
is a woman with a slinky black dress, and some good upper back and a
plunging back line. :)
At one time, women who were alittle plump, cherub, were the sought
after. Another time, ones with the long shoveled hair, then curls. No
wonder they are a confusing group.:) Mens clothing and styles take
years and decades to change to a woman's with the winds or with the dawn
of a new day. I have a home gym with a couple of serious women body
builders. They are inspiring contestants for local body building shows.
|
44.36 | | GIDDAY::SETHI | Oh what a feeling ..... | Mon Dec 27 1993 22:45 | 20 |
| Hi All,
This maybe an old topic but I just thought that I would add to it. I
personally make such that I have clean hair, nails etc. and comfortable
clothing that is smart.
Linen, silk, jeans, woolen and cotton fabrics are what I like. Good
comfortable shoes both formal and informal. I personally don't really
worry too much about people say but mostly I find people show some
interest in what I wear. I spend my money wisely when I choose cloths
and I know what looks good on me most of the time.
I don't have any pick up lines if I find someone is an interesting
person I will take interest. I dislike falseness so I avoid women who
don't appeal to me no matter how attractive they are as after a time
the attractiveness becomes a trap.
I don't dress to kill but to be comfortable and please myself.
Sunil
|